...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Cicero

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the complex realm of Medical Malpractice law, Carlson Bier distinguishes itself with unparalleled prowess. A premier personal injury lawyer firm that represents clients across Illinois communities such as Cicero, their name embodies a legacy of justice and empathy in medical negligence cases. Your health is invaluable; hence it matters most that your legal advisor navigates this challenging arena with sensitivity and progressive acumen. Each case at Carlson Bier undergoes rigorous scrutiny by seasoned attorneys to construct a robust argument focused on securing fair compensation for your losses. Given our track record, you can expect partnered support throughout every step towards resolution while maintaining utmost transparency about proceedings. Accustomed to intricate healthcare laws in Illinois – from surgical errors to nursing home neglects – we bring expertise honed through persistent advocacy over numerous trials and negotiations involving medical malpractice concerns. Engaging Carlson Bier means standing resiliently before adversity – because giving voices to damaged lives demands more than law; it calls for heart-filled dedication.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Cicero Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a keen focus on medical malpractice cases. As a trusted legal entity throughout Illinois, our team is composed of highly skilled personal injury attorneys committed to pursuing justice for those adversely affected by the negligent actions of healthcare providers. Serving you with diligence, compassion and intelligence, our continued goal is to help victims secure fair compensation while ensuring that similar incidents don’t recur.

Medical malpractice entails any action or lack thereof by medical personnel that deviates from accepted standards of practice in the medical community leading to patient injury or death. This can consist of errors in diagnosis, treatment application, health management techniques, medication prescriptions and aftercare instructions. Medical practitioners have an obligation to adhere strictly to professional standards and any deviation causing harm forms grounds for filing a medical malpractice lawsuit.

• Healthcare professionals are required to offer standard care – The benchmark for measuring if negligence occurred relates back to standard practices which competent doctors would undertake under like circumstances.

• Connection between negligence and injury – For a case to qualify as medical malpractice it must be convincingly demonstrated that the practitioner’s breach directly caused the damage or exacerbated an existing condition

• Demonstrable damages- Unless the patient can prove that they suffered tangible physical or emotional damage due to negligence no case exists.

At Carlson Bier, we understand these requirements all too well and strategically mount cases with compelling evidence while passionately pushing for just outcomes. Our proven track record boasts decades-long experience pin-pointing subtleties often missed out during investigations; yielding victories even in challenging situations.

Perhaps you suspect you’re a victim but aren’t certain your circumstance constitutes actionable malpractice? We’ve observed diverse scenarios ranging from surgical errors where foreign objects were left inside bodies after operations; misdiagnosis leading delayed treatment worsening pre-existing conditions; prescription mistakes resulting from administering wrong drugs or dosage levels amongst many others.

It’s crucial not dawdle contemplating on next steps because time is of essence. In Illinois, the Statute of Limitations for initiating medical malpractice lawsuits runs two years from when the claimant first realized or should have discovered they were victims tortious conduct however no cases can proceed beyond four years after actual occurrence date. Small children are given extended timelines that sometimes run until they reach age 22 but limitations still exist so prompt action is advisable.

Engaging Carlson Bier ensures you’ll benefit from our cumulative knowledge reservoir plus skill-available throughout your legal journey as we undertake heavy lifting by: gathering pertinent documentation; arranging expert testimonials; conducting negotiations while readying for court proceedings if necessary.

Our commitment to personal accident victims transcends borders – we’ve successfully worked on numerous medical malpractice lawsuits around Illinois offering unparalleled representation marked by sympathy, tenacity and above all unwavering professionalism. So if you believe you’ve suffered due to healthcare worker negligence don’t hesitate contacting us today because not only do we understand what you’re going through – it’s our everyday mission helping victims like yourself navigate this complex legal terrain while seeking just compensation.

Technology now allows us offer remote services where need be thus proximity cannot divest anyone from enjoying our quality services though we strictly adhere regulation provisions barring false implication that a non-physical office exists in any particular area within Illinois such as Cicero

Shouldn’t you find out what options are available in pursuing your rights? It’s imperative having competent counsel’s guiding hand mitigate anxiety associate with these often-tricky procedures besides ensuring fair restitution gets achieved whenever possible. Click the button below now to get an estimate of what your case could potentially be worth. We’re eager waiting to listen empathetically before charting best course corresponding with your unique circumstances.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cicero Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Cicero

Areas of Practice in Cicero

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing specialist legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing professional legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on helping clients of car accidents obtain appropriate settlement for damages and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Truck Accident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Expert in extending compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Specializing in supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer