...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Bolingbrook

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing a medical malpractice situation in Bolingbrook? Carlson Bier is your committed advocate. For years, we have represented patients who have suffered due to medical negligence, securing them the compensation they deserve. Our seasoned team of attorneys specializes solely in personal injury law, particularly focusing on cases related to medical malpractice. We are highly experienced and adept at navigating through complex legal procedures while aggressively defending our clients’ rights every single step of the way. With our skilled approach and relentless dedication, we pride ourselves on being one of Illinois’ leading choices for professional representation against healthcare providers or facilities accused of misconduct or lapses in standard care protocols. Whether you’re dealing with misdiagnosis issues or surgical errors; rest assured that Carlson Bier’s expertise stands front and center when it comes to safeguarding your interests efficiently and effectively during these trying times – because your health matters matter most! Choose us as your champion today for unrivaled support throughout each stage across this challenging journey.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Bolingbrook Illinois

At the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, we specialize in navigating complex claims imperatives for victims of medical malpractice in Illinois. Medical malpractice involves instances where patients are harmed by doctors or other healthcare professionals due to negligence or omission when implementing care and treatment procedures.

Medical malpractices can manifest in an array of nuances; from misdiagnosis to birth injuries, surgical errors, medication mishaps, and inadequate follow-up care. Misdiagnosis is a common form indicating physicians’ failure to identify a patient’s health problem correctly leading to incorrect treatment, delayed remedy, or no therapeutic measures at all. Birth injuries arise from oversights made during childbirth which may manifest immediately or later as developmental issues affecting the child’s wellness and quality of life. Surgical faults could include irrelevant surgeries conducted upon the wrong body part or causing unintended damage while performing the surgery. Medication mistakes involve administering incorrect dosages that might usually lead to serious side effects on patients ranging from harmful reactions with existing drug intake to adverse life-threatening conditions.

When it comes to legal representation after such medical negligence has occurred, our capable team steps in confidently armed with extensive understanding about this practice area within personal injury law. Here are some key elements you need ensuring your lawsuit’s success:

• Proof of Doctor-Patient Relationship: Documented evidence proving your engagement with the doctor whom you allege committed the negligence.

• Negligence Verification: Provide substantiation showing how standard healthcare was deviated.

• Injury Directly Caused by the Negligence: Demonstrable proof illustrating that injuries were incurred directly due to practitioner’s deviation from normative care protocols.

• Physical Harm/Economic Loss Resulting from Injury[NP1]: Tangible proof highlighting emotional trauma, physical pain, cost implications due to loss wages etc., attributable principally because of inflicted harm.

Another critical determinant informing successful claims negotiation encompasses an appreciation concerning limitations statutes particular within Illinois jurisdiction contexts relating medical malpractice incidents. The laws necessitate filing claims within two years of the incidence’s date or discovery of said bodily harm. Moreover, you should bear in mind that no lawsuits can be instituted beyond a four-year time frame subsequent to alleged malpractice events.

At Carlson Bier, we’re compelled by our collective legal prowess to secure expedient claim resolution for medical malpractices’ victims – and ensuring appropriate compensation is sought corresponding each unique circumstance prevailing your respective instance. Our dedicated lawyers offer a comprehensive suite of representations commencing with initial case evaluation sessions, providing insightful guidance concerning prospective claim prospects; undertaking meticulous critical facts’ analyses worthwhile fortifying lawsuit strengths hence increasing potential successful outcomes chances.

Your path to rightful justice begins here at Carlson Bier. While our professional tableau comprises rich experiential backgrounds spanning diverse personal injury subspecialties – herein Medical Malpractice spearhead domain remains among foremost key practice strength areas where our uniqueness ultimately thrives best!

Finally, It’s essential to demystify assumed notions implying approaching law firms initiates colossal financial constraints before any tangible results materialize! At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on implementing conditional fee agreements (“no win-no fee”). The pact essentially suggests unless your claims are successfully resolved favorably from resultant awarded damages – no attorney fees applicability arises.

If you have been subjected to medical malpractice or believe someone close might fall victim thereof – allow us guide you through this challenging uncertainty cosmos whilst striving tirelessly pursuing deserved justice avowal on behalf allocated clients’ mandate ensure all-round reparation objectives satisfaction affirmatively catered as triggered incidents account!

Seize today’s vital moment establishing first integral stepping-stone toward realizing justified fairness rightfully crucial following life-upsetting medial negligence encounters; Click on the button below now for free totally commitment non-obligatory consultations ascertaining your case’s possible worth precisely gauging fiscal implications overarching ensuing holistic remediation pursuits commencement.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Bolingbrook Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Bolingbrook

Areas of Practice in Bolingbrook

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing professional legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Fall Occurrences

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking justice for their injuries.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for hurts and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Incident

Providing adept legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in ensuring professional legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Specialized in managing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to assisting clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer