...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cicero

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the unfortunate consequence of a dog bite injury, it’s critical to secure legal representation that understands your needs. Carlson Bier employs seasoned personal injury attorneys who specialize in this complex field. Our expert team is committed to defending dog bite victims in Cicero and ensuring they receive full compensation for distress or damage incurred. While navigating the laws of Illinois can be daunting, our resourceful lawyers ensure your rights are upheld diligently and assertively against contractors’ insurance companies, homeowners, landlords or anyone else responsible for the incident. Trust Carlson Bier; we provide clear advocacy through aggressive court representation coupled with compassionate advice each step of the way. Whether you require assistance understanding insurance contracts or need guidance throughout arduous court proceedings after a canine attack–we’re here to help turn things around swiftly and efficiently while maintaining respect for our client’s circumstance all along! Partnering with us ensures you’re not alone after such trying times—Carlson Bier: We’re on your side when it matters most!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cicero Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact of dog bite injuries can not only take a toll physically but also emotionally. Our personal injury attorneys specialize in aiding victims of such unfortunate incidents, striving for rightful compensation for our clients while they focus on their recovery. Based in Illinois, our firm carries years of experience under its belt and is deeply rooted into providing first-rate assistance to our communities.

Even though dogs are known as man’s best friends, instances may occur where they inflict harm. Dog bites often lead to severe infections, permanent nerve damage or scarring and mental trauma which can result in hefty medical bills and lost wages due to incapacitation. If you’ve been bitten by someone else’s pet, these costs should not be your burden to bear alone.

As per Illinois law:

• Owners are liable if their pet harms another person without provocation.

• Victims do not have to prove that the attacking animal has a history of violence.

• You do not require any evidence that the owner had knowledge about the violent nature of their pet.

This strict liability statute aids victims greatly, making cases more straightforward by eliminating the need for establishing negligence on part of the pet owner. Furthermore worth noting is that comparative negligence does help reduce overall compensation if victim action led to provoked aggression from the animal – this highlights how essential factors like circumstances surrounding an incident may affect claims outcome.

It’s crucial then to gather as much information at earliest opportunity post-incident: photographs of wounds prior treatment applied, pictures showing location it took place especially emphasizing conditions leading up till event occurrence; contact details witnessed persons; reports timely filed with local authorities – every witnessing document builds stronger groundwork towards claim validation.

Trust Carlson Bier’s experienced team when facing complexities associated with dog bite claims – we ensure maximum compensation fought vigorously by using existing laws aptly. Hiring us means leveraging dog bite injury law experts’ proficiency over decades winning favorably against insurance companies’ stringent pursuits safeguarding own interests. Our approach includes thorough investigation towards compiling concrete evidence alongside experienced medical expert testimonials after undertaking a comprehensive injury-exposure assessment, both help in smart claim negotiation ensuring your current and future requirements are fully covered.

Here at Carlson Bier, we believe in more than just legal representation. We advocate for you throughout the tumultuous journey—providing support, advice, and compassion when needed the most—you’re never alone. While dog bite laws may seem straightforward on paper but can quickly become complicated due to myriad intricate clauses; our personal injury attorneys work tirelessly unraveling complex narratives into simple understandable occurrences while safeguarding client rights relentlessly.

Not only do we represent clients within city limits but extend services all across Illinois however let it be known that there is no physical office located in Cicero which law mandates clarification against misconceptions possibly insinuating so indirectly elsewise – every claim gets thoroughly examined with dedicated commitment equally regardless location discrepancy.

On choosing Carlson Bier for paternizing justice pursuit, not only will receive exemplary professional service backed by successful track records spanning across numerous intricately-woven case dossier engagements defying normative complexities but assured dedicated personalized handling unique to individualistic background premise underlying those white noise distortions awaiting unclouded justice verdict hopeful deliverance.

Legal problems often come uninvited causing distress and anxiety thus don’t wrestle singlehandedly—Contact our firm today. Ready now to fight for your right? Find out what could be potentially awarded by clicking below! Let’s together reclaim peace rightfully restoring deserved life dignity – because everyone deserves fair shot at Justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cicero Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cicero

Areas of Practice in Cicero

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering skilled legal help for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Providing expert legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal services to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Tumble Incidents

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering professional legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Construction Incidents

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to delivering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Harm

Committed to advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer