Medical Malpractice Attorney in Arthur

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with medical malpractice cases, it is important to choose a law firm that has the knowledge and skill set necessary to navigate its complexities. The Carlson Bier Law Firm provides outstanding legal services specifically tailored for such predicaments. Known for their client-focused approach and winning lawsuits in Illinois, they strive relentlessly to ensure you receive desired results from your malpractice case regardless of its scale or complexity. Leveraging years of experience in representing victims of medical negligence, Carlson Bier’s meticulous attention to detail sets them apart from others. This leads not only towards consistently sound judgments, but also significantly improves settlement negotiations on your behalf–helping secure maximum compensation for hardship endured due to such unfortunate incidents. Trust none other than the professionals at Carlson Bier; they are equipped with tools essential for building robust strategies concentrated towards an optimal resolution of your medical malpractice dispute while upholding utmost respect and sensitivity toward each client’s situation.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Arthur Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your reliable advocate in Illinois for medical malpractice matters. As a leading personal injury law firm, we specialize in thoroughly handling complex cases and ensuring victims receive the compensation due to them as per the Illinois law.

At Carlson Bier, our primary aim is educating clients about Medical Malpractice. This term refers to any situation when a health professional deviates from standards in their profession, causing injury or death to the patient. These scenarios can arise in various aspects including but not limitedto:

• Misdiagnosis

• Delayed Diagnosis

• Medication Errors

• Surgical Errors

• Wrongful Death

We understand that securing justice involves more than just understanding laws – it necessitates having a deep comprehension of the medical processes and healthcare practices. We strive relentlessly to offer our clients exceptional guidance and legal representation throughout their case – multidisciplinary approach combining both our legal expertise with an acute understanding of medical information.

Apart from providing top-tier representation at court proceedings, we also endeavor to bring you essential resources and educational materials allowing you, the client, to feel empowered during your suit process: knowledgeable enough to make informed decisions about your case strategy- like preparing you comprehensively by explaining what expert testimonies are needed depending on claims asserted etc., while simultaneously reassuring you about unfamiliar terminology or procedures which may intimidate some individuals who are new victims of alleged clinical negligence situations.

Medical Malpractice statutes also vary immensely between different jurisdictions-even within Illinois itself! Hence; knowing one’s standing regarding these complexities is where proper guidance makes all difference concerning getting rightful remuneration due serious harm suffered because negligent practitioners brought undue suffering upon unsuspecting patients trying run usual errands going normal clinics way anyone would expect!

Our attorneys work tirelessly towards simplifying this often-confusing labyrinth of rules without compromising full cash awards eligible victims. They stay constantly updated most current notions surrounding multi-faceted lawsuits thus offering every advantage fighting successfully against heavy losses endured unnecessarily. Our teams’ relentless pursuit towards client satisfaction clearly showcases their defined approach.

At the end, it all comes down to one significant question: What is your case worth? Time and again our expertly skilled team of attorneys at Carlson Bier have fetched impressive settlements for victims of medical malpractice in Illinois – standing testament to the immense wealth of experience we bring to any litigation table. A comprehensive assessment takes into account several factors such as but not limited to, pain and suffering endured, present and future medical expenses incurred as a result of this negligence.

Everyone deserves justice. Every injury matters. Deciding whether or not you have been a victim of medical malpractice can be an overwhelming process without expert guidance from seasoned law practitioners like us at Carlson Bier who genuinely care about lending you practical assistance during cataclysmic periods – by skillful court arguments helping reclaim significant compensatory aid pertaining various components for e.g., torehabilitation-related cost burdens; vocational therapies following livelihood disruptions etc.

To provide the most accurate evaluation possible, we encourage you to click on the button below that translates into shifting some partof your colossal burden onto responsible shoulders which proactively advocate for fair restitution pulling-out-all-stops if necessary! Find out now how much more your unique case may actually potentially warrant when comprehensively argued by conscientious professionals like us where every detail counts towards final vision critical success in mindfinelyfocusing upon building resilient cases aiming substantial accident injury settlement payouts via accountable health service providers who were stewards in relationships bound by trust inevitably betraying common expectations endangeringuncalled physical harm instead because dedicated assurances demanded standard ethical conduct sadly went unheeded dangerous consequences ensued thereon thus needing supreme vigilance necessitating public good’s greater cause.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Arthur Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Arthur

Areas of Practice in Arthur

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending professional legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Offering specialist legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering adept legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents receive fair compensation for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in extending professional legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Focused on representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer