FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Carmi

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When looking for legal representation after suffering a spinal cord injury, it is crucial to choose an attorney that understands the complexity and financial toll such injuries can take. Carlson Bier, based in Illinois, brings years of experience and knowledge to support your case with unwavering commitment. They have helped countless clients navigate through the intricacies of their situations ensuring just compensation for multitudinous medical expenses, lost wages and ongoing rehabilitation costs due to spinal cord injuries. Their dedication extends beyond basic legal responsibilities; they advocate passionately on your behalf while also providing comprehensive guidance throughout this arduous journey. Ensuring you receive optimum treatment options available and addressing queries about future prospects are all part of their holistic approach towards client service. With their unparalleled skills in managing spinal cord injury cases combined with a philosophy centered around ‘client-first’, makes Carlson Bier a superior choice when seeking legal resilience post-spinal trauma incidents within Illinois law’s remits. The depth of empathy coupled with meticulous expertise melds into robust advocacy reflecting why many trust Carlson Bier’s capability.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Carmi Illinois

At Carlson Bier, it is our mission to provide exceptional legal representation and client service for individuals in Illinois suffering from personal injuries. One area of focus for our dedicated team of attorneys includes cases involving spinal cord injuries, a realm requiring not only extensive understanding of the legality but also comprehension regarding intricate medical complexity.

Spinal cord injuries refer to any damage or trauma inflicted upon one’s spinal cord, that vast network of nerves sending and receiving signals from the brain throughout the body. These injuries are unique in their tendency towards life-altering complications. Under such dire circumstances, having knowledgeable legal allies can prove irreplaceable. Everything from the physical impact to emotional distress associated with spinal cord injuries forms crucial aspects when evaluating your case’s potential worth.

The severity level varies with each injury. Two broad categories describe these – complete and incomplete spinal cord injuries. Complete refers to losing all abilities below the injury site, while those with incomplete retain some neuromuscular function below this point.

• Quadriplegia (or tetraplegia) occurs following injury to your cervical spine, causing paralysis in arms, legs and trunk.

• Paraplegia results due to damage lower down on your spinal column affecting both legs and possibly also trunk control.

• Other serious complications involve lost or altered sensation/temperature regulation round-the-clock assistance requirement due deficit in motor skills

It’s important not just knowing what type you’re dealing with but how they were caused as well because often times determining liability comes down solely upon details like these regardless whether result was accident or negligence someone else involved event leading up incident.

One unarguable fact about experiencing a major traumatic event such as a spinal cord injury- It incurs significant costs! Medical bills pile up rapidly – adding financial stress to an already stressful situation. Typically, victims must contend with expenses related to hospital stays, surgeries, physical therapy sessions; specialized adaptive equipment might be required like wheelchairs or ventilators.

Moreover, if you’re unable to work due to the injury, lost income can create additional financial difficulties. Mental health issues like depression and anxiety can also arise as an indirect result of these injuries. You might need psychological counseling or psychiatric medications that add up costs too.

With such a devastating injury, you should never be burdened with the stress of battling insurance companies alone. Dealing with insurance adjusters who have been trained to minimize claim values further adds insult to already inflicted injuries.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in fighting for those who are facing these unimaginable circumstances because we understand how important it is for victims and their families to get fair compensation in order to ensure they thrive post such setbacks. We bring expert strategies; unique insight into this niche field- making sure our clients receive optimal recovery options available under law while taking away added frozen mental anguish from having navigate complex legalities on own during already traumatic phase life’s journey

Remember: compensations aren’t merely about reimbursement of medical expenses; awarding pain and suffering costs also form equivalently critical battle fronts when it comes down obtaining justice spinal cord injury survivors looking forward rightfully deserved brighter tomorrows

Looking into each case’s individuality thoroughly allows us establish sound arguments best presentation front court jury bench because every client deserves their day heard before judge refuting opponents thereby enhancing possibility winning meritorious lawsuits matter how tough fight may seem outset no aspect small insignificant ignored while marinating laser focus biggest victories even midst smallest battles fought courageously

We encourage you not just hope for best expect it! Don’t hesitate find out more by clicking button below see what your case could potentially worth- You’ve Nothing Lose But Possibly So Much Gain Berrier Carlson Assuredly Butterfly That Stings Like Bee”.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carmi Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Carmi

Areas of Practice in Carmi

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying adept legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal advice for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Fall Occurrences

Professional in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Accident

Ensuring professional legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in extending specialized legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Focused on advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​