...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Burnham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to managing the fallout from a dog bite injury, one needs experienced representation. Carlson Bier stands as the best choice for Illinois citizens in Burnham dealing with such incidences. With extensive knowledge of Illinois law and specifics relating to dog bite injuries, we offer unparalleled expertise and advocacy. We understand the emotional and financial impact that these incidents can bring; this fuels our passion for bringing you justice, guided by ethical standards. Our well-seasoned attorneys are prepared to fight relentlessly on your behalf, ensuring you obtain deserved compensation through diligent legal procedures. Vast testimonials affirm complete trust in us – an affirmation of our track record of results-oriented litigation solutions in personal injury cases including but not limited to dog bites! Close geographic proximity ensures timely calls-to-action while maintaining exceptional service delivery standards within legal boundaries. Choose Carlson Bier: advocating proficiency beyond borders!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Burnham Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to defending the rights of individuals who have suffered unexpected damages or injuries. Among the many areas of personal injury law that our firm specializes in is Dog Bite Injuries, a prevalent form of injury that can lead to severe physical and emotional scars. It’s vital for victims to understand their legal rights and options when it comes to dog bite cases in Illinois.

When a dog bites, injures or otherwise harms a person, potential civil liability for these actions resides with the animal’s owner. According to the Illinois Animal Control Act, owners are held strictly liable if their pet attacks an individual. It implies that even if an owner wasn’t negligent nor knew about the likelihood of their pet biting people still holds them responsible for any harm incurred due to their pet’s action.

Key points about this strict liability standard include:

• The victim does not need to prove negligence on part of the owner.

• The family member taking care of the animal could also be held responsible if they had prior knowledge about the animal’s aggressive nature.

• This concept applies even if it was the first time for such behavior by the pet.

Moreover, every case is unique accounting factors like human interaction before attack; misconceptions regarding breed temperament or conflicts over trespassing among others which sometimes makes put forth successful defense necessary against unjustified claims.

However, after sustaining injuries from a dog bite incident, here are steps you should immediately follow:

– Seeking immediate medical attention: Bite wounds can result in serious infections if not treated immediately, plus medical records serve as significant evidence supporting your claim.

– Reporting incident: Notify local authorities about animal attack promptly ensuring appropriate record keeping.

– Capturing visual documentation: Photographs illustrating injury severity helps your attorney articulately negotiate insurance companies offering lower settlements.

– Gathering witness statements: If others witnessed event effectively collate their accounts helping build strong case foundation.

Being attacked by a dog often involves more than just physical injuries. Emotional trauma and psychological issues can also occur and may last far longer than the physical injuries. It’s vital to understand that you are eligible for compensation to cover not only your medical expenses but also potential emotional distress, lost wages if you’re unable to work due to your injury, scars or disfigurement, reduced quality of life among others.

Our Illinois dog bite lawyers at Carlson Bier work diligently aiming delivering justice every client deserves. We strive understanding clients’ unique circumstances closely helping us effectively represent them while ensuring a thorough investigation is conducted gathering evidence supporting claim successfully proving liability rests with dog owner thus creating opportunity claiming fair amount damages deserved against all losses incurred.

At Carlson Bier, we fully comprehend intricacy involving personal injury claims; hence our experts will guide each step rendering process less overwhelming managing paperwork, negotiating settlements on behalf proving validity of your pain & suffering before jury if case progresses trial level.

As seasoned personal injury attorneys in Illinois, our mission is presenting a concrete narrative about your experience pursuing maximum compensation available under law by placing highest obtainable importance over clients’ needs; empathizing their ordeal whilst maintaining complete transparency throughout legal journey.

Don’t let uncertainty refrain from exploring best possible options upholding rightful claim – unearth whether getting reimbursed for traumatic experience suffered meting out fair justice indeed feasible consequently altering what might have appeared as bleak episode into possibility of hope. Notwithstanding seriousness accompanying such grievous harm encountered, click on button below today setting course ultimately arriving towards obtaining desired restitution tantamount unraveling affirmative potential entwined within adverse encounter transforming it into supportive financial assistance rightfully owed replacing despair with solace prominently attained fulfilling comprehensive recovery aspiration envisaged restoring wholesome existence once held dear eventually enabling resume normalcy unhindered.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Burnham Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Burnham

Areas of Practice in Burnham

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing expert legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering expert legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Tumble Incidents

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents obtain fair settlement for damages and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Big Rig Accident

Offering adept legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Building Accidents

Engaged in representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to extending expert legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Focused on defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer