...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Clayton

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a Clayton resident who has recently suffered injuries from a bicycle accident, Carlson Bier is your most reliable advocate. Our team of accomplished attorneys boasts in-depth knowledge and extensive experience in handling personal injury cases related to bicycle accidents. We understand the intricacy of Illinois laws, ensuring that we bring forward robust strategies uniquely tailored for your situation. Moreover, our lawyers provide compassionate legal service built on commitment and transparency. With great emphasis put on achieving justice for you, we function with unmatched dedication to prove liability effectively and negotiate the best possible compensation that fairly reflects your pain, suffering, medical expenses or loss. Trust us at Carlson Bier as we navigate systematically through every technical jargon and complex process so all you have to focus on is getting better while leaving all things law-related in our capable hands.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Clayton Illinois

At the Carlson Bier law firm, we are committed to unveiling the truth and protecting those involved in bicycle accidents. Located right here in Illinois, our team of dedicated professionals works diligently on behalf of victims, representing their rights with integrity and grit.

Bicycle accidents often result in severe injuries or even fatalities due to lack of defensive protection. The nature and implications these incidents carry extend beyond physical wounds; they reach deep into emotional trauma and financial burden. However, applicable laws have been set into place to protect bicyclists’ rights in such instances paving way for injury compensation.

• Every year, thousands of cyclists are injured or killed due to collisions.

• Nearly a third of all bicycle accidents involve an automobile.

• Bicyclist deaths represent approximately 2% of total traffic fatalities annually according to national reports.

• A cyclist hit by a car could be entitled to receive damages for present and future medical costs, property damage, lost wages and pain & suffering.

In light of such statistics and standings within civil law structures, it’s paramount that victims recognize their entitlements when faced with bike-related incidents. At Carlson Bier firm, we strive tirelessly towards asserting these rights providing qualified consultation at every step.

When you employ our services following a bicycle accident in Illinois area, we will provide clear-cut definitions surrounding negligence terms as well as smart legal counsel on insurance claims processes given the complexity grounded within these spheres. Our ultimate focus lies upon securing ample compensations deserved by clients from liable parties ensuring suitable restoration post trauma.

Furthermore;

• We promptly collect evidence pivotal for your case including witness accounts & photographic proof

• Propose equitable settlements backed up by reasoned arguments

• And if necessary prepare aggressively for trial proceedings

Navigating traffic rules alone can prove daunting especially when wrapped up with exciting cycling adventures whether commuting or exercising across beautiful landscapes only natural to Illinois State terrain. Mishaps crop but what truly counts is how handled subsequently – let Carlson Bier bear this burden lightening your load.

Knowing the ins-and-outs of bicycle accidents and Illinois law is what makes our legal team stand out. Our personalized approach ensures that every client receives attention to detail that their case deserves. More importantly, we understand the turmoil a bike accident can cause which truly underlines our fighting spirit in seeking justice for you.

If you or a loved one has suffered a biking accident in Illinois, do not hesitate to reach out to us immediately. Carlson Bier’s personal injury lawyers are ready to evaluate your case and guide you through these trying times with skillful advice and unwavering support.

We draw from extensive experience in representing numerous clients just like yourself combined with an undying passion towards seeing lives mended positively. While we cannot guarantee outcomes (since each case being unique) Carlson Bier Law Firm promises sincerest dedication, unrelenting pursuit for truth, and result-oriented representational strategies enhancing chances towards favorable results.

Now comes the question you’ve been perhaps pondering over – How much is your case worth? Well we believe in transparency coupled up with comprehensive evaluations ensuring no stone goes unturned during calculated analysis. Why don’t we discuss specifics on potential range of damages attainable within framework designed keeping YOUR best interests at heart? Click on the button below right now to find out how much your case could potentially be worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Clayton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Clayton

Areas of Practice in Clayton

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving professional legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Trip Mishaps

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Harms

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents gain reasonable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Collision

Offering adept legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on providing professional legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Focused on advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​