...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Addison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Addison, dog bite injuries can be traumatic and life-altering. It’s essential to have legal representation that is experienced and dedicated to fighting for your rights. Carlson Bier stands strong in such contexts, prepared to champion your case effectively with proficient handling of dog bite injuries cases. Our unwavering commitment lies in supporting our clients’ interests using strategic litigation catered specifically towards their needs. An excellent reputation precedes us due to a track record of impressive victories and maximized settlements proven through countless testimonials from satisfied clients. We leave no stone unturned while investigating the incident thoroughly including the owner’s negligence or any violation of local animal control laws, thus ensuring every possible compensation channel is explored for medical expenses, lost wages or mental anguish borne by you after a canine attack incident. Entrust your claim with Carlson Bier: we bring efficient representation home shaken by canine aggression incidents without compromising on personal dedication or accountability at Illinois state law compass.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Addison Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we hold the belief that dog owners have a responsibility to protect the public by managing their pets appropriately. Unfortunately, dog bite incidents are more common than you may think and these aggressive encounters can lead to severe injuries with far-reaching consequences. If you, or someone close to you, has been bitten by a dog in Illinois, this information will provide valuable insight because understanding your rights is paramount.

Dog bites can inflict varying degrees of damage – from superficial wounds to catastrophic injuries; therefore identifying their severity is integral. Some key aspects include:

• Superficial Wounds: These often involve minor scratches and punctures but still carry the risk of infection.

• Deep Punctures: Dog teeth can penetrate deep into tissue causing significant damage which often requires surgical intervention.

• Severe Mutilations: In extreme cases, dog bites may result in disfigurement or even loss of limb functions.

One area many people overlook after such an incident includes psychological trauma. Serious anxiety issues, including nightmares or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), might emerge due to these violent encounters with dogs.

Moreover, trying to handle legalities without knowledge or experience compounds victim’s experiences who already shoulder physical pain and emotional distress. At Carlson Bier, we believe it’s essential for victims of dog bite incidents to understand both immediate rights and long-term options available under Illinois law.

The very first thing is obtaining both prompt professional medical assistance and police reports. Even seemingly trivial injuries must be properly documented – this evidence could prove crucial later on when filing a compensation claim. Secondly, make sure that pictures are taken of all visible injuries before treatment begins given their changing nature during healing stages.

According to Illinois law liability falls squarely at the owner’s doorstep regardless if they knew about previous aggression(s) by their pet as per 510 ILCS 5/16 (Illinois Animal Control Act). Compensation that one seeks should cover costs associated with medical expenses, physical therapy and rehabilitation, loss of work income, pain and suffering or any type of psychological counseling.

Furthermore, despite common misconceptions surrounding breed classifications under Illinois law – there isn’t a ‘dangerous breed’ distinction. No dog belonging to a specific breed is inherently labeled as dangerous nor their owners exempted from legal implications following an attack under current legislation. Every victim has the right to pursue compensation no matter what type of dog the aggressor was.

At Carlson Bier we passionately represent victims injured by dogs across Illinois using our vast experience navigating intricate pathways of personal injury claims within bureaucratic systems – ensuring client’s needs are met fully during these trying times. While our primary office may not be located in Addison or nearby towns, our extensive digital presence allows us to serve clients throughout Illinois efficiently.

Remember each case presents its own unique array of complexities so choosing attorneys with specialized expertise in dealing exactly with such cases proves invaluable. Over years we’ve managed to recover millions in damages for those who have suffered via a dedicated approach that includes comprehensive case evaluations hence reducing financial burdens imposed on innocent victims due to reckless dog owners.

If you’re weary about costs associated with securing professionally acclaimed attorneys do not fret; here at Carlson Bier our fiscal policies prioritize your recovery rather than burdening you with upfront charges. We operate strictly on contingency basis which means unless successful results are attained on your behalf – you owe us nothing!

In closing remember every dog bite incident produces different effects depending upon various components including severity of injuries, involved parties and circumstances leading up towards it – thus having experienced lawyers working tirelessly by your side remains invaluable for optimal outcomes time after time! It’s essential that victims reach out promptly because statutes regarding this claim genre remain restrictive – don’t let time run out-begin today by clicking the button below for an evaluation and explore how much your case could potentially be worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Addison Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Addison

Areas of Practice in Addison

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Extending expert legal help for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Incidents

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Committed to helping patients of car accidents gain appropriate recompense for hurts and losses.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Crash

Providing professional legal services for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Expert in ensuring specialized legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on assisting clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer