...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Burnham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to navigating the complexities of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) cases, Carlson Bier’s expertise stands as a benchmark in Burnham. With an outstanding track record and rich experience, our legal team has excelled at representing clients facing life-altering SCIs with determination and sensitivity. Our comprehensive knowledge enables us to efficiently delve into medical reports, interview witnesses and engage experts crucial for building a solid case. Underpinning our practice is understanding the severe impact SCIs exert on individuals’ lives; hence we are deeply committed to pursuing maximum compensation for victims’ plights – from hospital expenses to lost wages and beyond — seeking justice that you deserve.

Undeniably, choosing Carlson Bier translates into leveraging seasoned professionals who bring strategic thinking alongside compassion – making us exceptional advocates during such challenging times. While remuneration can never truly compensate physical trauma endured due to SCI’s tragic consequences – success lies in restoring some semblance of prior normalcy within these struggles; that’s precisely what we, at Carlson Bier aim towards achieving for each client entrusted into our care.Don’t face your fight alone; let us stand by your side offering resolute support every step along this arduous journey.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Burnham Illinois

Spinal cord injuries are severe, life-altering occurrences which require expert legal representation to ensure a victim’s rights are protected. At Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys, located in Illinois, are dedicated to advocating for individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries because of someone else’s negligence. We bring wealth of experience and genuine commitment to securing justice on your behalf.

Addressing the severity and impact of spinal cord injuries is essential when discussing their implications. These types of injuries often result from various incidents such as motor vehicle accidents, sports-related accidents or falls, violence such as gunshot wounds, and medical malpractice among others. Some key points about these traumatic injuries include:

•They often lead to partial or complete paralysis: quadriplegia (arms and legs inability) or paraplegia (legs and lower body impairment).

•Recovery can be long-term if not permanent with continuous rehabilitative care necessary over months or even years.

•The cost of treatment for these injuries can spiral into millions with increased financial strain given that the injured party might be unable to work indefinitely.

Our goal at Carlson Bier is to put our clients’ minds at ease by alleviating the burden caused by this daunting path towards recovery while seeking compensation that matches the gravity of their circumstances. The damages pursued in a spine injury claim may include medical expenses – current and future ones -, loss of earning capacity; pain suffering emotional distress; home adjustments required due to changes in mobility; vocational rehabilitation; therapy costs amongst other associated expenditures.

In providing professional representation during these trying times, we first conduct a meticulous investigation into how the incident occurred so as to establish fault conclusively. Collecting detailed evidence which includes accident reports, witness statements along with scouring over all medical records aids us in painting an accurate picture of what transpired.

Additionally, collaborating closely with leading experts such as neurologists and neuropsychologists becomes invaluable when quantifying loss comprehensively. These professionals provide technical knowledge about the extent of related injuries, future care needs and how one’s quality of life may be impacted thereby ensuring that when we advocate for our clients’ compensation claims, no stone is left unturned.

The involvement of insurance companies also forms a key part of this labyrinthine process. While insurers might desire to settle rapidly, quick settlements often underestimate the long-term effects resulting from these injuries and fail to take into account all possible future ramifications both financially and emotionally. Our firm understands the dynamics at play during such negotiations and cuts through these complexities by aggressively advocating for full, fair compensation while keeping you abreast throughout each turn.

Navigating the turbulent waters lethargic with legal jargon can seem overwhelming but having Carlson Bier championing your cause ensures an anchor in professionalism as your voice is heard during this challenge. We are keen on delivering justice even as we empathize with your situation here in Illinois; facing head-on spinal cord injury litigation shrouded with its intricate attendant aspects.

Remember, securing proper representation immediately after such incidents occur aids significantly in collection of crucial evidence necessary for successful litigation while preventing critical drawbacks common in personal injury cases like statute limitation expiry dates among others.

Now that you understand more about spinal cords injuries and what solid legal representation entails – have you mulled over consolidating your claim’s worth? It’s highly essential to evaluate the potential value before marching into court corridors or starting negotiation talks with intimidating insurance representatives.

Therefore, we invite you to find out what your case could be potentially worth by clicking on the button below. At Carlson Bier we fight for not only what you want but essentially what you deserve: justice personified!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Burnham Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Burnham

Areas of Practice in Burnham

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying expert legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Negligence

Delivering professional legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Tumble Accidents

Expert in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for wounds and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Crash

Delivering specialist legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to offering specialized legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Expert in advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​