...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Taylor Springs

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re faced with the significant trauma of a dog bite injury, trust Carlson Bier to handle your legal needs. With an extensive background in managing personal injury cases related to canine attacks, our team offers dedicated and meticulous service aimed at achieving the most positive outcomes for our clients. As experts within Illinois State law concerning dog bites, we understand the complex nature these cases can possess. Our seasoned attorneys work diligently to assemble a strong case on your behalf enabling victims to focus solely on their recovery. Commitment is integral in assuring victim rights are upheld and defended adequately; this is where Carlson Bier stands out as an optimal consideration for handling such sensitive affairs proficiently and professionally. Navigate your way through this turbulent period with guidance from qualified professionals who foster confidence while fiercely advocating for justice on behalf of dog bite victims—consulting services provided by Carlson Bier ensure clarity along every step of this legal journey towards resolution.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Taylor Springs Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we regularly represent victims of dog bite injuries across the state of Illinois. Being bitten by a dog can be a traumatizing event that has long-lasting physical and psychological effects. We have made it our mission to be your dedicated partner in these situations, ensuring you receive proper compensation for your ordeal.

Dog bites can cause severe injuries including puncture wounds, nerve damage, and infections such as Rabies or Tetanus. They may also result in psychological trauma like fear or post-traumatic stress disorder that interferes with daily life activities. Within Illinois’s statute involves the ‘one bite rule’, which entitles victims to seek compensations even if the dog had no prior record of aggressive behavior.

A few key facts about Illinois dog bite law include:

• Dog owners are strictly liable for any injury their pets cause.

• The victim does not need to prove negligence on behalf of the owner; only needed is proof that the injury was caused by the owner’s pet.

• Compensation can cover medical expenses, lost wages, disfigurement or disability, pain and suffering as well as PTSD therapy costs.

When dealing with a dog bite incident, there are certain critical steps we recommend:

• Seek immediate medical attention: Prioritize your health above everything else. Even minor-looking wounds could lead to significant medical issues later on.

• Document evidence: Take photos of injuries and keep track of all related expenses incurred.

• Get Contact Information: Obtain personal information from the dog’s owner along with any witnesses involved.

Our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier will provide all necessary legal representation and advice during this difficult time in your life.

One point worth mentioning is that under an important ruling by the Supreme Court of Illinois often referred to as “the policeman’s rule,” police officers cannot sue owners for dog-bite-related injuries incurred while performing their job duties; however, exceptions do exist which our team specializes in identifying and capitalizing.

While navigating the legal system can be a daunting task, remember that you don’t have to do it alone. Carlson Bier is experienced in dealing with complex cases involving dog bite injuries and we’re dedicated to obtaining the best results for our clients. We understand that each situation presents unique challenges and requires individual attention, which is why we offer free case evaluation consultations to help point your journey towards success.

recognizes that immediately following a dog-bite injury, there are many things running through your mind: medical appointments, pain management protocols, healing timescales – and amidst all this, taking on a legal battle might seem overwhelming. Our aim as trusted personal injury attorneys is to shoulder these burdens for you – allowing you time and peace of mind to recover fully.

Through our years of experience handling dog-bite claims within Illinois’ state boundaries, our firm has developed expert knowledge of associated compensation laws and regulations. We are well-equipped to advise on eligibility criteria for different forms of damages including medical expenses from surgery or rehabilitation treatments; lost income due if unable work during recovery period; emotional distress suffered after an attack among other pecuniary losses linked directly with traumatic incidents such.

We are enthusiastically committed not simply in securing maximum financial recompense for victims but also tirelessly advocating changes toward safer community environments against uncontrolled dogs roaming about harmfully thereby undercutting incidences recurrence as far practicably possible by backing relevant legislations enhancing stricter enforcement public safety statutes across jurisdictions serviced.

Injury cases vary greatly depending upon circumstances surrounding them making it sometimes challenging assessing accurate compensatory amounts deserved justly so based ours extensive background field guiding navigate process efficiently confidently while striving together fetch what rightly yours deservedly ensure made whole fullest possible extent restoring former lifestyle pre-incident condition physically emotionally financially systematically responsibly reliably transparently diligently dependably expeditiously judiciously commendably successfully meaningfully satisfyingly gratifyingly impressively holistically empathetically sympathetically compassionately consolingly reassuringly gratifyingly meritoriously profession ethics committing best practice principles focusing client needs priorities exclusively first always necessarily.

Curious to know how much your case could be worth? At Carlson Bier, we can help cut through the legalese and provide you with a clear understanding of your unique situation. Please click on the button below for a free, no-obligation case evaluation – we’re eager to assist!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Taylor Springs Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Taylor Springs

Areas of Practice in Taylor Springs

Bicycle Incidents

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering expert legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Offering expert legal support for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Fall Incidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Delivering legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Collision

Offering adept legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Incidents

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Dedicated to extending professional legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Spine Injury

Specializing in supporting clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​