...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Phoenix

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a Dog Bite Injury can result in serious physical trauma, emotional distress and financial burden. If constant confrontations with insurance companies are adding to your stress levels, turn to Carlson Bier’s expert attorneys for comprehensive legal assistance. As highly skilled lawyers specializing in the nuanced field of dog bite injury law, they have successfully represented clients across various jurisdictions. Their profound understanding of related laws and commitment to obtaining justice ensures that you receive due compensation for your ordeal.

Successful dog bite injury resolutions often require extensive knowledge on animal behavior, medical terminology associated with injuries and multilayered insurance issues; complexities Carlson Bier navigates skillfully. They work tirelessly analyzing every element involved in the attack – owner negligence, leash law observance or breed specifics- using these insights to formulate a robust argument.

If you or someone you know has fallen victim to such an unfortunate episode anywhere within Phoenix city limits (and beyond); choosing Carlson Bier as your representation would be invaluable in keeping those liable accountable while securing maximum settlement possible under applicable state laws.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Phoenix Illinois

When it comes to personal injury law, Carlson Bier maintains a strong focus on Dog Bite Injuries. As Illinois-based attorneys, our expertise is grounded in the laws of this state and the safety protocols that should be established by pet owners. We believe in representing victims of dog bites and fighting for your rights so you can receive financial compensation and peace of mind.

Dog bites can lead to serious harm – both physically and emotionally. The physical injuries can range from minor tissue damage to significant impairment, including wounds, lacerations or punctures; broken bones; infection risks and complications such as rabies or tetanus; eye injuries which could result in vision loss. Moreover, victims might also suffer psychological trauma causing fear, anxiety or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Illinois statute categorically puts the liability on dog owners if their pet attacks someone without provocation while they are acting peacefully in any location where they legally have a right to be. This means if you were bitten by a dog in Illinois, under most circumstances, you have recourse under the law because Illinois applies what’s known as “strict liability” pertaining to animal attacks.

Furthermore:

– Victims often end up with huge medical bills.

– Periods of work absence due to hospitalization can result in wage loss.

– Serious cases might demand professional counseling against emotional distress.

– Long term physical therapy may be needed for severe injuries.

It’s crucially important after sustaining an injury from a canine attack that you engage legal representation such as Carlson Bier who understand these complexities and nuances related to personal injury laws specific to dog bites.

We at Carlson Bier undertake an extensive investigation process which entails gathering evidence logically tying the incident with sustained injuries – photographs of the scene & wounds; your clothing pieces during the incident etc.; procuring information about previous aggression instances exhibited by the same pet; compiling medical records indicating bite-related treatments received thereby estimating possible future cost projections.

Moreover, we provide firm representation in negotiations with insurers who often aim for minimalistic settlement payouts. Our skillfully drawn strategy ensures optimal protection of your rights while driving a hard bargain to fetch you most appropriate monetary respite.

Steering clear of the common pitfalls marring personal injury claims tied to dog bites, our dedicated attorneys support you throughout investigating the incident; gathering evidence; determining fair compensation and filing law suits if needed besides working out settlements.

Being bitten by a vicious dog does not only lead to physical hardships but mental trauma as well. You deserve proper justice and remuneration that covers your medical expenses, wage loss during convalescence as well as emotional damages suffered. It’s time to give voice against irresponsible pet ownership fostering possibly avoidable animal attacks and initiate legal action seeking rightful recompense for what you have undergone.

The complexity surrounding personal injury cases makes it essential that victims receive guidance from seasoned lawyers like Carlson Bier who can rightfully represent their case based on facts and strategic implementation at all stages amid this legal journey.

There’s no exact formula when it comes to determining how much a Dog Bite Injury claim could be worth because an in-depth analysis of various factors goes into finalizing it – measurable such as medical bills alongside imponderable like pain, suffering & PTSD symptoms if any etc.; Yet rest assured knowing Carlson Bier will spare no effort in fight for fairness on your behalf ensuring victory tastes sweeter than just monetary gain imparting life back its lost rhythm post-dog bite ordeal.

Click below now to see how Carlson Bier can help determine what kind of compensation your case could potentially be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Phoenix Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Phoenix

Areas of Practice in Phoenix

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending skilled legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving defective products, offering skilled legal help to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Trip Incidents

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents gain just payout for damages and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Semi Collision

Delivering expert legal assistance for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Building Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Head Traumas

Committed to ensuring expert legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Specializing in defending clients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​