...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Caseyville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury, swift legal action is critical. Carlson Bier understands this urgency with decades of dedicated experience in such cases within Illinois. A dog owner’s negligence can result in physical and emotional trauma for victims – an area our team specializes in addressing. We work tirelessly to secure fair compensation while providing compassionate guidance through this difficult journey. Our prowess extends to pleading your case effectively, backed by a deep knowledge in Illinois State laws governing personal injuries due to dog attacks.The efficiency of Carlson Bier has been recognized repeatedly by satisfied clients who consider us their trusted ally during these episodes.Therefore, if you or a loved one have fallen victim to a canine assault incident – contact the renowned attorneys at Carlson Bier without delay.Our law firm places relentless commitment and professionalism at the forefront resulting in successful injury claims,and closure simultaneously,to as many wounded parties as possible.Be rest assured that we are adept at handling all kinds of Dog Bite Injuries’ legalities meticulously and proficiently across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Caseyville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our unwavering dedication is to individuals who have suffered harm due to the negligent actions of others. As Illinois based personal injury attorneys, one area we highly specialize in is Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical and emotional damage. Efficient medical intervention usually prevents life-threatening situations after a dog attack, but it’s not uncommon for victims to require long-term treatment or rehabilitation. They may also experience psychological trauma requiring therapy or counseling interventions.

In Illinois, there’s a specific statute that governs the liability of dog owners for injuries caused by their pets – The Animal Control Act. This law holds dog owners strictly liable if their dog attacks someone without provocation and this person sustains an injury as a result. Dog owners are legally responsible for ensuring their pets do not cause harm to people or property.

There are some key points about Illinois’ Dog Bite Law that you should be aware of:

• There is no ‘one bite rule’ – You could claim compensation even if it’s the first time the dog bit.

• Owners can’t evade liability by claiming they were unaware of their dog’s aggressive nature.

• Victims don’t need to prove negligence on part of the owner.

• If bitten while trespassing or provoking the pet, you cannot make a claim.

Understanding your rights and potential remedies under Illinois laws can seem complex at times; therefore, consulting with knowledgeable personal injury lawyers like us at Carlson Bier can provide sound advice and enable you to navigate these complexities proficiently.

A crucial factor that will play into your case is establishing damages caused by the incident. A lawsuit related to a dog bite might seek various types of damages such as medical expenses (including future costs if ongoing treatment/rehabilitation is required), lost income (present & future), pain & suffering, disfigurement permanent disability among other claims depending on the circumstances at hand. Remember, each case will be unique, incorporating different factors contributing to the individual scenario.

Moreover, being diligent with evidence gathering is imperative. This might include the identity of the dog and its owner, photographs of your wounds and any torn or bloody clothing, witness information, medical records if sought for treatment and any record that helps establish provocation did not occur.

At Carlson Bier, we have a strategic approach that combines thorough knowledge of relevant laws with astute investigation capabilities to secure fair and full compensation for our clients. We deliver uncompromising dedication to each case we undertake – ensuring our clients’ interests are front-and-center in all negotiations or litigation pursued on their behalf.

Living through a dog bite incident can be traumatic – physically, emotionally and financially overwhelming. Yet it’s crucial to recognize that legal recourse exists under Illinois law; you have rights as a victim.

If you think we’re what you need during this challenging time, take that first step towards alleviating your stress by getting an assessment about potential damages you might be entitled to receive. Remember – the weight of mounting medical bills and lost income should not fall upon your shoulders but be borne by those legally responsible for the attack.

It’s often said that ‘knowledge is power.’ Let us at Carlson Bier provide clarity amidst confusion – share insight into these laws’ intricacies while advising how best they apply in your situation – let us stand beside you throughout.

We invite you now to take action – click on the button below to find out how much your case might potentially be worth! At Carlson Bier, rest assured you won’t merely become another statistic; instead, join countless others who’ve experienced firsthand why we’ve earned our reputation as relentless advocates for justice!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Caseyville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Caseyville

Areas of Practice in Caseyville

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving specialist legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Tumble Mishaps

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain just recompense for harms and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending specialist legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in extending expert legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer