...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Avondale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience the significant peace of mind that comes from working with Carlson Bier, Illinois’ top law firm specializing in dog bite injuries. When you’ve been involved in a situation as traumatic and potentially complicated as a canine attack, there’s no substitution for knowledgeable and committed legal representation. At Carlson Bier, we dedicate our expertise to ensure your case is handled vigorously while addressing all aspects including liability investigation, assessment of damages, aggressive negotiation or litigation if required. We are passionate about championing the rights of dog bite victims ensuring they get proper compensation for their physical injuries and emotional distress caused by such harrowing incidents. Our reputation precedes us because we prioritize actions directed toward client satisfaction through diligent service delivery regardless where you reside across Illinois. Selecting an attorney group like Carlson Bier guarantees not just relentless dedication but also profound experience drawn from serving numerous clients over years-an unquestionable assurance towards successful legal assistance defining your path to recovery.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Avondale Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and complexities that result from encountering unfortunate incidents such as dog bite injuries. As a prominent personal injury law firm in Illinois, our primary concern is navigating these legal repercussions on your behalf to secure your deserved compensation.

A dog bite can lead to serious physical harm and long-term psychological distress. Although most dogs are typically friendly companions, certain factors might trigger an aggressive response resulting in a biting incident. Our skilled team at Carlson Bier has accumulated vast experience dealing with various personal injury cases which include dog bite injuries.

Evaluating the severity of the dog bite determines whether it falls under a major or minor case category. Major cases entail severe lacerations, nerve damage, broken bones or infections such as Rabies or Tetanus. Meanwhile, minor cases involve superficial wounds or bruises which require less intensive medical intervention but may still cause considerable emotional distress.

It’s critical to note key steps following a dog bite:

• Immediately seek professional medical help.

• Document evidences like photos of injuries and location.

• Collect contact information of the animal’s owner.

• Report incident to local authority for record purposes.

Remembering to follow these guidelines increases claim legitimacy during litigation process in court.

In understanding Illinois Dog Bite Law pursuant to 510 ILCS 5/16 (Illinois Animal Control Act), liability claims do not depend on whether the pet has shown previous aggressive tendencies. Rather, it focuses more on “strict liability” stating that owners will be liable upon proof of two facts; their ownership of the animal causing injury and victim being an innocent party without provocation towards aforementioned injury.

Nevertheless, establishing evidence while recovering from an unpleasant encounter can be overwhelming for victims who are unacquainted with intricate legalese applied in pursuing personal injury lawsuits. Henceforth at Carlson Bier Associates we take pride in offering comprehensive counseling through your journey towards rightful compensation relieving you off this arduous task.

The nuances of legal compensation for a dog bite injury can extend beyond covering medical expenses inclusive but not limited to: pain and suffering, disfigurement, loss income during recovery period and future loss earning if the injuries compel job change. Reimbursement claims could also encompass emotional distress as well as psychological therapy costs depending on varying Illinois Statute of Limitations associated with each individual case.

Nonetheless, understanding these intricate details about your potential claim is no small feat. That’s why Carlson Bier offers a distinct advantage in this legal process by offering clear expert guidance tailored towards your unique situation invoking ease into comprehending complex legal jargon.

Our primary goal at Carlson Bier associates is safeguarding your best interests by advocating for rightful compensation in face of this unfortunate occurrence. We offer impressive experienced counsel conducting meticulous investigations establishing fact-based evidence supporting clients’ claims; thus warranting extensive familiarity relating to dog bite personal injury law cases in Illinois enabling us excel successfully against defence lawyers or insurance firms who attempt victimising injured parties yet again.

Upon entrusting us with your claim, you’re guaranteed expert representation under contingent basis implying payment upon successful verdicts or settlements achieved rather than upfront charges therefore allowing financial ease within stressful times that follow such incidents.

Now imagine possessing power of professional advice from skilled negotiators keen on securing favorable outcomes attuned precisely towards uncomplicated client recoveries whilst prioritizing full justice implementation against guilty parties! Simply click the button below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth with our invaluable assistance vowing ceaseless commitment towards protecting victims embroiled within unfortunate circumstances that entail dog bite injuries.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Avondale Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Avondale

Areas of Practice in Avondale

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Burns

Providing specialist legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving defective products, offering expert legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents obtain fair compensation for damages and losses.

Motorbike Accidents

Focused on providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing adept legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Head Damages

Committed to providing specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in advocating for patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​