...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Bunker Hill

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we bring unparalleled expertise to the legal realm of Spinal Cord Injuries. Our team possesses profound knowledge in this complex area of personal injury law, understanding that spinal cord injuries can be devastating and life-changing events. As a revered law firm based in Illinois, our specialized approach means we navigate the multilayered regulations with savviness and tenacity each step along your journey towards justice.

As no accident is alike, neither should be your representation – herein lies the raison d’etre for choosing Carlson Bier as your advocate during such challenging times. Every nuance matters when seeking rightful compensation; our proficiency ensures an adaptive strategy striving for optimal results tailored to each case’s unique circumstances.

We offer comprehensive legal solutions aimed at addressing both immediate concerns and future consequences relating to spinal cord injuries. Our commitment transcends mere professional services – it reaches into forming a solid partnership dedicated to securing restitution commensurate with unprecedented changes facing you or your loved one’s life after a severe incident.

Choose Carlson Bier – where excellence isn’t just our standard; it defines who we are in advocating steadfastly on behalf of those affected by spinal cord injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Bunker Hill Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in handling personal injury cases with an emphasis on Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). Our accomplished Illinois-based team understands the magnitude of living with a spinal cord injury and realizing how drastically life can alter post-injury. We firmly believe that our clients deserve strong representation to ensure they receive fair compensation for their physical and emotional damages.

Let’s talk about spinal cord injuries – These are severe types of bodily harm that mainly affect your spine’s neural elements, inhibiting signals between your brain and body parts. A union affecting function or mobility indicates an SCI; however, it doesn’t necessarily mean complete paralysis. The severity varies from mild loss of motor function to total incapacitation. There are two main classifications of such injuries:

• Complete: A complete SCI results in a total loss of sensory and motor function below the level where damage has occurred.

• Incomplete: An incomplete SCI means there is some functioning below the primary level of injury.

The effects can range from severe chronic pain and respiratory issues to bladder control problems or sexual dysfunction. It’s also common to experience psychological trauma such as stress, depression and anxiety due to significant lifestyle changes.

One crucial aspect we focus on amidst legal ramifications is distinguishing between these different forms when formulating litigation strategies; this plays a decisive role in dictating appropriate compensation for medical bills, rehab costs, lost wages as well as pain and suffering induced by the drastic lifestyle changes linked with these injuries.

Prevention is indeed better than cure; taking precautions like wearing seatbelts while driving incidents might save one from substantial injuries . However accidents are inevitable ,if unfortunate circumstances lead you into acquiring SCI its vital you associate yourself with reputable affiliates who comprehend your predicament intimately hence laying groundwork for comprehensive solutions .

At Carlson Bier getting justice isn’t just professional but personal too ; Our attorneys possess substantial experience commissioned towards helping victims recover deserved damages associated with SCIs – whether through resilient negotiation or strenuous litigation if necessary.

In recap, Carlson Bier offers a specialized approach when dealing with SCI cases in Illinois; understanding that every case has unique circumstances. We cater to both the physical and emotional trauma of our clients steering them through an unfamiliar legal process, ensuring they have someone at their side who genuinely cares about their recovery.

There’s no disguising SCI’s profound impact on your life and wellbeing. Yet, you don’t have to navigate these choppy waters alone. The accomplished team at Carlson Bier stands as your dependable pillar during trying times, committed to securing the best possible outcome for you.

If you or a loved one is grappling with SCI due to someone else’s negligence, do not hesitate to get in touch today. Now that you’re better informed about spinal cord injuries and their potential implications – arm yourself further by leveraging qualified representation from expert attorneys waiting eagerly to assist with your queries.

Click on the button below and gain insights about what compensation could mean for you; remember – knowledge truly is power when considering pursuing justice cost-effectively based on individual prerequisites . Respectfully acting within Illinois law parameters we look forward to meeting , serving you optimal lawful outcomes hence easing some of this new-found burden placed upon your shoulders.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Bunker Hill Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Bunker Hill

Areas of Practice in Bunker Hill

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending expert legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing professional legal services for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents get just compensation for damages and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Mishap

Providing professional legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Building Site Crashes

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on delivering compassionate legal representation for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Expert in assisting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer