FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Caseyville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one been the victim of a pedestrian accident? Carlson Bier is uniquely qualified to handle such cases, providing diligent representation for victims in Caseyville and throughout Illinois. Our reputation for success has come from years of protecting the rights of injured pedestrians by aggressively fighting against negligent drivers and insurance companies. We understand complexities associated with pedestrian accidents making us equipped to help get justice in every scenario; whether it involves crosswalk violations, distracted driving or otherwise. At Carlson Bier, our commitment isn’t just winning your case but rebuilding your life after such a devastating event. Clients choose us because we combine legal expertise with compassion – offering personalized strategies tailored around their specific needs as they navigate through recovery and litigation process simultaneously. Backed by unmatched resources and experience evident from numerous victories throughout the state, we stand ready to deliver positive outcomes linearly aligned with clients’ expectations. For trustworthy representation that prioritizes your best interests following a pedestrian accident — think Carlson Bier- where dedication meets determination.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Caseyville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are the personal injury attorneys you can trust when life turns upside down due to a sudden pedestrian accident. As no two cases are alike, it’s crucial to adeptly recognize and understand every intricate aspect of your case. Our Illinois-based firm specializes in standing up for victims who have been wrongfully injured. Personal injuries, specifically pedestrian accidents, can occur unexpectedly and cause severe consequences, both physically and financially.

Pedestrian accidents are typically caused by the negligence or irresponsibility of vehicle operators on the road. Factors such as distracted driving while texting or talking on the phone, disregarding traffic signs and signals, speeding or reckless driving often contribute to pedestrian-related incidents.

Recognizing these causes helps us create robust legal strategies that aim towards obtaining justice and compensation for our clients.

Dealing with pedestrian accidents requires thoughtful navigation through numerous legal realms in order to successfully deliver justice. These procedures include collecting evidence meticulously at the scene, witness testimonies if available, thorough medical examinations detailing severity of injury and required treatment- all these components join togetherin forming a solid foundation for your claim. One key reason to hire experienced personal injury attorneys like our team at Carlson Bier is knowledgeability – understanding complex laws surrounding pedestrian accidents implies securing an advocate who will strive relentlessly to protect your rights.

Injuries associated with pedestrian accidents range from minor scrapes to serious bodily harm. Seeking immediate medical attention following an accident isn’t just vital for health reasons but also instrumental in defining a substantial part of your personal injury claim.

• Head Injuries: Trauma caused by impact could lead to concussions or brain damage.

• Fractures & Broken Bones: The speed and weight of vehicles often result in broken or fractured bones upon collision with pedestrians.

• Spinal Cord Injuries: Depending on intensity of impact,enabling mobility may be affected resulting in paraplegia or quadriplegia.

The aftermath is not limited solely physical injury, psychological trauma often accompanies such events and must be treated just as diligently.

Above all else, the main aim at Carlson Bier is to ensure you’re compensated fairly for your losses. These compensation brackets include medical expenses past and future, pain suffering inflicted by accident, lost wages due to inability to work during recovery process or permanent disability if injuries prevent you from returning to work altogether.

At this juncture, victims might ask themselves if proceeding without legal representation would simplify matters. While it may seem straightforward initially, undertaking a personal injury claim singlehandedly can be daunting. Insurance companies will likely present reduced settlement offers unlikely covering full extent of incurred damages. They are not on your side but we are.

Our team at Carlson Bier stands arm in arm with you through every step of the complex legal process. Our firm’s top-tier attorneys are driven by an unwavering commitment towards ensuring our clients’ rights aren’t invalidated and their well-being protected.

By allowing us represent your case- simultaneously relieving burden of assembling evidence while facing resistance – we dedicate unrivaled expertise in matching aggressive negotiation tactics insurance companies employ so that you get compensation rightfully yours.

In conclusion, pedestrian accidents can turn lives upside down within seconds creating whirlwinds of physical anguish and financial stress. At Carlson Bier our promise isn’t just professional advice but empathetic support tailored towards easing these distressing times.

So why wait? Let’s find out what your case is worth together! Click on the button below for immediate assistance – a fair fight begins here at Carlson Bier law firm: where justice prevails one case at a time

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Caseyville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Caseyville

Areas of Practice in Caseyville

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing expert legal advice for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Offering professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Mishaps: Focused on helping patients of car accidents receive equitable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Providing experienced legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on extending specialized legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​