FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Aurora

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from a dog bite injury in Aurora, Illinois, you need excellent legal representation. The personal injury law firm of Carlson Bier is the ideal choice for victims seeking justice and compensation following such incidents. With extensive knowledge about dog bite cases leveraged to vindicate your rights and robust experience battling insurance companies, choosing us means putting your best foot forward after traumatic encounters with aggressive hounds. Our commitment to clients is unrivaled; we assess each case professionally and apply our specialty skills uniquely purposed towards securing maximum settlements or jury verdicts for injuries suffered due to negligent pet owners. Launching a lawsuit can be complex; however, with Carlton Bier on your side, we make the challenging journey smoother by managing all aspects diligently until promising ramifications ensue – every victim deserves their day in court! For unmatched expertise around Dog Bite Injuries law within Illinois jurisdiction that guarantees focused personalized attention to your plight- trust only in Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Aurora Illinois

Here at Carlson Bier, we understand that legal proceedings in personal injury patterns are both intricately complex and highly sensitive. Our expertise as a dedicated team of personal injury attorneys is specifically strengthened towards handling cases arising from Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bites can be traumatizing experiences resulting in grave physical injuries and deep-rooted psychological scars. The state of Illinois considers dog owners strictly liable for damages caused by their pets under certain circumstances as per the Animal Control Act. Though there are minor exceptions, it tends to side with victims who have been bitten, attacked, or injured by dogs without provocation or while lawfully present on the premises where the bite occurred.

To recover your rightful compensation following a dog bite incident requires thorough understanding and leveraging of various elements:

• Understanding of Relevant Law: As already mentioned, Illinois operates under strict liability rules for such incidents.

• Proof Collection: Securing evidence crucial to substantiate your claim might involve procuring medical bills, photographs of injuries, witness testimonies etc.

• Quantifying Pain & Suffering: Putting a dollar value on pain and suffering endured by victims could seem subjective but is achievable using specific methodologies.

• Negotiation Skills: Insurance companies often prove challenging adversaries trying to pay out minimum amounts possible.

Navigating this hazardous terrain becomes easier when you enlist the assistance of professionals like us at Carlson Bier blessed with extensive personal injury experience accumulated over years. We actively strive to minimize stress levels enveloping our clients by diligently managing all aspects associated with their claims- from initial consultation to final settlement.

Even though we estimate each case’s potential value based on its unique facets (like severity of injuries or extent of monetary losses), we consistently aim for maximum compensation entitled legally via negotiation skillfully conducted or trial aggressively pursued if required so. For further assurance regarding our abilities, please go through testimonials left behind generously by satisfied past clients on our webpage whose lives were positively impacted after partnering with us in tough times.

Why suffer silently when the law is essentially on your side? Remember, it’s not just about compensation but also enforcing accountability on the part of dog owners for irresponsible management causing such incidents. At Carlson Bier, we endeavor to send out a clear message that negligence leading up heart-wrenching tales of human suffering will not be tolerated in our society.

Before engaging with an insurance company dealing with dog bites claims, remember they employ professional adjusters or attorneys who have mastered claiming reduction strategies. Without robust legal representation like us at your disposal, you could inadvertently compromise your potential recovery under pressure from such trained negotiators.

While seeking our help ensures lawful entitlement realization without sacrificing any claim elements unjustly, we believe everyone deserves access to basic laws governing Dog Bite Injuries and arm themselves securely against future uncertainties.

Conscious of terrible discomfort gripping victims following a horrific incident like this one coupled with lack of easy-to-understand information regarding their legal rights online motivated us into action. So now we offer all interested readers informative guides explaining these nuances in simple language downloadable free from our website striving to educate ahead of strict marketing goals conventionally prioritized by firms elsewhere.

As you approach the end of this page, think why you shouldn’t leave computation of your claim’s worth to chance or unreliable estimators bombarding internet users currently. Click on the button below instead allowing members from our dedicated team at Carlson Bier to assess case merit responsibly based on real-time data accumulated from similar successfully processed claims before settling down for what may look enticing initially but fails delivering true justice eventually. Act now- invite peace after turbulence!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Aurora Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Aurora

Areas of Practice in Aurora

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying professional legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Offering dedicated legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing professional legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents obtain equitable payout for hurts and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Accident

Offering expert legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Specializing in providing professional legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in defending patients with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440