FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Belmont Cragin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Belmont Cragin, dog bite injuries can be life-altering events necessitating experienced legal representation. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize your rights and recognize the adverse consequences of such incidents on your health and livelihood. Our team of seasoned attorneys specializes in personal injury cases with an emphasis on dog bites litigation. With a strong understanding of Illinois laws regarding animal attacks, our counsel provides thorough investigation, aggressive negotiation, and unyielding advocacy for each client’s unique circumstance.

Given the complexity inherent in these matters – from deciphering liability to quantifying damages accurately- it becomes essential to partner with a law firm that combines experience with commitment effectively.

Choose Carlson Bier as your trusted ally given our reputable track record of successfully representing victims bitten by dogs across Illinois for years now.

We strive towards ensuring you gain fair compensation reflecting not just medical costs but also the emotional turmoil encountered post-incident; thereby maximizing potential recovery while minimizing stress around legal proceedings. Trust us at Carlson Bier to fight tirelessly for justice in unwavering pursuit of retribution tailored specifically for you.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Belmont Cragin Illinois

As one prides itself on being a trusted source for legal support in Illinois, Carlson Bier understands the trauma experienced by individuals who have been the unfortunate victims of dog bite injuries. We provide unrivaled expertise and compassionate representation to our clients, focusing not only on obtaining the compensation you deserve but also helping you navigate the often complex field that is personal injury law.

Dog bites can be incredibly distressing events, leading to physical injuries and emotional turmoil. It’s crucial to understand that dog owners are generally held liable when their dogs inflict harm onto others. In such cases, the victim of a dog bite injury has indisputable rights under Illinois law to pursue compensation for whichever damages they may have sustained—such as medical bills, lost wages or income, pain and suffering—as long as it was unprovoked.

In defining what encompasses an unprovoked attack, it is essential to note that:

– A provoked attack refers to instances where the victim was knowingly trespassing or attempting harm either onto the premises or towards the pet.

– Unprovoked attacks refer simply when a person legally present at any location is bitten without aggressive action from them caused against the animal first.

It’s imperative that one seeks immediate medical attention after experiencing a dog bite—no matter how minor it may seem initially. Postponing care can lead to dire health consequences down the line such as infections or worse so make this your top priority before moving forward with anything else.

A thorough knowledge of local leash laws and statutes relating to areas including “dangerous” animals could provide further assistance in building your case (for instance if those were violated during your incident). Your familiarity with these laws will help you demonstrate owner negligence effectively which strengthens your claim considerably.

At Carlson Bier we advocate for diligent record keeping after accidents like these—you should document every detail about how/when/where happened no matter small significance appears at time; include photographs injuries treatment procedures etc this way have tangible evidence when needed.

Remember, time is of the essence. Illinois imposes a two-year statute of limitations on dog bite injury claims. This essentially means that you must file your lawsuit within two years from the date of the dog bite to be eligible for any compensation. Filing after this period may result in forfeiture of your right to sue.

Lastly, how much can you actually expect to receive as compensation following a dog bite injury? It varies greatly case by case, as it depends upon multiple factors such as medical costs, psychological trauma experienced, loss of earning capacity and more. But rest assured it’s Carlson Bier mission help obtain maximum entitled under law navigate through convoluted processes required so that justice could served fully justly without compromise not closure only but also healing process.

We urge you now; if you’ve been victimized by a dog’s attack or know someone who has, don’t let this incident overshadow your life with grief and financial burden—trust Carlson Bier’s seasoned personal injury lawyers guide provide expert legal assistance every turn take first towards recovery path reassurance knowing fight rights dedication perseverance couragegy click button below discover much worth fighting ensure will get kind representation deserve nothing less than best stand allegations face turmoil see light at end tunnel once again with us by side strive make life better illuminating legalities daunting task give hope where seems lost our promise commitment each every client come doors ready get what due zeal determination proficiency hands find peace mind at last.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Belmont Cragin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Belmont Cragin

Areas of Practice in Belmont Cragin

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Giving professional legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Providing expert legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Fall Mishaps

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for hurts and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Incident

Offering specialist legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Traumas

Focused on extending compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Expert in supporting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440