FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Franklin Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a pedestrian accident, obtaining proficient legal representation is crucial. Carlson Bier stands at the pinnacle of personal injury law firms with an unwavering dedication to their clients’ needs and rights. Our prowess in representing victims of pedestrian accidents provides us a keen understanding of Illinois regulations as they pertain to these occurrences, allowing the firm’s seasoned attorneys to help preserve and acquire due restitution for our clients’ suffering. Though we champion numerous cases statewide, let your focus gravitate towards Franklin Grove where pedestrians face considerable risks daily on its bustling streets. At Carlson Bier you aren’t just another case number – here you have top caliber advocacy that centers on tangible solutions leading to efficient results for those injured by negligent drivers or treacherous road conditions. Decades spent honing our skills and strategies create indomitable representation serving client interests best during turbulent times post-accident. When considering legal assistance following a pedestrian accident, ponder no further than Carlson Bier for unmatched expertise and commitment.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Franklin Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on providing superior legal representation for those who have been injured in pedestrian accidents across Illinois. As an accomplished personal injury law firm, our mission is to utilize our extensive knowledge and resources for the benefit of our clients.

Pedestrian accidents often lead to severe injuries or even death because pedestrians typically have no protection against motor vehicles. The emotional, physical, and financial toll can be devastating – but you don’t have to face it alone. Our team understands the complexities that arise when dealing with these issues, such as understanding liability laws and negotiating with insurance companies so that your recovery isn’t compromised by unforeseen expenses or complications.

One critical aspect of the legal process involves determining fault. Several factors contribute towards this determination:

– Negligent driving: In many cases, drivers are distracted or irresponsible leading to a lapse in attention which results in pedestrian accidents.

– Violation of traffic laws: If a driver neglects traffic signals or fails to yield at crosswalks provided they aren’t obeying existing road rules.

– Reckless conduct: Such behaviors could include speeding, drunk driving or aggressive driving which pose threats for pedestrians.

Once negligence has been established by the at-fault party (or parties), filing compensation claims may seem straightforward. However, it is essential to know what constitutes damages worthy of compensation post accident; here’s where Carlson Bier illuminates:

• Medical bills related including past and ongoing treatment

• Lost wages plus future income loss if injuries induce disability

• Pain suffering along with emotional distress evidently caused by the incident

• Wrongful Death/ Funeral costs if unfortunately applicable

Survivors deserve fair compensation for their losses from the responsible parties. Merely knowing your rights isn’t adequate; standing up for them effectively requires exceptional representation unyielding in pursuit of justice—That’s why Carlson Bier exists!

Insurance firms tend to understate victims’ sufferings, downplaying the consequences of the accident in order to limit their financial responsibilities. Our legal professionals are adept at countering these tactics and undeniably advocating for the restitution our clientele deserves.

We handle each case individually, offering personalized attention tailored according to specific circumstances combined with robust advocacy aimed at achieving the best possible outcome for you. Your focus should be on recovery after this traumatizing experience; allow us to hold those at fault accountable while easing your journey towards healing.

Choosing Carlson Bier has proven beneficial to countless Illinois residents wronged by pedestrian accidents. By continuously updating our skills and deepening our understanding of Personal Injury Law nuances, we have successfully negotiated settlements or won favorable trial verdicts, transforming lives appreciably damaged by unwarranted misfortunes.

While anticipating that terrible incidents like pedestrian accidents cease entirely would be an idyllic space – The truth remains that they persist is why it is essential individuals like you know there’s reliable support capable of steering through uncertainties that lie ahead.

On visiting our site, you can gauge how previous clients have benefited from choosing Carlson Bier as their chosen personal injury law firm – We understand what justice looks like and tirelessly strive until we accomplish it! It’s about ensuring liabilities aren’t evaded & every action causing harm is aptly penalized – An objective intrinsic since Carlson Bier’s inception!

We invite you now to take advantage of a free consultation offered via clicking on the button below which will provide clarity regarding what’s your case potentially worth. You swallow a bitter pill when injuries suffered due to someone else’s negligence burden colossal derailment to life as known – Reach out today itself! Let us battle against unjust odds so together we facilitate rightful restoration back onto path tread before unwanted disruptions manifested consequentially alterable incidents impacting pedestrians daily across Illinois at large!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Franklin Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Franklin Grove

Areas of Practice in Franklin Grove

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Burns

Supplying professional legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Providing professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending expert legal help to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents get just compensation for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring adept legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to extending professional legal representation for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​