Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Breese

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we stand as a beacon of hope and justice for victims of spinal cord injuries. As a premier personal injury law firm in Illinois, our expertise extends to robust representation on spinal cord injuries cases. Our seasoned attorneys know how catastrophic these accidents can be – physically, emotionally, financially. It’s why we relentlessly work towards securing maximum compensation for medical expenses, lost income and the pains suffered by you or your loved ones.

Navigating through the complex landscape of personal injury law can be challenging but not with Carlson Bier at your side.We meticulously address every detail regarding the liability, insurance issues and rehabilitation resources vital to your case.

In Breese particularly it has been noticed that there is heightened need for adept legal assistance – this is where we come in; advocating fiercely to ensure rights aren’t trampled upon.

Though countless firms might promise results—few deliver like Carlson Bier. Because here; client’s welfare isn’t just priority- it’s our passion! Trust us to turn adversities into victories because when it comes to spinal cord injuries litigation: We don’t just represent you; We fight FOR you!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Breese Illinois

Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm in Illinois, is ardently committed to providing in-depth and practical information on various legal topics. Today, we shine a spotlight on spinal cord injuries—one of the most devastating life-altering events a person can experience.

Spinal Cord Injuries refer to damage sustained by the spinal cord that results in temporary or permanent changes in its function. These injuries can cover a wide range of symptoms, from chronic pain all the way to complete paralysis. The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center reports an estimated 17,810 new spinal cord injury cases each year—an alarming statistic indeed.

• THE CRUCIAL ASPECTS: While anyone can suffer from spinal cord injuries due to accidents or illnesses, it typically results from significant trauma such as motor vehicle crashes, falls, and sports-related activities—a stark reminder for everyone towards vehicular safety and adequate precautions during physical activities.

• GRASPING THE CLASSIFICATIONS: Spinal cord injuries are generally classified into two categories—’complete’ where almost all feeling (sensory) and control ability (motor) below the level of injury are lost; ‘incomplete’ when some sensory or motor functions persist beneath affected areas.

One extremely relevant thing to understand about these high-stakes health crises pertains to their far-reaching implications—not only physically but also financially and psychologically. Medical costs associated with this type of damage are often astronomical—initial hospitalization alone potentially exceeds $140k according to recent estimates—and lifelong care needs for serious cases could run into millions.

Mounting medical bills coupled with additional indirect expenses like rehabilitation services, assistive devices plus loss of income create a financial strain that can suffocate overall life quality, plunging victims and families into hardship abyss they never saw coming.

Your emotional well-being isn’t excluded either—the psychological impact of drastically modified lifestyles following catastrophic accidents invariably leads survivors through distress circuit—from anxiety over the uncertainty of their medical situation to depression and all-encompassing feelings of grief from lost functionings. This landscape, for all its dark intensity, is far too common.

At this point, many people wonder—’What can be done? How does one cope with such an unfathomable circumstance?’ The answer lies in your ability to seek accurate legal representation that understands the depth and seriousness of a spinal cord injury case; lawyers who empathetically bear your burden while fighting relentlessly for your fair compensation.

Carlson Bier’s personal injury attorneys possess the expertise to handle these complex situations directly and effectively. Our team embodies diligence and determination—upholding client rights protected under Illinois law while single-mindedly pursuing rightful claim settlements.

In a sea of uncertainty, we choose empathy over indifference—we do not merely witness clients become statistics or names on rosters but perceive them as individuals carrying deeply personal battles. Equipped with experience sharpened by years handling similar cases across varying circumstances, Carlson Bier handles every case uniquely—taking our cue from clients’ needs rather than ready-made formulas.

Engagement with us guarantees comprehensive counsel concerning insurance intricacies, claim procedures plus possible litigation steps. We champion transparent communication ensuring every avenue is explored and no stone unturned—in equivalence: optimally favorable outcomes hand-crafted on tailored strategies reflecting unique profiles each presents.

Our goal transcends securing optimal settlements—it involves helping victims regain control over lives thrust into disarray…to find stability within chaos…to see hope beyond despair…for true recovery goes beyond physical—aiding trauma-stricken souls reclaim fragmented pieces till semblance of pre-injury normalcy restores.

The next step is yours! To learn about how much your spinal cord injury case could potentially be worth, don’t hesitate a moment longer! Click the button below—an insightful peek into prospects awaiting with Carlson Bie awaits you today! Secure holistic victory—physical healing laced with financial recompense facilitated by a team unwavering in commitment to justice served. Trust Carlson Bier; our practice transforms lives, reestablishes dignity and revives dreams—officially.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Breese Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Breese

Areas of Practice in Breese

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing specialist legal advice for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying specialist legal guidance to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Tumble Incidents

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents gain equitable settlement for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Incidents

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Crash

Delivering adept legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Undeserved Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Focused on defending persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer