...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Arthur

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to handling cases relating to Dog Bite Injuries, Carlson Bier holds an unparalleled record. Our seasoned attorneys deeply understand the nuances of Illinois law in respect to dog bite incidents and aggressively champion for victim’s rights. Leveraging years of experience catering specifically for Arthur City residents, we have transformed lives by helping claim rightful compensations accorded by law. Afflicted with physical pain and emotional trauma following a canine attack? Rest assured that by reaching out to Carlson Bier, you are engaging credible professionals who never shirk from achieving the desired outcome under circumstances besieged with complexities. We pledge diligent representation as your steadfast advocates, treating each case individually while deploying targeted strategies perfected within our extensive legal practice history. The scar left behind may be lasting but so should be the reprieve – financial or otherwise – you secure through meticulous legal procedures adeptly managed on your behalf exclusively at Carlson Bier – councillors dedicated unreservedly towards restoring normality after a distressing incident like a devasting dog bite injury.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Arthur Illinois

As an esteemed personal injury law firm, Carlson Bier is well-positioned to assist with cases involving Dog Bite Injuries. Your quest for expert legal assistance in Illinois can find respite in our exemplary record of securing fair and full compensation for clients who have been victims of dog bites. It’s not just about the legal side of things; we understand how traumatic such an event can be emotionally.

Dog bite injuries could lead to severe medical complications that need prompt attention. Unfortunately, these medical concerns often come with hefty bills piling up relentlessly – adding financial strain to your emotional agony. With more than 4.7 million dog bite incidents occurring each year nationwide, this issue constitutes a significant part of personal injury claims.

Your rightful claim as a dog bite victim may include compensation for damages like:

• Medical Expenses: Immediate emergency care cost, follow-up treatments, reconstructive surgeries if needed.

• Pain and Suffering: Compensation for going through pain and trauma due to the incident.

• Lost Wages: Income you’ve lost during your recovery period.

• Property Damage: Reimbursement for items damaged during the incident.

The Illinois Animal Control Act holds dog owners responsible if their pet injures someone unprovoked. The legal avenue promises justice provided one navigates it properly. For doing so successfully, let us explain a few core principles around dog bite legalities in Illinois:

1. Strict Liability Law applies which means that it is unnecessary to prove negligence or fault on the ownership’s part unless there are possible grounds for defense like trespassing or provocation by the victim themselves.

2. Illinois has a ‘One-Bite’ rule where proof isn’t necessary about whether the owner knew about their dog’s aggressive tendencies prior to biting someone.

3. Filing a lawsuit within two years from when you sustained your injury is crucial- also known as Statute Of Limitations deadline.

While these laws provide potential avenues for claiming rightful compensation, it is not always easy to walk the path alone. Professional legal advice can help you build a strong argument, ensuring those responsible are held accountable and that you receive due benefits you’re entitled to.

No doubt, each case brings unique circumstances and nuances with it. Carlson Bier, as your trusted personal injury attorney group understands this implicitly. We possess extensive experience in dog bite claims – having dealt with diverse cases ranging from minor injuries to more serious incidents involving lasting trauma or substantial medical costs.

We diligently sift through every piece of evidence- medical records, eyewitness statements, official animal control reports etc., prepare for possible defenses raised by opposing parties before stepping foot in the courtroom or negotiating settlement plans on table.

Remember! Attaining justice needs victim assistance too. Here’s what we suggest:

• Seek immediate medical attention regardless of how minor wound seems.

• Report the incident to local health department or animal control authority.

• Document everything about incident including pictures of your wounds if possible; note down details like time and location of attack along with owner’s contact information.

• Never agree upon a settlement without consulting an experienced lawyer first; wanting quick closure could lead one into accepting less than deserving compensation.

Your journey towards reparation begins here and now! Click on the button below to determine how much your case may be worth. At Carlson Bier, our mission balances robust legal supremacy with empathetic human connections while addressing your personal injury claims like Dog Bite Injuries across Illinois…Rest assured knowing we’ll leave no stone unturned for securing deserved justice on behalf of you – our valued client!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Arthur Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Arthur

Areas of Practice in Arthur

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying adept legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for wounds and losses.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Accident

Ensuring adept legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to offering dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Expert in defending victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​