...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Crescent

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury can be a traumatic event with lasting impacts. In such difficult times, turn to the professional legal services of Carlson Bier. Renown in Illinois for our exceptional skill and specialized knowledge in dealing with dog bite injuries claims, we are committed to pursuing justice for victims nationwide. We understand that each case is unique which calls for an individualized approach tailored to your situation’s specifics. Our seasoned lawyers dig deep into every case, ensuring no stone is left unturned while seeking full compensation from liable parties thus making us particularly effective at securing favorable outcomes including in Crescent city cases. At Carlson Bier notice isn’t just another client; you’re someone who deserves understanding, commitment, and an unwavering pursuit of justice and maximum compensation possible under the law after a devastating incident like a dog bite injury! Trust us to bring our legendary dedication everywhere it’s needed – trust us as your steadfast companion on this journey towards restoring normalcy after trauma – because we firmly believe Justice Served Life Restored.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Crescent Illinois

At Carlson Bier personal injury law firm, our primary commitment is to guide individuals through legal complexities when they face severe scenarios like dog bite injuries. We fully comprehend the unique nature of dog bite cases in Illinois and stand at the pinnacle of representation for clients coping with such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bites can occur unexpectedly and could result in debilitating physical and emotional trauma – injuries that may leave victims with substantial medical expenses, lost wages, severe pain, suffering, or even permanent disabilities. The damage inflicted by a dog can be superficial or penetrate deep into muscles, tendons, nerves or bones causing serious disfigurement or impairment. Here are key things to know about dog bite injuries:

• The severity isn’t always immediately apparent

• Infections/complications may arise later on

• Some psychological implications can persist over time (e.g., PTSD)

Navigating this terrain without skilled professional counsel can be overwhelming; hence our dedicated attorneys provide unwavering support towards achieving reimbursement via litigation tailored explicitly to your predicament.

In Illinois, personal liability applies regarding dog bites under 510 ILCS 5/16 ‘Animal Control Act’. It clearly states that if a dog or another animal attacks an individual without provocation – whether the attack occurs in public places or while lawfully present on private property – then the owner becomes legally liable for civil damages suffered by the victim as a direct consequence of the attack. Our knowledgeable attorneys will help you understand these specific regulations and work diligently to ensure you receive maximum compensation allowed under existing laws.

Due to variances inherent in interpreting legal provisions surrounding pet owners’ responsibilities vis-à-vis their pets’ actions within Illinois jurisdiction, qualified advocacy becomes invaluable. Conducting extensive analysis involving all circumstances leading up to incident discovery ensures pinpoint accuracy compensatory projections initiating from differentiated damages like medical bills/surgical procedures cost recovery juxtaposed against diminished life quality consequent upon egregious encounter experiences incurred therein.

Working across multiple dimensions towards victims’ justice drives our strategic approach – exercise of proactive litigation methods, meticulous procedural attention toward nuanced claim delivery particulars (factual attributions/significant dates/legal requirements); thereby significantly enhancing distinct case elements ahead of determination finality. These applied measures translate directly into aggressive representation targeted towards realizing deserved compensation for dog bite victims.

At Carlson Bier, we are not generic attorneys; we pride ourselves on personalized counsel that thoroughly investigates each incident’s minutiae detail – deeply probing injury severity levels against profound comprehension of Illinois state-specific legislation trifecta – contextualizing ensuing legal adjustments into wide-angled exploratory perspectives delivering robust defense strategies designed to assure rewarding outcomes eventually.

Indeed, empathy is a core value in our practice. We render services with high sensitivity to prevailing circumstances tethered around client suffering while concurrently initiating formidable fight capacity aimed at establishing parties legally culpable through meticulously crafted evidentiary support apparatus deployed deliberately alongside comprehensive argumentation footprints ensuring rightful dues are paid fully to deserving clients.

Simply navigating the language and intricacies of law surrounding such cases can be daunting; coupled with physical recovery demands, this can seem insurmountable. But you are not alone: the experts at Carlson Bier specialize in creating clarity amid chaos allowing resolute focus towards recovery unhindered by peripheral interference which might aggravate trauma effectuation or impede smooth healing periods inherent post dramatic encounters steeped within structuralized retaliatory legal frameworks yielding successful claimant satisfaction potentials across Illinois’s jurisdictional terrain.

As dedicated professionals, we believe providing informed advice forms an essential part of effective representation. Therefore, besides securing favourable outcomes for clients contending with dog bite injuries, we pay close attention to informing them throughout every stage – ultimately leaving them better-educated about proceedings involving personal injury laws in relation to their cases.

We invite you now to take crucial initial steps towards your deserved victory over this unfortunate encounter – follow the link below and find out what your case could potentially be worth. Let Carlson Bier be your trusted partner in this journey to recovery and justice as we work together towards regaining control over your life with due compensation for the harm inflicted so unwittingly upon you. With us, you find lawyers who care – professionals committed impressively beyond case conclusion linearity; consistently pursuing transformative justice textured by deep empathy tenets alongside expansive legal competence margins orchestrated systematically within client challenge envelopes guaranteeing superior outcomes eventually. Together, let’s redraw this challenging storyline into victory narratives celebrating resilience triumphantly scaling restorative heights enroute dog bite injury compensations authorities across Illinois laudably admire today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crescent Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Crescent

Areas of Practice in Crescent

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering adept legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, delivering adept legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Trip Incidents

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents gain equitable payout for wounds and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​