...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cortland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Cortland, turn to Carlson Bier. Experts in personal injury law with an emphasis on addressing dog bite cases, our firm understands the intricate legal aspects specific to this kind of incident—providing reassurance and necessary guidance during these challenging times. Illinois’s nuanced laws permit some exemptions and Carlson Bier is dedicated to investigating every angle for your benefit, ensuring you receive full compensation for physical and emotional pain endured as a result. Our thorough knowledge of Illinois’s legislation has enabled us to be reputable advocates for numerous victims across regions; hence we are confident in safeguarding your rights effectively. Choosing Carlson Bier means selecting experienced attorneys who carry out diligent research related to each individual case—offering personalized legal strategies that foster optimum outcomes. Although agonizing experiences like such can’t be erased, entrusting your distress with Carlson Bier promises fair recovery support through adept advocacy within the framework of our proficiency surrounding dog bite injuries claims processing.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cortland Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law and proudly serve the State of Illinois. One area of this practice that is particularly relevant to many residents is dog bite injuries. Dog bite injuries are not only painful but could also result in emotional trauma and high medical costs. In some unfortunate instances, these attacks can even prove fatal. This underscores the significance of knowledge about dog bite laws as well as having experienced legal representation to ensure victims obtain justice.

The nature of a dog bite injury can range from mild to severe. Mild incidents might involve scratches or small wounds, often attributable to playful nibbling rather than aggressive behavior. However, more serious encounters can lead to significant puncture wounds, torn skin or tissue damage resulting in disfigurement; sometimes requiring reconstructive surgery.

Some key points to remember about Illinois’ statutes concerning dog bites include:

• The owner of the dog is liable for full damages if their animal injures someone without provocation.

• The law applies not only when the incident occurs on public property but also private premises where the victim was legally present.

• No restrictions apply based on breed-specific legislation – all dogs are considered equally capable of inflicting harm under state law.

• Compensation may be pursued for physical pain and suffering, loss of earnings potential due to impaired employability among others aspects.

Many people underestimate how problematic handling a claim can be without proper legal assistance. Insurance companies commonly try downplaying the severity of injuries or even attributing blame onto victims themselves thereby undermining their just entitlements.

It’s essential you trust our team at Carlson Bier with your case because we understand what’s at stake after such a traumatic experience. We have been advocating successfully for clients traumatized by dog bites through both negotiations with responsible parties’ insurers and courtroom litigation if required ensuring you get fair compensation.

Additonally, it’s essential to know that bystanders who witness these events may have claims arising from psychological trauma associated with the incident. Should such an unfortunate occurrence transpire, make sure to consult a professional legal ally in asserting your rights.

In our experience dealing with dog bite cases at Carlson Bier, evidence plays a crucial role in ensuring successful outcomes. Photographs of injuries, medical records outlining treatments and costs incurred, witness testimonials are some the vital components of shedding light on the extent of suffering caused by these attacks. We guide you meticulously through these steps keeping in mind their significance to the final settlement or awards.

Lastly, bear in mind that time is of essence after such occurrences since there exist statutes of limitations as per Illinois law beyond which claims may not be legally admissible.

Carlson Bier maintains a strong commitment towards empowering victims of personal injury incidents with respect to their legal rights. Our firm has built its distinguished reputation on delivering expert advice and dedicated representation.

We invite you to seek free consultation from us about your case – it’s truly important that clients understand thoroughly how we strategize diligently for optimal results while engaging empathetically with their predicament.

Understanding all this can be overwhelming, especially while recovering from physical wounds and emotional distress following a traumatizing ordeal. That’s precisely why we’re here – fostering collaboration that eases this period considerably based upon years of specialized expertise within this spectrum.”

Now armed with some information about this specific domain associated with personal injury law, should you unfortunately find yourself being faced with navigating through aftermaths associated with dog bites whether as direct victims or eyewitnesses- remember Carlson Bier stands ready to handle your claim effectively for just compensations.

We cordially encourage you now… take further proactive step by clicking below to ascertain what monetary remuneration might potentially accompany resolution of your case factoring all nuances discussed earlier’. Entrust us at Carlson Bier for diligent pursuit towards ensuring full restitution acknowledging pain endured due to someone else’s careless pet ownership.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cortland Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cortland

Areas of Practice in Cortland

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying expert legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Occurrences

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents secure fair compensation for hurts and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering expert legal advice for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to extending professional legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​