...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bolingbrook

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When contending with dog bite injuries in Bolingbrook, Carlson Bier is an indispensable legal ally. As personal injury attorneys, our proficiency isn’t confined by geography – we handle cases throughout Illinois, including those needing representation for dog bite injuries in Bolingbrook. Our law firm possesses the specialized knowledge and considerable experience to navigate the intricacies of these often sensitive and complicated claims effectively. From securing medical expense recovery to fighting for non-economic damages related to emotional distress caused by a traumatic event; Carlson Bier meticulously ensures that every argument is robustly presented at your benefit. Our commitment extends beyond simply winning cases: we strive towards providing peace of mind amidst challenging circumstances. Consider Carlson Bier—dedicated advocates who will go above and beyond as they endeavor compassionately yet unrelentingly towards achieving a just resolution on your behalf when dealing with dog bite incidents—a formidable legal match against any challenge faced within this realm.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bolingbrook Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we represent individuals who have been victim of dog bite injuries with passion and vigorous advocacy. As Illinois based personal injury attorneys, our expertise lies in plumbing the depths of the complexities of these cases to help clients leverage justice.

One key detail that many overlook is severity. Just how severe was the canine assault? A minor nip may lead to little more than an insignificant scratch, but a serious mauling can cause far-reaching physical and psychological harm, revealing itself through extensive medical bills and mental agony. It’s crucial for every potential client to understand where they fall on this spectrum because it determines lawsuit validity.

Another critical aspect is identifying liability. Who exactly bore responsibility during the incident? In most instances it falls onto the pet owner’s shoulders but not absolutely always. There might be certain exceptional scenarios such as when someone else had control over dog at that time or when the victim was provoking the animal intentionally.

Remember, reporting dog bites is imperative in Illinois. Don’t allow any delay in reaching out to local law enforcement agencies or animal control services after a dog bite attack has occurred. Timely action like this enables accurate documentation—which solidifies your claim legitimacy—and helps prevent future casualties from same perpetrator.

Also note that under Another Illinois’ Animal Control Act victims needn’t demonstrate negligence on part of dog owners/keepers in order to recover damages; so long as injury isn’t provoked by victim and occurs either when they’re peaceably conducting themselves in places they legally are permitted access to, or while performing tasks lawfully directed them toward doing so including mail carriers- then there would be cause for compensatory relief from liable party/s.

Medical documentation is another cornerstone element required for building a substantial case against person(s) responsible for your dog-bite injury. Seek immediate medical attention irrespective of perceived injury extent because a mere scratch today could swiftly snowball into an infective ailment requiring comprehensive treatment tomorrow which will reflect appropriately in your medical reports.

Just as critical are situational factors. What circumstances led to the biting? Was there provocation involved or did this ensue while you were lawfully on another person’s property when dog attacked? Illinois law offers recourse when victim is peaceably acting, and unprovoked but bitten nevertheless.

It’s worth mentioning that statutes of limitation do apply in dog bite injury cases. The clock starts ticking from date of incident so getting professional legal help sooner rather than later can deliver a decisive advantage.

At Carlson Bier, our focus involves channeling these crucial elements into an actionable roadmap designed to achieve successful case results for our valued clientele. We diligently manage every single aspect—whether minor or major–understanding well that each intricacy analysed could swing tide favorably toward our clients.

We harness detailed scrutiny, dedicated research and decades-long invaluable experience for ensuring that victims of dog-bite injuries accumulate maximum compensation they duly deserve for their physical maladies and emotional suffering. While no amount can truly offset pain endured amidst such traumatic experiences, we deeply believe in principle that unabating advocacy helps catalyse effective justice served—which means substantial financial recovery clients are entitled to under Illinois laws!

Are you dealing with repercussions after a dog attack bite? If it’s affirmative then don’t hesitate; Contact us right now! An initial consultation wouldn’t cost anything at all but refusal will definitely cost opportunities missed over securing rightful compensation due lost wages,pain & suffering or steeply escalating medical bills ever since fateful canine assault occurred.

So why wait longer on sidelines nursing regrets instead of proactively marching toward desired justice armed with powerful support by your side via Carlson Bier – specialists devoted earnestly around championing cause for people just like you!

Click below to find out how much your case might be worth—you owe it to yourself and loved ones affected gravely amidst trying circumstances unfolding after vicious dog attack assaults vicariously…

All set? Then let’s get started right now together…!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bolingbrook Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bolingbrook

Areas of Practice in Bolingbrook

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Giving professional legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Slip Occurrences

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain just settlement for damages and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Truck Collision

Offering professional legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Focused on offering dedicated legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to defending clients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer