...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Blue Mound

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the overwhelming aftermath of a dog bite injury in Blue Mound, there is one law firm you can count on for unparalleled representation – Carlson Bier. Our group brings an astonishing record of success and unwavering determination when it comes to pursuing dog bite injury cases with aggressive action, leveraging our familiarity with Illinois’ specific laws. With an incomparable understanding of these complicated scenarios, we remain committed to securing fair restitution while ensuring your legal rights are always respected and protected. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize communicating clearly about every development in the case and providing comprehensive guidance to help victims navigate through this trying time efficiently. We stand united against negligence that results in injuries from respective pet owners, believing firmly that every person deserves to feel safe within their community environment without fearing unprovoked canine attacks. Trusting Carson Bier means choosing empathy matched equally by fierce advocacy as we champion your cause towards recovery and justice; making us your preferred consideration for handling dog bite injuries diligently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Blue Mound Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a committed group of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. Our expertise encompasses an array of personal injury cases, among which dog bite injuries contribute significantly. It’s unsettling how frequently individuals become the unintended victims of such serious incidents. Dog bites can be incredibly traumatic—physically and emotionally—and often lead to severe injuries. Understanding this complex area of law is crucial for those who have suffered dog bite injuries.

Victims suffering from these grave circumstances should promptly seek medical assistance to prevent any infection or long-term health complications arising from the wound. We highly stress that the subsequent steps include reporting your case to local authorities whilst gathering evidence (photos of injuries and accident locations), collecting information about the dog owner, and securing witness statements if available.

Illinois holds distinct laws pertaining to dog bites. With our extensive experience as personal injury lawyers, we can provide you with clear insight into these proceedings:

• Illinois exercises strict liability regarding dog bites — meaning the victim doesn’t need to demonstrate that the owner was negligent or knew their pet would bite.

• If bitten by someone else’s pet on public property—or while legally present on private property—the victim has a rightful claim for compensation.

• Provocation is one exception — if it can be proven that a person provoked the animal leading up to an attack, they may lose their right to compensation under Illinois law.

As professionals deeply grounded in understanding personal injury policies in Illinois especially concerning Dog Bite Injuries, we at Carlson Bier harness this knowledge not only effectively but empathetically when representing our clients. Navigating such intricate pathways isn’t easy—especially for victims burdened under post-trauma physical pain and emotional distress—but rest assured, our legal litigators strive relentlessly to obtain justified verdicts aptly favouring our client’s cause.

Legal complexities around such unfortunate incidents vary depending on individual case specifics; hence every lawsuit demands custom-focused strategies—a methodological approach that our firm has perfected over the years. We facilitate deep, methodical discussions to understand your case’s unique aspects before charting actionable legal plans that navigate effectively towards winning rightful claims.

Securing monetary compensation can alleviate your undue suffering from dog bite injuries—it covers medical costs, emotional distress, lost wages due to missing work, and more. ARely on our seasoned personal injury attorneys’ expertise at Carlson Bier—we assure you astute guidance through these complicated proceedings whilst focusing on procuring the highest possible financial restitution for your inflicted losses.

Those affected by such unfortunate incidents could suffer significant physical harm—lacerations/scarring, nerve damage or psychological trauma alongside hefty treatment expenses. This makes it imperative that victims receive a thorough understanding of their rights under Illinois state law aiding them in securing legitimate compensation commensurate with their ordeal’s nature and its accompanying repercussions.

Carlson Bier is here for you as dedicated allies ready to stand beside you throughout your journey toward justice following a dog bite incident. If this material rings relatable and sparks any queries about our expert services regarding Dog Bite Injuries or otherwise under personal injury law, we encourage you to leverage our expertise honed through time-intense practice in Illinois jurisdiction specifically tailored around the said subject matter.

We invite you to explore further by clicking on the button below—a guided pathway awaits, designed exclusively towards helping you understand what your case is worth financially within the realms of admissible claim norms outlined under injury laws pertaining specifically within Illinois regions. Count on us—we are eager to put forth our accumulated knowledge in personal injury policies inclining towards effective solution rendering focused primarily upon client interests above everything else. Now’s not the time for added stress; let professionals handle the complexities while focussing squarely upon making a healthy recovery post misfortunate instances of gruesome occurrences like dog bite injuries.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Blue Mound Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Blue Mound

Areas of Practice in Blue Mound

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering professional legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Fall Injuries

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents obtain just remuneration for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Crash

Delivering expert legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Construction Crashes

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to extending expert legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Committed to defending clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​