...

Bicycle Accidents in Central City

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When confronted with the unforeseen misfortune of a bicycle accident in Central City, rest assured that exceptional legal representation is readily available from Carlson Bier – a leading personal injury law firm distinguished by an outstanding record defending bicycle accident victims. Specializing exclusively in this challenging field has honed our skills to expertly navigate the complexities associated with these cases. We consistently exhibit vigorous advocacy for fair compensation and have repeatedly demonstrated our aptitude to successfully face even giants in insurance. Yes, securing your interests and ensuring maximum restitution is why many regard Carlson Bier as their top choice when seeking a Bicycle Accidents lawyer; bear testimony to unparalleled focus coupled with deep understanding of Illinois laws relating specifically to such distressing incidents. Stand strident knowing you possess professional adept legal support relentlessly pursuing justice on your behalf while you devote yourself entirely towards recovery – precisely what appointment of competent representation should afford. Consider teaming up with us at Carlson Bier for comprehensive counsel revolving around Bicycle Accidents – Reason enough why we hold firm roots within elite echelons of personal injury lawyers everywhere.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Central City Illinois

Bicycle accidents can have a devastating impact, resulting in severe injuries that are not only personally traumatic but also financially draining. When you face such incidents, going it alone is often overwhelming; hence the importance of having a law firm like Carlson Bier by your side to guide you on legal recourse paths. Our Illinois-based lawyer group specializes in personal injury litigations and is steeped heavily in resolving bicycle accident cases.

A significant part of addressing bicycle accidents lies in understanding the common causes that lead up to them – critical information that helps direct the focus of your claim. Some typical factors include vehicle drivers’ negligence or distraction, defective cycling products, poorly maintained roadways, and adverse weather conditions leading to visibility issues. In many instances, other cyclists or pedestrians could contribute to an accident due to irresponsible behavior.

Analyzing these cause factors can help determine who should be held responsible for the damage caused – this might be another cyclist, a driver of a motor vehicle, pedestrians, public authorities responsible for maintaining roads or manufacturers of defective bicycle parts. Understanding accountability in such scenarios is vital as it directly impacts compensation claims.

One key area where we excel at Carlson Bier is our comprehensive approach towards determining liability. We meticulously pore over each facet contributing to the accident- witnesses’ statements, video footage (if available), police reports. Together with our extensive knowledge about local laws and regulations governing transportation and traffic rules for cyclists around Illinois area – we strengthen your claim case.

We then proceed to assess damages linked explicitly to these accidents—medical bills from treating physical injuries become an essential component—the cost incurred for repairing any structural damage inflicted on bikes vie equal attention too. However beyond just these tangible costs lie intangible ones: ranging from emotional distress suffered because of incident related trauma deliberately causing harm versus inadvertent actions bringing about injury- Dickinson v Perry case basis forms here crucial reference point.

Also noteworthy is potential lost income if sustained injuries prevent victims from resuming employment. We work with medical professionals and economic experts to estimate these losses accurately, thereby making a compelling case for deserving compensation.

Those availing services of Carlson Bier can expect customized strategies developed specifically suiting specific incident related circumstances: our primary objective always remains maximizing clients’ financial recovery. Key among these include gathering detailed incident evidence, finding reliable witnesses corroborating your version, negotiating effectively within insurance companies or corresponding defendants. Even in instances when unavoidable- leading full pledged court battles on behalf ensuring justice gets served.

We at Carlson Bier understand how arduous the legal process surrounding bicycle accidents can be—mounting medical bills and unavailability to return to work only compound this stress. But rest assured, as your trusted personal injury attorneys, we handle all aspects of your claim so you can focus solely on your recovery.

What truly sets us apart though is our incessant strive towards staying updated about ongoing modifications made in local laws/ policies regarding cycle ethics & safety regulations; ensuring maximum possible advantage clients avail through their well-grounded compensation claims.

You’ve read now what makes Carlson Bier distinctive as a group specializing in litigations surrounding bicycle accidents within Illinois state limits – knowledgeable, experienced and committed firmly towards achieving client success exclusively through ethical means? As next step towards understanding what potential worth one’s unique case holds up against existing legislation clauses- invite clicking below button allowing ourselves contact you at earliest. Since every case is unique, isn’t it time you found out what yours might merit?

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Central City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Central City

Areas of Practice in Central City

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering expert legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal guidance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Tumble Accidents

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents get just recompense for hurts and losses.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Collision

Ensuring experienced legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to extending expert legal representation for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Harm

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer