FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Altamont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one becomes victim to an unfortunate dog bite incident in Altamont, Carlson Bier is the solution to your legal uncertainties. Our firm specializes in Dog Bite Injuries; we are committed to upholding our clients’ rights and securing maximum compensation for physical and emotional trauma. We understand how overwhelming situations like these can be – medical bills, stress, and potential loss of income need prompt action. The lawyers at Carlson Bier offer impeccable expertise combined with compassionate care so that victims don’t feel alone during their battle for justice. We ensure strict adherence to every pertinent law specific to Illinois while concentrating on timely response which has been appreciated by numerous satisfied clients over the years – setting us apart in this industry. Let’s fight this together—rest assured that choosing Carlson Bier as your representation will put you a step closer towards comprehensive relief from this distressing experience.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Altamont Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that dog bite injuries can result in significant pain, suffering and anxiety. As seasoned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our paramount concern is ensuring victims of such injuries receive the justice they deserve. Every year, numerous people succumb to these unanticipated incidents causing not only physical harm but also emotional distress. It has been estimated that medical expenses for treating bite-related wounds can be substantial and leave individuals burdened by unplanned healthcare costs.

Dog owners in Illinois are held strictly liable for any harm their pets may inflict on another person. This means if you are bitten or injured by a dog, you have rights under law to pursue recompense wherein the pet owner is legally obligated to pay for any damages including but not limited to loss of income due to inability to work post-incident and long-term rehabilitation needs.

• Strict liability holds the owner accountable regardless whether the animal had previously shown aggressive behavior or not.

• Owners cannot evade responsibility stating ignorance about the dog’s aggressiveness.

• Even if a person was lawfully at the location (like delivery personnel), they have every right to file a claim should they endure an attack.

Negligence plays an instrumental role in personal injury claims as well; reckless handling or inadequate maintenance creating harmful environments can lead owners into legal proceedings initiated by injured parties. Holding negligent pet owners liable serves two primary purposes – offering compensation for victims and preventing similar incidents down the line.

Understanding your rights post-dog-bite-injury is crucial hence our team of qualified lawyers are inherently dedicated towards precisely explaining relevant legal avenues and advising on best courses of action considering your unique circumstances.We hold a comprehensive understanding on Illinios statutes pertinent specifically to dog-bite-lawsuits covering:

1) Proof of Injury – Documented evidence involving hospital reports, photographs etc

2) Location – The incident must’ve occurred either public place or while lawfully present private property

3) Establishing Ownership – Verifying ownership of the attacking animal

4) Non-provocation – Showing victim didn’t provoke the dog.

Our team at Carlson Bier takes pride in our client-centered approach, always ensuring that we work diligently and quickly to assist you through this process. We understand that after a traumatic event like a dog attack, your main focus should be on recovery; let us tackle the legal landscape for you. With extensive collective experience in personal injury law, the professional acumen we bring will aid immensely in requisitioning well deserved compensation helping offset some of liabilities due to these distressful occurrences.

At Carlson Bier, we believe everyone deserves access to legal representation and advice irrespective of their financial capabilities which is why our payment structure is contingent-based i.e., you pay nothing unless we win your case. Rest assured, once onboard with our dedicated team, we are committed towards delivering justice rightfully owed to every client who has endured such harrowing injuries.

Life can be unpredictable but with Carlson Bier on your side, navigating turbulent times following a dog bite incident becomes significantly less daunting. If you or someone you know has been unfortunately subjected such an eventuality it is vital to consider taking advantage of legal support available because no one should have suffer physically financially as direct consequence pet owner’s irresponsibility. Click on button below find out how much might be worth in this struggle obtaining accountability from parties involved protecting future victims alike. We look forward assuring peace mind perusing rightful recompense those negatively impacted by negligent handling animals So don’t wait-enact claim today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Altamont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Altamont

Areas of Practice in Altamont

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing specialist legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Misconduct

Offering specialist legal representation for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to guiding individuals of car accidents receive just payout for harms and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Mishap

Extending specialist legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Committed to ensuring professional legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​