FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Benld

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a bicycle accident around Benld, look no further than Carlson Bier, your top-notch choice for legal representation. Our firm specializes in personal injury law and is adept at handling Bicycle Accidents cases with utmost precision and dedication. We understand the aftermath of such incidents can be life-altering – physically, emotionally, and financially. That’s where we step up to uphold your rights – fighting tirelessly for the compensation deserved! Even though our physical base is not within Benld city limits due to Illinois compliance regulations regarding advertisements, rest assured that we extend our hands-on approach representing clients here in Benld too; thus making geographical boundaries irrelevant when it comes to justice! At Carlson Bier’s capable hands guided by extensive experience, you’re not just another case number but an individual with genuine concerns seeking fair retribution. So when searching for a trustworthy avenue after unsought Bicycle Accidents led havoc near or within Benld area remember this name: Carlson Bier – optimally primed to guide you through these tumultuous times towards brighter tomorrows.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Benld Illinois

In the bustling state of Illinois, bicycling is more than just a leisure activity — it’s a lifestyle, a mode of transportation and means to maintain fitness. However, sharing the road with motorized vehicles often puts cyclists at high risk for accidents. Unfortunately, in such mishaps, bikers are vulnerable to severe injury or even fatality due to the lack of physical protection that cars provide their drivers.

At Carlson Bier Associates, LLC., our priority is advocating for those who’ve been affected by these unforeseen incidents and ensuring they receive rightful restitution. Our vast experience dealing with personal injury cases in Illinois affords us an unmatched level of expertise when representing victims of bicycle accidents.

Understanding liability is crucial following a bicycle accident; whether pinned down under thousands-of-pounds vehicle or thrown off onto an unforgiving pavement — cyclists often bear the brunt physically. The negligent party could be liable on several fronts: driving under the influence; reckless behavior like speeding or tailgating; distracted driving ranging from texting while driving or not recognizing traffic symbols.

Bicycle accident injuries can range from minor abrasions and broken bones to severe conditions like head trauma or spinal cord defects. With potentially lifelong implications that go beyond immediate medical costs – including loss of income potential, long-term recovery therapies, emotional distress – pursuing legal justice becomes indispensable:

* In-depth exploration and assessment of your case details

* Thorough documentation from police reports and eyewitness accounts

* A comprehensive understanding of cycling rules within Illinois’ jurisdictions helping establish default accountability

* Close collaboration with healthcare professionals to estimate recuperation expenses accurately

* Determination towards securing maximum compensation across every impact factor

Our commitment is unequivocal from start-to-finish: we initiate insurance negotiations on your behalf aimed at fair settlement evaluation favoring your best interests; however, if these trials fall short or if you’re denied claims unfairly where merits exist – court litigation remains open as recourse.

Like any legal endeavor, a statute of limitations governs personal injury cases, including bicycle accidents. While the typical period is two years following an accident within Illinois, certain situational aspects might truncate this timeline – lending more reason why experienced legal representation by Carlson Bier Associates guarantees timeliness in filings and proceedings for rightful damage recovery.

With our ‘No Fee Unless Successful’ approach synonymous to ‘contingency fee’, you’re spared stress of upfront costs as we weather the complexities together towards your deserved claim victory.

Moreover, varied scenarios mark potential eligibility amongst recipients such as directly affected victims or immediate family members where loved ones have been fatally impacted. Each situation possesses unique attributes commanding personalized attention – a norm passionately honored at Carlson Bier with our dedicated team.

Carlson Bier addresses not just your past ordeal but ensures future preparedness mutually: educating cyclists about Illinois-specific cycling regulations promoting responsible practices while navigating mixed traffic; recommending optimal insurance coverage reflecting on shared past experiences; addressing potential short-term and long-term expenses connected to the incident – paving way towards an empowered tomorrow despite today’s adversities.

We urge you not to navigate these intricate channels alone. An unfortunate event doesn’t necessarily translate into unfortunate circumstances when backed by seasoned expertise and compassionate advocacy served only at Carlson Bier Associates. By clicking below, ascertain what compensation could rectify uncertainties rooted in seemingly unjust conditions – acknowledging that every case’s value equates beyond dollars but dignified life restoration thereafter. Our unwavering support pivots on understanding individual concerns bridged with exemplary legal proficiency favoring client welfare — consistently matching success precedents echoing trust inherent within each Illinois community we’ve had the privilege to serve diligently thus far.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Benld Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Benld

Areas of Practice in Benld

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Providing adept legal assistance for patients of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal representation for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Trip Accidents

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents obtain just settlement for hurts and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Concentrated on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Focused on extending dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Committed to supporting victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​