FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Addison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Addison, pedestrian safety is vital and unfortunately accidents occur despite our best efforts. If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian incident, the proficient team at Carlson Bier is well-equipped to assist you. Upholding the highest standard of legal expertise, they have an impeccable track record successfully representing clients who have suffered due to such accidents in Addison.

Their attorneys are seasoned professionals who prioritize your interests above all else – establishing liability and striving for fair compensation so your only focus is on recovery and healing. They’re experienced with navigating through complex Illinois pedestrian accident laws ensuring optimal outcomes for their clients.

Carlson Bier specializes in understanding intricacies of these cases- from driver negligence to hazardous road conditions or even defective traffic control devices – they actively ensure every aspect is meticulously scrutinized under law’s stringent lens. The devoted team will thoroughly evaluate your situation developing compelling strategies designed for success offering relentless advocacy until justice has been duly served.

If you’re seeking unrivalled knowledge coupled with compassionate care during difficult times following a pedestrian incident – think Carlson Bier; championing rights one step at a time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Addison Illinois

Recognized as a premier personal injury law firm, Carlson Bier delivers exceptional legal services to those impacted by pedestrian accidents across Illinois. Being a victim of such unforeseen mishaps can leave one with daunting physical injuries, emotional trauma and escalating medical bills – we understand the magnitude of your ordeal and strive to alleviate it.

Pedestrian accidents are instances where an individual is struck by a motor vehicle while on foot. Given the asymmetry in size and weight between humans and vehicles, these incidents often result in serious bodily harm or fatalities. Victims may incur broken bones, damages to internal organs, traumatic brain injuries or spinal cord damage which could potentially disrupt their normal life course for weeks, months or even permanently.

Our knowledgeable attorneys guide you meticulously through the complexities of liability and negligence fundamental to these incidents. Notably:

• The driver’s duty of care: Every driver holds a responsibility not only towards others on the road but also pedestrians.

• Breach of duty: If this responsibility is compromised due to distraction, intoxication or reckless driving – it forms a breach.

• The concept of causation: Aligning the breach with the incident where it substantiates how violating the ‘duty’ caused harm to you as a pedestrian.

• Degree of damage: Finally outlining proof showcasing the depth of damage suffered physically and financially.

With Carlson Bier’s wealth of experience coupled with unwavering commitment toward our clients have enabled us in crafting winning arguments covering each facet justifiably. We ensure securing maximum compensation that covers loss wages if you’re away from work during recovery, cost related to current and future medical treatment including therapies or surgeries if required owing your injuries & psychological counselling; maintaining an utmost transparency throughout our proceedings.

It’s essential to note that examining all aspects concerning accident reconstruction plays crucial role pertaining case strength – location details , vehicle speed factors , drivers’ sobriety level at collision time etc., every nuance aids in compiling solid evidence. However, the timeliness in reaching out for legal assistance is highly significant as Illinois law indicates a two-year statute of limitation post-accident to file a lawsuit.

With our superlative advocacy skills honed over years dealing with varied cases around pedestrian accidents and personal injury, Carlson Bier ensures your claims are handled in most competent manner aimed towards most feasible resolution outcome. Our ‘no recovery – no fees’ policy emphasizes we don’t charge a penny till your claim wins; reinstating our relentless pursuit for justice echoing faith and trust that our clients place on us.

Pedestrian safety remains paramount. Though government bodies implement various measures for enhanced protection, unfortunate instances still occur – where vehicles fail stopping at crosswalks or encore rash speeding near schools zones neglecting pedestrian right-of-way rules among other violations resulting accidents with pedestrians majorly bearing brunt of injuries – one needs dependable legal backup ready from the get-go to navigate this strenuous journey capably.

Taking on insurance agencies can feel overwhelming especially when you’re convalescing after such an upsetting incident but fret not with Carlson Bier, we command negotiations seeking rightful compensation that complies all damages incurred bypassing any attempts of lowball settlements disabling further financial strain while you focus solely toward healing and restoration.

Transcending boundaries through superior representation, make your way to seek consultation and leverage our immense knowledge base educating yourself about complexities surrounding pedestrian accidents? Click the button below which would help us evaluate worthiness in terms of monetary value associated with your case meanwhile familiarizing you steps involved during these proceedings ensuring an empowered decision-making for prospective legal journey ahead. Experience unwavering dedication that uniquely sets us apart encapsulating values like integrity,respect,and perseverance advocating staunchly amidst challenging circumstances facilitating path toward justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Addison Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Addison

Areas of Practice in Addison

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing adept legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring specialist legal representation for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying skilled legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Tumble Injuries

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal support for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping individuals of car accidents secure fair recompense for injuries and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Mishap

Extending experienced legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to representing persons with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​