FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Crainville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a spinal cord injury is undeniably life-altering. With the Carlson Bier attorney group at your side, you can navigate the complexities of pursuing a claim with trusted experience and knowledge of Illinois law. Specializing in personal injury cases, their unparalleled expertise has positioned them as leading advocates for victims of spinal cord injuries. Carlson Bier’s professional dedication resonates in their consistent efforts to fight fiercely for just compensation, ensuring that all medical costs are covered for this unique category of clients. Not being bound by location limits, they take pride even from Crainville in defending victims’ rights with unwavering determination and strategic dexterity while not compromising ethical standards set by Illinois law concerning business locations.

Their distinct focus on Spinal Cord Injuries cases strengthens their ability to comprehend the nuances associated with it – differentiating between complete or incomplete damage while assessing suitable avenues for financial restitution.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier monumentalize your path towards reclaiming normalcy after adversity through justice pursued strategically under Illinois rules – making them an exceptional choice when choosing representation from any end corner of our state from Chicago heights down south linked to its extreme northwest like Crainville…representing quality over geography!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Crainville Illinois

At the distinguished law firm of Carlson Bier, we provide expert personal injury legal services tailored to our esteemed clients. One area that solicits our exceptional skills often involves spinal cord injuries—a critical section of personal injury law—that subsequently necessitates specialized understanding and consideration.

Spinal cord injuries can be life-altering events triggering significant medical expenses, physical impairment, emotional trauma, and drastic lifestyle adjustments. Consequently, it’s crucial to have knowledgeable lawyers like the ones at Carlson Bier by your side who understand this particular territory in personal injury law.

Key aspects that differentiate spinal cord injuries include:

• The enduring nature of these damages extends them beyond usual wounds or fractures

• Their potential to result in paralysis requisites long-term care and rehabilitation

• The complexity of such cases demands high levels of expertise

Despite its dominance within personal injury claims repertoire, spinal injury isn’t a generic term; their variances are manifold with each carrying distinctive implications—complete versus incomplete injuries; paraplegia versus tetraplegia—are all common classifications within this realm. Our team is well-versed with these intricacies thereby guiding victims through seeking appropriate compensation effectively.

Coincidentally, determining liability in spinal cord accidents could be quite complex—for instance, when considering multiple parties at fault—or attributing negligence correctly—is an intricate process where professional legal navigation is essential. At Carlson Bier, we provide just that—our thorough investigation techniques coupled with honed negotiation skills offer irreplaceable value during such procedures.

Furthermore, there’s an extensive array of associated costs linked with spinal cord injuries to contemplate upon while pursuing rightful compensation includes:

• Medical bills – for immediate treatment and ongoing care

• Rehabilitation treatments – physical therapy or occupational therapy for regaining function

• Aid devices – like wheelchairs or home modifications needed for better accessibility

We endeavor not only to secure financial reparation covering past accrued expenditures but also future anticipated costs tangentially linked with such a debilitating injury.

Essential to comprehend is the integral role comprehensive legal representation plays when dealing with Insurance agents. They oftentimes apply their expertise in an attempt to diminish claim value; therefore, your attorney’s competency significantly impacts the eventual benefit received.

It doesn’t matter how or where your spinal cord injury occurred—be it a motor vehicle crash, sporting event mishap, workplace accident, or slip and fall incident—if you’ve had the misfortune of suffering such trauma anywhere in Illinois—you’re entitled to understanding in-depth regarding compensation eligibility within the context of this state’s laws.

Therefore, allow our team at Carlson Bier guide you through these convoluted intricacies ensuring that justice isn’t compromised. Focused squarely on serving your interests effectively and efficiently—we fight for rightful restoration helping our clients make steps towards resuming normalcy wherever possible.

For nearly all individuals navigating through spinal cord injuries consequences—the issue arising most frequently involves potential compensation amount attainable: Where approval isn’t problematic—what would be its realistic estimate?

At Carlson Bier law firm, we understand that even as we divulge expansive guidance concerning spinal cord injuries–there exists individualistic aspects linked uniquely with each case thereby making comprehensive online explanation difficult. Thusly, for personalized answers tailored specifically around your singular situation—we encourage pushing the button below—with no commitments necessary—initiate finding out just what your case might potentially be worth here today! No towering question should wallow unfrequented especially when it concerns such profound tribulations—that’s our conviction at Carlson Bier—and we stand by you steadfastly as vigilant guardians of justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crainville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Crainville

Areas of Practice in Crainville

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering adept legal help for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Providing dedicated legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying skilled legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents receive equitable compensation for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Accident

Delivering experienced legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Collisions

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​