...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Chicago Lawn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When pedestrian accidents occur in Chicago Lawn due to another party’s negligence, Carlson Bier steps forward as staunch advocates. As top-tier personal injury lawyers within Illinois, our specialization lies in efficiently handling and winning pedestrian accident cases. We ensure every client receives the utmost care and legal guidance while pursuing rightful compensation for their grief and suffering.

Being situated near busy roads or intersections multiplies the risk of unfortunate incidents faced by pedestrians daily. Understandably coping with these unforeseen circumstances can be exhausting – physically, emotionally, and financially.

The expertise at Carlson Bier makes us recognized authorities on all intricacies surrounding pedestrian law cases. Our seasoned attorneys meticulously review each case detail ensuring adequate representation aligns with your needs seamlessly.

At Carlson Bier we’re dedicated to more than just seeking justice – we go that extra mile ensuring you receive fair compensation for medical costs, loss of income or earning capacity besides pain & suffering endured.

Choosing a responsive Pedestrian Accident attorney is crucial; at Carlson Bier we pride ourselves on individual attention coupled with compassionate understanding towards every client’s ordeal.

Devoted to impeccable service standards regardless of location boundaries within Illinois assures clients peace knowing they’ve entrusted their voice into reliable hands.Significant successful outcomes consistently prove why residents prefer turning to Carlson after facing a distressing incident—all because serving justice isn’t only about law but also empathy; values embedded deep within our firm’s foundation.Carlson Bier: Your dependable shield amid Pedestrian Accidents!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Chicago Lawn Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases with a particular emphasis on pedestrian accidents. Pedestrian safety is an issue that resonates deeply throughout Illinois and forms the core of our legal practice. There’s an often-asked question: what constitutes a ‘Pedestrian Accident?’ Simply put, a pedestrian accident occurs when an individual walking or running on foot encounters harm due to a mishap involving motorized vehicles—be it cars, motorcycles, trucks or public transportation.

There are vast complexities related to pedestrian accident claims and having the right professional guidance is critical. At Carlson Bier, you get far more than just representation; you receive unrivaled expertise in navigating the legal storm that these events can provoke.

Specifics matter tremendously in such cases. For instance:

· Fault determination: This involves establishing who was responsible for the accident. In some scenarios, more than one party may bear liability.

· The scope of injuries suffered: Injuries from pedestrian accidents can range from minor cuts and bruises to detrimental ones like broken bones and brain injuries.

· Compensation claim process which includes economic losses like medical bills and income loss as well as non-economic damages like pain and suffering.

Recognizing these key elements helps us understand how to effectively strategize and position your case for success.

Now let’s delve deeper into Illinois pedestrian laws because knowing your rights hugely impacts the progression of your case:

1) Right-of-way Laws: When traffic control signals aren’t present, drivers must yield right of way to pedestrians within any marked crosswalk or unmarked crosswalk at intersections.

2) Whenever possible, pedestrians should walk on sidewalks – if none exists then they have leeway to use road shoulders facing traffic.

3) It’s illegal for drivers to overtake other vehicles stopped at crosswalks – this hides emerging pedestrians from view initiating potential risks.

Arming yourselves with information like this better prepares you for handling collisions predicaments but when an accident occurs, some immediate steps are advised:

• Ensure Safety: Your immediate safety and the safety of others involved should be your priority. If possible, move yourself out of harm’s way.

• Seek Medical Help: Regardless of the injuries’ initial appearance, seeking professional medical help is paramount—the adrenaline rush post-accident can mask injury symptoms.

• Document The Scene: Gather as much evidence from the incident scene—pictures or videos if viable. Get witness contact information whenever achievable.

• Contact Law Enforcement: Report the incident to law enforcement agencies immediately.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in equipping our clients not just with legal expertise but also useful knowledge—it’s how we differentiate ourselves.

This brief overview provides a snapshot into pedestrian laws that exist in Illinois and reminds you about crucial first steps right after an accident. Pedestrian accidents need not always redefine life paths negatively—you have rights protected by law safeguarding fair recovery prospects to compensate for any physical and emotional turmoil experienced.

Our personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier carry decades-worth rich experience within these realms—they understand intricacies, know their ways around insurance company negotiation tactics and most importantly comprehend the human aspect in all this—it’s not JUST a case number!

We’re ready to assist—and bear firm resolve in obtaining measurable results on your behalf! Illnesses won’t wait nor should justice! So why not head below now? Click on our compensation calculator button – it’s time to decipher what you’re rightfully owed following an unfortunate pedestrian mishap. As with all journeys towards rightful justice—we’re with you every step of the way. At Carlson Bier—we don’t just stand FOR you, we stand WITH you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chicago Lawn Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Chicago Lawn

Areas of Practice in Chicago Lawn

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Giving expert legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Trip Accidents

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents receive fair compensation for injuries and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing expert legal advice for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on extending specialized legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Focused on representing individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​