Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Cicero

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When experiencing the misfortune of a slip and fall accident in Cicero, consider choosing the Carlson Bier Attorney Group. As personal injury specialists, our team is committed to advocating for justice on behalf of victims of slip and fall accidents. Our intimate understanding of Illinois law behind these incidents ensures we’re equipped with the knowledge needed to secure fair compensation for your injuries. Slip and fall accidents can bring about debilitating consequences both physically and financially; at Carlson Bier, our dedicated lawyers will tirelessly work towards reclaiming compensation suitable to your circumstance’s severity. We understand that every case presents unique challenges—we meticulously analyze each detail aligning it with pertinent legal principles conducive to achieving favorable outcomes. Trust in Carlson Bier’s profound commitment—our substantial experience handling myriad personal injury cases throughout Illinois evidences our unmatched competence within this sector. Don’t feel alone during such distressing times, let us shoulder your burden while laying out strategic solutions customized for you—Carlson Bier is here as steadfast advocates amid challenging circumstances.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Cicero Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the crippling effects of a slip and fall accident. Being a premier personal injury attorney group in Illinois, our legal expertise is rooted in providing dynamic support to victims of various accidents, including slip and falls. Our team of highly seasoned lawyers understands that such incidents are not just mere accidents but events that can significantly alter lives- physically, emotionally, and financially.

Slip and fall accidents may sound trivial by their name, but these unfortunate events lead to serious injuries affecting the spine, hip fractures or even causing life-altering brain injuries among other damages. The aftermath involves not only physical damage but also financial burdens from accumulating hospital bills and loss of income due to inability to continue work.

• Importance of swift legal action: It’s pivotal for you as a victim to engage an experienced lawyer immediately following a slip and fall accident. This serves two purposes—preservation of evidence (which might get wiped off with time), ensuring your rights don’t diminish over time according legislation applicable in Illinois.

• Knowledge about what qualifies as Negligence: Crucial in any personal injury case is establishing negligence on part of premises’ owner. You must be able to prove four things- Existence of duty on part of proprietor; Violation of this duty; If the violation caused direct harm; Quantifying this harm or injury.

In our years at Carlson Bier law firm we’ve witnessed how important taking quick action proves crucial after being involved slip and drive accident – getting us onboard right moment extremely beneficial evidentiary needs helping identify potential liable parties attempt dilute responsibility swift chalk case best manner possible.

Equipped with years-long experience representing victims like yourself in courtrooms across Illinois, we are prepared strategically argue your case jury exploring all avenues secure positive outcome for prosecution corporate establishments successfully win fair settlements insurance companies commercial conglomerates they adequately compensate endured suffering medical expenses future rehabilitation costs wage losses.

As pronounced advocates valuing human recovery and securing financial compensation necessary for this journey, our legal representation process is strategic and empathetic at the same time. Time sensitivity is key in such cases and we are committed to ensuring timely justice befitting your unique circumstances.

• Burden of Proof: In slip-and-fall cases, the survivor carries the burden of proof. This means that they have to convince the jury it’s more probable than not their allegations against the defendant are true.

Moreover, we understand that navigating through a personal injury case can seem overwhelming for someone who has just suffered physical injury. Pain coupled with confusion could potentially make you settle for less than what you deserve. Our role as your legal counsel would be to guide you through these complexities by revealing applicable laws in Illinois pertaining to slip-and-fall incidents while fighting fiercely on your behalf.

The team at Carlson Bier leaves no stone unturned when it comes to gathering facts about your unfortunate incidence—detailed accident reports, camera footage if available or eyewitness statements – all form an indispensable part of our meticulous fact-finding method.

So, don’t let uncertainties or fears stop you from seeking rightful justice. Secure a tried-and-true partner like us during this challenging journey which understandably can be taxing both mentally and physically on any victim trying to recover from a traumatic ordeal.

And now, taking control of your life post such an accident begins with simply clicking on the button below. Find out how much your case would potentially bring in terms of settlement amount under legal provisions prevalent throughout Illinois state laws currently guiding slip and fall accidents – it might pleasantly surprise you!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cicero Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Cicero

Areas of Practice in Cicero

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving professional legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending professional legal help to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Trip Occurrences

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate recompense for damages and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring adept legal representation for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for losses.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Focused on ensuring specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on representing individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer