FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Bolingbrook

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or a loved one, have suffered a spinal cord injury in Bolingbrook, trust Carlson Bier to secure the justice and compensation you deserve. As Illinois’s outstanding legal advocates specializing in complex spinal cord injuries cases, our expertise is unrivaled. Our accomplished attorneys understand the debilitating life changes that come with such an event – the physical pain and emotional trauma marks just a fraction of it. Aiming to alleviate your burden wherever possible, we go above and beyond expectations by relentlessly pursuing all liable parties while ensuring comprehensive long-term care plans are put into place for victims. Every step of your case will be intelligently managed from investigating causes to proving negligence ensuring optimum results whilst prioritizing your best interests at all times. Choosing Carlson Bier means aligning yourself with formidable courtroom reputation coupled with compassionate client service exemplifying why we are among Illinois’ top choices for representation in catastrophic accident scenarios involving Spinal Cord Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Bolingbrook Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law and understand the multifaceted complexities that accompany cases involving spinal cord injuries. In Illinois, where our expertise is based, we bring extensive experience and compassion to those seeking legal guidance following such life-altering incidents.

Spinal Cord Injuries are often catastrophic events with profound impact on an individual’s quality of life. The central role of the spine in facilitating movement means a damage can result in partial or complete paralysis. Paraplegia affects the lower limbs while tetraplegia (or quadriplegia) impacts both arms and legs. Moreover, individuals might also face secondary conditions including respiratory issues, pain and spasms, pressure sores as well as bowel or bladder dysfunction.

• Always remember: any form of trauma to the spine necessitates immediate medical attention.

• If you suspect a Spinal Cord Injury, minimize movement to reduce further harm – this includes both the affected person as well as potential items causing pressure or penetration.

• Call for emergency medical assistance immediately without delay.

Depending on circumstances surrounding your Spinal Cord Injury, if another party’s negligence or intentional wrongdoing is concluded to be responsible then it may provide grounds for filing a personal injury lawsuit. With Carlson Bier by your side, we will strive towards ensuring appropriate litigation measures—establishing liability through thorough investigation and presenting compelling evidence to support your claim for damages.

In typical claims related to Spinal Cord Injuries, victims may seek compensation for:

• Medical expenses resulting from initial treatment and ongoing care

• Loss of income due to inability to work

• Pain suffering caused directly by the injury

• Psychological distress endured due to drastic changes in lifestyle

Navigating through these challenges may seem daunting; however understanding that options exist can bring comfort during such difficult times. At Carlson Bier, when handling Spinal Cord Injury claims under Personal Injury Law domain—we approach from a perspective of profound acknowledgment for the life-changing gravity these injuries bear. Our goal is to ensure clients are equipped with requisite knowledge of their rights and potential legal pathways ahead.

At this juncture, you may be wondering about the worth of your personal injury case. This is not uncommon as every personal injury claim differs based on numerous factors including severity of injury, associated medical expenses, extent of liability and more. It’s essential to engage with an experienced law firm that understands these nuances and can guide you appropriately through such complex matters while ensuring maximum compensation entitlements.

In Illinois, Carlson Bier stands at the forefront as experts in Personal Injury Law dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries—committed to helping our clients secure fair compensation as well as justice they rightfully deserve. We understand just how much it can mean to have the comfort of knowing you’re backed by a team determined to fight relentlessly for your cause.

As we strive towards providing value-added service—from aiding understanding around complexities linked with spinal cord injuries, through marshalling cogent evidence supporting your claim—to eventually securing fitting reparation; trust us when we say: You don’t have to traverse this path alone. Allow our dedicated team at Carlson Bier assist you in steering clear amidst turbulent times following a Spinal Cord Injury incident.

When entrusting us with representing your interests during such crucially significant moment in life—we won’t merely advocate; but also equip with resources catering towards reclaiming stability post-trauma maximally possible way! So why wait any longer? Click on the button below now! Taken this step today provides empowerment entailing awareness surrounding rights under Illinois law along potentials for due compensation—all relative to circumstances surrounding your unique case. If considering whether pursuing action related specifically towards Spinal Cord Injury claims, know well: At Carlson Bier—we’re here fighting for YOU!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bolingbrook Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Bolingbrook

Areas of Practice in Bolingbrook

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving specialist legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending professional legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for damages and losses.

Bike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Semi Crash

Delivering expert legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Focused on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Trauma

Expert in representing victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​