...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Carmi

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one been the victim of dog bite injuries in Carmi? Seek legal aid immediately from Carlson Bier, an expert group in Dog Bite Injuries law and personal injury cases. Our seasoned attorneys understand the complexity and severity of such incidents and work diligently to secure maximum compensation for our clients. Timing is critical – Illinois laws require that action must be taken within strict timeframes post-incident. With years of experience under their belt, Carlson Bier’s team will navigate this process on your behalf with precision and dedication. We are relentless advocates who fight vehemently for justice while providing compassionate support throughout the process. Your recovery is as crucial to us as seeking rightful accountability on your behalf. Trust no less than the professionals at Carlsson Bier when it comes to dealing with dog bite injuries’ aftermath – because we aren’t just lawyers; we’re partners committed wholly to safeguarding your interests at every step of this difficult journey.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Carmi Illinois

Dog bite injuries can lead to severe physical and emotional trauma coupled with financial burdens due to medical expenses. At Carlson Bier, we are a personal injury attorney group based in Illinois that specializes in addressing these complications tied to dog bite incidents. Our understanding of the prevailing laws enables us to provide expert legal advice, ensuring victims receive fair compensation for their suffering.

Illinois observes strict liability law when it comes to dog bites related personal injuries. This means that the owner of the dog is legally responsible for any harm inflicted by their pet, regardless of whether the canine displayed aggressive behavior before or not. The victim does not have the burden of proving negligence on behalf of the owner; all they need establish is that they were conducting themselves peaceably, without provocation and had every right to be where they were bitten.

Dog bite injuries can vary drastically depending upon severity and circumstances surrounding the incident. Some prevalent concerns include:

• Physical Damage: Lacerations, nerve damage, fractures resulting from a fall during attack.

• Traumatic Stress: The psychological trauma following such an ordeal can be equally damaging if not more.

• Rabies Transmission: The CDC estimates around 60 pets each year transmit this deadly virus.

• Scarring And Disfigurement : Scars may require plastic surgery thereby escalating potential medical costs tremendously.It’s important to note that Illinois statute allows two years post-incident for victims to bring about a lawsuit.

Upon retaining our services at Carlson Bier, we thoroughly investigate your case determining its worth based on factors like nature and extent of your injury alongside loss of earnings (if any). We also approach insurance companies skillfully navigating settlement negotiations often leading towards favorable outcomes for our clients who otherwise would have found themselves lost in complex jargon and procedures.

Emotional support is as essential as providing tenacious representation that makes insurance companies take notice.Our team seeks justice aggressively by presenting well-prepared cases allowing victims compensation that truly correlates with damages sustained.One thing can be insured- at Carlson Bier, you’d never feel alone or unheard.

Victims must understand that compensation from dog bite lawsuits encompasses more than mere hospital bills. Rightfully, the law takes into account time off work (lost wages), emotional distress and future therapy costs while determining adequate recompense. We aim to get you this full compensation so as to enable your journey towards a complete recovery financially and emotionally.

Time is of essence when it comes to personal injury claims. Understanding your rights is crucial in helping expedite legal proceedings. At Carlson Bier, we serve the people of Illinois with compassionate understanding of their predicament coupled with sheer dedication in obtaining fair restitution for those unfortunately finding themselves victim to dog bites.

Don’t let the sizeable insurance lingo overwhelm you after having suffered an unthinkable ordeal – allow us handle that stress, providing expertise and assurance along each step.We don’t just represent; we stand up for your cause relentlessly till justice prevails ensuring restoring normalcy back into your life ensuing trauma becomes less daunting a feat.

Our firm operates on a contingency fee basis which implies we only charge a fee if we successfully win monetary awards or settlements.Your peace of mind matters greatly to us hence free case evaluations are integral part of our commitment towards service.The assurance here reflects that fretting about unaffordable initial consultation fees is one worry off your plate while grappling through such tough times

If you or someone dear have been inflicted by grievous injuries due to dog attacks, act promptly seeking expert legal advice.Ensuring maximum compensation becomes our guiding motto once we take over.Assistance couldn’t be nearer than click on the button below.Take immediate action and find out how much your case could potentially yield.Protecting rights isn’t merely incidental , it forms part of who we are as Carlson Bier attorneys.Stand up against negligence.Deem nothing negligible especially when vested right demands deserving redressal.Resorting to astute professional acumen and expertise, let’s claim together what is rightfully ours!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carmi Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Carmi

Areas of Practice in Carmi

Bicycle Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving adept legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to helping clients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Crash

Providing adept legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in offering dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Focused on advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer