Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Cicero

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

With a trusted reputation and impressive record in Illinois, Carlson Bier is the premier law firm for representation in Spinal Cord Injuries cases. Whether you’re contending with the aftermath of an accident or navigating the complexities of medical negligence, our expert attorneys are dedicated to championing your rights effectively and judiciously. Our success stems not only from skill but also deep understanding; we grasp how profoundly lives can be impacted by spinal cord injuries. At Carlson Bier, it’s our mission to ensure those affected receive full compensation for their pain and loss. Expertly utilizing all aspects of personal injury laws, we tirelessly work towards securing the justice that each client rightfully deserves. We value absolute transparency as much as determination: this means no hidden costs or surprises — just tireless advocacy committed purely towards fighting on your behalf While there may be many attorneys offering services across Cicero area, it’s essential to place trust where expertise evidences itself most commendably– at Carlson Bier; advocating relentlessly for Spinal Cord Injury victims in Illinois with honesty and tenacity.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Cicero Illinois

As a team of astute attorneys, invested in empowering you during life’s most daunting moments, Carlson Bier provides exceptional legal aptitude and care for victims of spinal cord injuries. Based in the heart of Illinois, our robust team forms its solid reputation on an unwavering commitment to uphold your rights amidst adversity. Spinal cord injury is a severe condition that demands unrivaled medical expertise and meticulous legal acumen – two elements we seamlessly integrate into our practice.

Spinal cord injuries predominantly encompass harm to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal—a critical conduit between the brain and body. This devastating injury can disrupt virtually every physical function, disturbing sensation and mobility. Depending on its severity – whether complete or incomplete—the authorization also targets your emotional well-being and lifestyle circumstances.

• A complete injury entails losing all sensory feeling and ability to promote motor function below the level of injury.

• Contrarily, even with some damages still intact in an incomplete injury, there is partial functioning below the primary level of injury.

The aftermath of such damage inevitably protrudes beyond the confines of physical pain; it extends towards overwhelming medical expenses, constraining treatment protocols, rehabilitative therapies as well as potential income loss. Here at Carlson Bier, our primary aim consists not just in representing you legally but ensuring we secure viable compensation to alleviate these financial burdens substantially.

Few comprehend this arduous journey better than us as personal injury lawyers who have cultivated profound empathy through extensive clinical research collaboration with local hospitals to scrutinize both subtle nuances and broader aspects related to spinal cord injuries. It stands crucial for you to understand how important time is when dealing with this dire situation—proactive legal action can authoritatively impact your claim’s outcome.

Some pivotal pieces of understanding include;

• Early Legal Intervention: Engaging professional legal counsel shortly after a spinal cord-related incident promotes suitable planning which reinforces prospects for procuring optimal compensation.

• Documenting Medical Expenses: Fervent attention towards this vital step establishes a reliable record of your medical costs and, by extension, the credibility of your claim.

• Legal Deadlines: Illinois law stipulates precise deadlines for filing personal injury claims that we help you adhere to, safeguarding judicial recognition of your case.

Selecting Carlson Bier as your trusted partner engenders trust akin to entrusting family. We ably walk alongside you every step of the way—inform, guide, protect – fortify. Though transparent consultation and empathetic interaction is at our core values’ heart, so is steadfastness. We remain resolute in confronting any challenge that threatens fair restitution for your plight.

Spinal cord injuries paint grim portraits eclipsed with pain and uncertainty; however, rest assured solid legal representation from Carlson Bier illuminates avenues towards hope and restitution. Our fountainhead mission remains grounded in compassion yet stimulated by professionalism striving both for justice on behalf—and above all—the well-being of injured clients.

While accurate prognosis can seem ambiguous initially due to spinal cord injury’s multifaceted nature, what is not uncertain or vague is the unwavering commitment our expert lawyers will invest toward achieving deserved compensation. Recovering damages helps mitigate burdensome medical bills, lost wages arising from downtime spent rehabilitating—facilitating a definitively smoother transition journey post-tragedy.

Remember that while Carlson Bier actively aids victims across Illinois expanses—we hold no presence beyond those locales where we nurture physical offices. Meaning though our outreach spans extensively—it would be inaccurate and against Illinois regulations to assert Carlson Bier as ‘personal lawyers located in Cicero’, for instance—we lack a physical office there—an important distinction cemented within our compliance policy.

Wrestling silently against spinal cord injuries denotes an unfair match—one we adamantly want to tip scales favorably in honor of victims navigating these murky waters. Fight isn’t something you should have alone; align with Carlson Bier—leave your worries at our doorstep. We invite you to perpetually challenge your adversities. Click on the button below, gauge the value of your case now, and together let’s carve a superior sense of your tomorrow. You don’t bear this burden alone—we commit by standing firm alongside you: today, tomorrow—always.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cicero Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Cicero

Areas of Practice in Cicero

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying expert legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing professional legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal support to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate payout for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending adept legal assistance for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in providing dedicated legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to defending clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer