...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Crescent City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re dealing with a dog bite injury in or near Crescent City, it’s crucial to secure legal counsel from attorneys seasoned in this specific area. Carlson Bier is a clear cut choice; a reputable Illinoisan law firm focusing on personal injuries like dog bites. Our lawyers are adept at understanding the intricacies of such incidents, fully aware of how traumatic they can be both physically and emotionally. At Carlson Bier, we take initiative in meticulously investigating every case – evidentiary collections, witness interviews – so as to build an ironclad case for our clients. Through committed representation and aggressive advocacy, we’ve helped numerous victims recover damages that cover medical expenses and emotional distress costs related to their ordeal. With a proven track record in handling personal injury cases resulting from dog bites effectively, the team at Carlson Bier consistently delivers favorable results that resonate well beyond courtrooms – ensuring justice served for all underdogs…literally! When met with canine trouble punctuated by sharp teeth- remember one name: Carlson Bier – Your companion towards recuperation after Ryegrass tragedy.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Crescent City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law extending comprehensive legal support to victims of dog bite injuries. Based firmly in the heartland of Illinois, our proficient legal team deploys state-of-the-art methods and unsurpassed expertise to champion your rights.

Dog bites can incur a variety of physical and emotional injuries that could lead to substantial expenses for medical treatment, psychological therapy, and sometimes loss of wages due to an inability to work. Our exceedingly qualified attorneys have unparalleled experience navigating these cases leading to optimal outcomes for our clients.

Understanding Dog Bite Laws: The state of Illinois follows strict liability laws when it comes to dog bites. This suggests that the owner is held accountable if their pet attacks or causes harm irrespective of whether the animal has been aggressive before or not – assuring you legally sound claims.

Regarding Compensation: A victim of a dog bite incident could be entitled to compensation for various damages:

• Medical Expenses: This includes ambulance costs, hospital bills, medication expenses etc.

• Future Medical Costs: If applicable, this considers future surgeries or long-term care required due to the attack.

• Therapy Charges: Mental health treatments like counseling or therapy are also covered.

• Wage Loss: Earnings lost during recovery from injury are compensable.

• Emotional Distress: Psychological trauma resulting from such incidents often warrants further financial redress.

Liability Issues: Liability is more than just owning the pet; those who exercise control over animals might be considered liable too. There’s also a provocation clause which defends owners if they’re proven that you provoked their pet into attacking, while others still can sue private landlords if they were aware their tenant owned a dangerous pet but didn’t take necessary precautions.

Proving Negligence – In some situations, demonstrating negligence on part of the owner may increase potential compensation amount aside from proving liability under Illinois’ Animal Control Act; yet another layer where our sagacious lawyers can truly make a difference!

Illinois law also has a statute of limitations. You have a specific timeframe, typically two years from the time of injury, to file a lawsuit. This isn’t absolute and could change based on facts like age or mental competency, where our proficient lawyers can guide you meticulously.

We understand that pursuing legal recourse often induces stress and uncertainty. At Carlson Bier, we value compassionate client engagement as much as relentless litigation for your rights. Ethical service transparency combined with an unrelenting dedication to secure just outcome underpins our reputation up-and-down the state of Illinois.

To make the journey smoother for you, Carlson Bier operates on contingency-fee basis – meaning that we charge only after securing damages/compensation for you. This safeguards your financial interests letting you focus more on recovery than constant legal apprehensions.

Do not let confusion and fear deter you from seeking justice! Liability laws in dog bite cases may seem vexing but do not worry – at Carlson Bier, we are well primed to handle varied facets of these lawsuits leveraging knowledge and experience in Illinois’ unique statutory system.

As difficult as experiencing personal injuries can be; feeling foundering inundation sorting through insurance claims paperwork or determining liability need not viciously compound it! With experienced attorneys who wield comprehensive insights into all myriad elements linked to filing such lawsuits successfully—you’re supported by capable hands at every juncture!

Take the first key step toward compensative relief today! Be it medical bills, wage loss or exorbitant therapy expenses – rest assured: At Carlson Bier, your fight becomes ours too unlocking optimal routes maximizing compensation in tortuous times replete with emotional struggles.

Click on the button below right now—Let’s find out how much YOUR case is worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crescent City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Crescent City

Areas of Practice in Crescent City

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying professional legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering specialist legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Stumble Accidents

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Harms

Providing legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents receive fair payout for damages and harm.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Mishap

Offering specialist legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in providing expert legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Focused on advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​