FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Alorton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to seeking justice for spinal cord injuries in Alorton, you want the best representation possible; that’s where Carlson Bier stands out. Our law firm has a distinguished track record of securing significant compensation for these devastating cases. With our unmatched resources and robust expertise, we are fully equipped to handle complex processes involved in arguing your case effectively before the court. Not only do we deal with insurers diligently on your behalf but also strive vigorously for maximum settlement or ver due trial outcome meticulously drawn by our personal injury lawyers who are well-versed with Illinois laws surrounding spinal cord injuries. At Carlson Bier, compassion is at the core of our approach – we understand what you’re going through and will tirelessly advocate on your behalf guiding you throughout each stage until a resolution is reached. Trust us; when it boils down to choosing an attorney group equipped to handle intricate matters related to Spinal Cord Injuries manifested elsewhere – there’s no better choice than Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Alorton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law and recognize how life-altering spinal cord injuries can be. Based in Illinois, our team of seasoned attorneys aims to provide valuable insights regarding such severe injuries to help you make informed legal decisions. Spinal Cord Injuries generally occur due to abrupt blows that fracture or dislocate the vertebrae resulting in potentially permanent damage.

The primary factors that contribute significantly to these injuries include vehicular accidents, slips, falls, sports-related incidents, violent assaults and diseases such as polio or spina bifida. Our goal is to offer you an understanding of the different types of spinal cord injuries for further clarity and demystification:

• Complete Spinal Cord Injury: This typically results in a total lack of sensory and motor function below the level of the injury.

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: It refers to partial loss of function where there’s still some movement or sensation below the affected area.

Spinal Cord Injuries can present various symptoms depending on severity and location; however, some common indications are extreme pain or pressure in the neck/head/back region, loss of bladder/bowel control, impaired breathing post-injury and altered sensations including numbness or tingling. Immediate emergency medical attention coupled with surgical intervention becomes imperative under such circumstances for damage-control.

Moreover, it’s crucial to understand your rights concerning subsequent legal recourse given the significant physical impact along with mounting medical bills ensuing from spinal cord injuries. According to Illinois laws protecting accident victims’ interests’, one can pursue compensation for multiple losses encompassing economic damages like past/future medical expenses and non-economic damages incorporating pain & suffering.

Our reputable lawyers at Carlson Bier will assist you tirelessly throughout this journey towards justice embracing strategic approaches aligned with your specific case requirements while operating firmly within ethical boundaries defined by Illinois law practices! We shall extend crucial services ranging from establishing fault via solid evidence compilation up until negotiating settlements thereby resolving your claim in a manner that justly correlates with incurred damages.

So, whether your spinal cord injury resulted from an unfortunate car accident or a slip and fall incident, exacerbated due to negligence of others – we have got you covered! You needn’t bear the brunt of it unsupported; instead, reach out to us at Carlson Bier for expert legal advice and quality representation that acknowledges your predicament’s gravity while offering supportive solutions.

Keep in mind; each personal injury case is unique. Hence, determining its worth necessitates thorough examination judging by extent/severity of injuries, estimated future medical costs & loss recovery besides weighing potential impacts on life quality & earning capacity – all factors held prime during negotiation proceedings targeted towards optimal compensation attainment.

We welcome you to allow our adept attorneys at Carlson Bier leverage their years’ long experience and expertise towards securing the rightful compensation you deserve – aptly reflective of your suffering endured due to unforeseen spinal-cord injuries ensuing from another’s fault. Contact us today by clicking on the button below; discover how much your case is potentially worth along with exploring initiated steps necessary for justice pursuit while embracing seamless navigation through complex legal labyrinthine phenomenal to personal-injury cases like yours.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Alorton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Alorton

Areas of Practice in Alorton

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering specialist legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents receive fair settlement for wounds and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Crash

Offering adept legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Focused on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in offering expert legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Undeserved Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and experienced legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Committed to defending individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​