...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Marengo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be extremely distressing, both physically and emotionally. Seeking legal guidance in such situations is imperative and this makes Carlson Bier your most reliable choice. This proficient law group specializes specifically in Dog Bite Injuries cases, ensuring that their clients’ rights are protected and justice served swiftly. Their deep understanding of Illinois laws related to animal attacks propels them to the forefront as effective advocates you need on your side. While Marengo citizens might bear the brunt of such incidents, they can count on the dedicated team at Carlson Bier for exceptional legal representation crucial during these challenging times.

With an impressive track record spanning several years, they have consistently achieved best outcomes with their robust negotiation skills and thorough preparation strategies. Even if medical expenses seem daunting or if compensation seems unlikely – remember, with Carlson Bier by your side, empowerment isn’t far off! Trust our expertise when it comes to navigating complex waters surrounding Dog Bite Injuries Law; we put our client’s comfort first while aggressively pursuing all avenues for restitution.”

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Marengo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys is committed to advocating for the rights and best interests of those who have been injured due to a dog bite. We understand that incidents like these can lead to devastating physical injuries, psychological trauma, and debilitating financial stress.

Dog bites are more than just surface-level injuries; they can result in significant tissue damage, infection risk, emotional distress, and even disfigurement. Additionally, beyond the physical trauma and potential psychiatric consequences such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), victims may face extensive medical bills and loss of wages due to their inability to work during recovery periods which compound the overall impact of such an unfortunate incident.

Several factors influence dog bite cases in Illinois including:

• The severity of your injuries: This includes any necessary surgeries or procedures required alongside additional treatment measures.

• Past and future medical expenses: You might be entitled compensation for immediate treatments as well as care needed in the future.

• Lost income: If your injuries prevent you from working for a period of time or permanently affect your ability to earn a living, you may be compensated.

• Pain and suffering: Psychological pain or emotional distress brought about by the experience could qualify you for further compensation.

Our expansive knowledge within this realm equips us with strategies tailored specifically for handling dog bite cases responsibly while preserving dignity for all parties involved. At Carlson Bier we strive towards not only securing maximum possible compensation but also ensuring that the quality of life isn’t compromised due to complications arising from disastrous events such as dog bites.

Understanding your legal rights after surviving something so traumatic is crucial. It’s important to note that if you were bitten by a dog while lawfully on someone else’s property – whether you were invited there or performing duties allowed by Illinois law – then under the Animal Control Act, holding liable will be possible without proving negligence on part relative’s owner thereby easing out rigors otherwise faced.

Emphasizing our dedication to serve clients with comprehensive legal support, we offer a variety of free resources on dog bite law and how best to navigate post-bite complications and legal proceedings. Do also explore FAQs section for more directed queries that might give insights into any particular concerns you might have regarding personal injury laws relevant to such cases.

Having the right representation in your corner can make all the difference after an unanticipated accident occurs. Carlson Bier has extensive experience representing dog bite victims, providing reliable counsel at every step – from filing compensation claims through litigation if required. Our unfailing commitment combined with intricate knowledge of Illinois’ personal injury law provides our clients with optimum resources when they need it most.

While each case significantly varies, trust that we will tirelessly work towards securing rightful monetary compensation thereby easingseveral burdens which otherwise could falter both healing and recovery journeys due to stress-invoking elements like piling up medical bills or loss of income.

We invite you to take advantage of our interactive ‘Case Worth’ tool featured below. This comprehensive resource aids in offering insight into potential financial awards based on specific circumstances surrounding your incident without any upfront cost or obligation.

At Carlson Bier, it’s not just about litigating; it’s about understanding the individual needs while navigating complexities associated following traumatic incidents like dog bites while rendering justice by ensuring maximum possible compensational awards underlined by provisions set as per Illinois Law. Your fight is ours too – Let us be there for you through this challenging time.

Click on the button below now and discover what your case is worth today with Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marengo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Marengo

Areas of Practice in Marengo

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving skilled legal support for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering expert legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate settlement for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Extending adept legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​