FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Zion

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been the victim of a dog bite injury in Zion, securing proficient legal representation is crucial to protect your rights. Trust Carlson Bier for comprehensive legal support in this challenging time. Our experienced team specializes in dog bite incidents and has an established record of securing significant compensation for our clients. We understand Illinois law thoroughly, distinguishing us as leaders in navigating its complexities to successfully advocate for those harmed by dog bites. Utilize our adept negotiation skills mixed with unrivaled persistence to increase your chances of a favorable outcome during tough settlements battles or rigorous courtroom trials if necessary. At Carlson Bier, every case matters—the pain you’re enduring due to someone else’s negligence deserves justice and we aim to deliver just that! Choose not only proficiency but also compassion; choose Carlson Bier — because when it comes down to contesting Dog Bite Injuries cases within Zion, expertise makes all the difference!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Zion Illinois

Emphasizing communication and compassion, Carlson Bier is your trusted Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases. This page is dedicated to providing comprehensive information regarding a particular area of our expertise: Dog Bite Injuries. We believe in empowering you through education and are committed to delivering value-centered content that you can easily comprehend and utilize.

Dog bite injuries present unique legal challenges due to their intricate nature, making it important for victims to become well-versed with relevant laws governing such instances. The scope of dog bite injuries does not limit itself solely to physical harm; the mental and emotional trauma ensuing from such ordeals cannot be overlooked as they significantly contribute to the overall impact on a victim’s life.

In Illinois, owners are strictly liable for any harm caused by their dogs, regardless of whether the dog had shown prior violence tendencies. Therefore, complications arise when trying to determine negligence on part of the owner in situations where the dog was provoked or if trespassing was involved at the time of the attack.

Certain aspects require careful consideration while dealing with dog bite cases:

• Location of Incident: Was it public property or private?

• Owner’s Responsibility: Was there any negligence demonstrated?

• Provocation: Did anything provoke the animal into attacking?

• Injury Evaluation: What kind of injury did you sustain? How severe is it?

Understanding these elements and effectively applying them forms an integral part of building a compelling case that holds up against scrutiny. Hiring a seasoned attorney significantly increases your chances for successful recovery as negotiating compensation without expert assistance could potentially lead one astray due to lack of full understanding concerning claim processes or rights infringement by insurers seeking reduced payouts.

We at Carlson Bier have honed our craft through years spent passionately advocating for personal injury clients just like you — emphasizing open communication lines we strive towards ensuring every query answered and concern tackled. Our professional attorneys are versed in all key facets associated with dog bite law – equipping us with the ability to efficiently analyze your case, provide practical advice backed by concrete information and subsequently implement aggressive strategies aimed at securing fair compensation.

It is crucial to remember that time plays an essential role in these cases; delaying legal action could lead to evidence disposal or even expiration of statute limitations on claims. Therefore, if you are dealing with a dog bite injury, we strongly encourage immediate consultation with legal experts from our team to ensure accurate documentation of injuries as well as prompt medical treatment.

As daunting and overwhelming as this ordeal may feel right now, having seasoned advocates on your side can make all the difference—aiding not just recovery but also potential prevention of future similar incidents by holding negligent parties accountable. Thus reinforcing societal responsibility and contributing towards safer communities.

We believe every person has the right to seek justice for their suffering. It’s more than just getting financial help; it’s about voicing out against negligence which resulted in such distress and eradicating elements causing unwarranted harm within our society.

It’s understandable if understanding legal technicalities related to dog bite laws feels too complex without professional guidance. But bear in mind—it doesn’t have to be this way. Allow us at Carlson Bier transform those seemingly convoluted processes into tangible progress for you.

Curious about how much your case might fetch? Click the button below – let one of our practiced attorneys walk you through valuation steps reflecting current Illinois law applications and gain a clearer perspective today on just how feasible pursuing a dog bite injury claim truly can be.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Zion Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Zion

Areas of Practice in Zion

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving adept legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Fall Incidents

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Traumas

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents secure just settlement for wounds and losses.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering adept legal representation for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for damages.

Building Collisions

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to ensuring expert legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​