...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Taylor Springs

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing the aftermath of a spinal cord injury can present intricate legal challenges. To navigate these complexities, trusting an experienced law group like Carlson Bier becomes crucial. They have verstablished themselves as exceptional advocates for victims of spinal cord injuries in Illinois. Steering through multifaceted medical and insurance details demands both empathy and acumen—cornerstones of our unwavering commitment to clients’ needs at Carlson Bier. Our experts work relentlessly; understanding claims intricacies related to spinal cord damage while prioritizing your peace of mind above all else.

We realize how critical every case is—a person’s livelihood hangs on it: Yours does too! It’s this level of personal investment that defines what sets us apart from others: passion matched with proficiency.

For those grappling with such life-altering situations around Taylor Springs, choosing Carlson Bier means securing access to comprehensive legal assistance founded on knowledge, dedication, integrity – traits integral to delivering satisfactory outcomes for those contending with devastating circumstances like Spinal Cord Injuries.

Therefore choose wisely Choose –CarlsonBier!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Taylor Springs Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact spinal cord injuries can have on individuals and their families. As experts in Illinois personal injury law, we specialize in representing victims who experience such life-altering conditions. Spinal cord injuries are serious medical problems that require not just immediate medical attention but often ongoing support throughout the victim’s life. They typically result from traumatic events like motor vehicle accidents, falls, sports accidents, or acts of violence.

Spinal cord injuries essentially disrupt communication between your brain and body. This disruption can cause changes in function, sensation, and mobility below the level of injury. In some instances, individuals may lose all feeling or movement below the affected area – known as complete paralysis; while others may retain some degree of function and sensation – referred to as incomplete paralysis.

Key aspects about spinal cord injuries include:

• Types: There are two main types—complete and incomplete—as mentioned earlier.

• Severity: The severity usually correlates with the location of the injury. Higher injuries tend to produce more severe symptoms like tetraplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), whereas lower ones might lead to paraplegia (lower body paralysis).

• Symptoms: These can range from pain or numbness to loss of muscle control and even difficulty breathing depending on which nerves have been damaged.

The treatment for spinal cord injuries is multidimensional—it includes immediate emergency care followed by long-term treatments like rehabilitation therapy aimed at maximising recovery; it generally involves physiotherapy, occupational therapy and counseling among other interventions. Medical hardware such as wheelchairs or assistive devices may also be necessary for mobility enhancement.

When it comes to financial costs linked with spinal cord injury cases, these too can be substantial—the lifetime health care expenses along with lost income can run into millions. Here’s where an experienced law firm like Carlson Bier steps in—we help you navigate this overwhelming situation while fighting relentlessly for your right to compensation.

The legal process in spinal cord injury cases revolves around proving fault and establishing liability. This often entails comprehensive investigations into how it happened—be it a car accident, slip and fall, or medical malpractice among others—to accruing evidence that convincingly corroborates your claim.

Another critical aspect is to accurately quantify the damages you’ve suffered—a task that seems daunting given all the different factors at play (medical bills, loss of future earnings, pain & suffering etc.). Our skilled personal injury attorneys can help you calculate these damages ensuring nothing gets left out or underestimated.

Whether dealing with contentious insurance companies or navigating the complexities of Illinois’ personal injury law—we promise to guide you every step of the way asserting your rights while striving for maximum compensation.

Our diligence stems from our firm belief that no victim of such devastating injuries should bear additional trauma of financial burdens. That’s why we offer a ‘no win-no fee’ agreement—under this arrangement, you’ll only pay us if we are successful in obtaining compensation for you; this assures an absolute lack of risk on your part coupled with our unwavering commitment towards advocating for your justice.

Carlson Bier aims not just to be your trusted legal advisors but also compassionate confidantes during these hard times—for us its about aiding resilience through advocacy! We consider informed clients as empowered ones which is why transparency infuses our work approach allowing clear communication throughout the legal process.

Remember—whenever confronted with a spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence, don’t hesitate to seek expert legal advice.

At Carlson Bier, we believe it’s crucial to understand how much value lies in your case—it forms an indispensable step towards justice. So now that we’ve provided enlightenment about spinal cord injuries and their implications– wouldn’t you want control over what happens next? To know exactly where you stand legally? How much could potentially be awarded in settlement?

We encourage you- click on the button below. Discover more about your case’s assessment, uncover its worth; unleash its potential through legal expertise that Carlson Bier guarantees!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Taylor Springs Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Taylor Springs

Areas of Practice in Taylor Springs

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying adept legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering experienced legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal help to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Tumble Mishaps

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents obtain fair payout for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Accident

Providing professional legal representation for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Committed to supporting persons with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer