...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Crossville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Medical malpractice cases can be complex, often requiring intricate knowledge of both legal and medical systems. When faced with such a situation in Crossville, the undeniable choice for representation is Carlson Bier. This established law firm has earned its reputation due to successfully handling an array of personal injury claims – notably those involving medical negligence. With extensive experience in this delicate area, the expert lawyers at Carlson Bier understand that proving these cases requires thorough investigation, negotiation skills, and clinical know-how alongside legal expertise; all of which they possess in spades. The dedication displayed by our seasoned attorneys towards acquiring justice is unsurpassed ensuring that your voice will be heard loud and clear within the courtroom walls. At Carlson Bier’s heart lies an unwavering commitment to clients like you who deserve undivided attention coupled with professional guidance during times when it matters most – preserving your rights whilst striving for best possible outcome on your behalf in any Medical Malpractice incident.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Crossville Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted partners in personal injury law with our specialty being medical malpractice. Continually serving the great state of Illinois, we’re committed to seeking justice for those who have been at the receiving end of subpar or negligent care. Medical malpractice is convoluted terrain that calls for more than just legal knowledge; it also requires an understanding about both complexities and nuances unique to healthcare.

Medical malpractice arises when a doctor or any other healthcare professional veers from established standards in their field, leading to harm or injury to a patient. It can manifest across numerous scenarios such as incorrect diagnosis, errors during surgery, medication mistakes, improper treatment administration among others. The legislation surrounding medical malpractice are equally intricate but fall within three essential areas:

• • An explicit violation of standard of care: All patients have the right to expect certain defined standards be adhered by medical practitioners. Should this not prove true – when outcomes deviate from what should reasonably be expected – this could constitute a possible case.

• • An injury was caused due to negligence: To establish grounds for a claim here, you need proof it is plausible neglect by a health professional resulted in your harm.

• • The injury has led to significant damages: Only if you can demonstrate substantial suffering (e.g., disability; loss of income; enduring hardship) as consequence of an act does it warrant proceeding before court.

Navigating these elements requires exceptional expertise and resources involving assertive negotiation skills alongside thorough investigation into all aspects your case entails – something the team at Carlson Bier excels at embodying through its approach combining resilience and tenacity.

We analyze every detail underneath microscopic lens ensuring no fact ever gets obscured amidst complex terminologies involved in parsing medical journals and records or expert testimonies which pertain directly towards substantiating one’s rightful claim on account genuine hardships they’ve undergone thereby ensuring fair compensation commensurate with level pain endured whether it were mental, physical or financial.

It’s also pertinent to note each state possesses different laws related to medical malpractice claims and Illinois is no exception. Notably, the statute of limitations for filing such a claim in Illinois necessitates action be taken within two years from when harm was caused or reasonably should have been noticed, and not more than four years post the care that prompted your injury.

Moreover, we celebrate victories not merely as legal triumphs but an affirmation towards the undying spirit of our clients who stand against gross misconduct committed by institutions expected to safeguard their health and wellbeing – rather than compromise it.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly navigate this treacherous landscape on your behalf providing staunch support every step you traverse through this journey while providing assuring confidence bolstered by clarity & transparency so that understanding intricate particulars become less daunting while exploring potential outcomes becomes clear-cut.

To illustrate further how deep-seated our commitment is toward providing exemplary service, we here at Carlson Bier do not charge any fees unless we win for you. We operate on a contingency fee basis which demonstrates our unwavering belief in just recompense being awarded commensurate with client hardship – Success drives us because simply put – Justice matters!

Wrapping up now if one has ever mulled upon seeking legal recourse following unfortunate incidents wrecking havoc physically emotionally draining resources making survival seem like struggle, let Carlton Bier assist – Our expertise coupled decades experience course tireless pursuit achieving justice paves way transformative change: parting clouds despair championing hope restoring dignity lost amidst circumstantial adversity. Why wait? Determine what your case could yield via clicking on the button below and unveil the best path forward tailored specifically for you – right away!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Crossville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Crossville

Areas of Practice in Crossville

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing adept legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal services to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Accidents

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Collisions: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents secure appropriate payout for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Construction Accidents

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Committed to delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Committed to advocating for patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer