FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Crescent

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When in need of legal representation due to a pedestrian accident, consider the highly skilled team at Carlson Bier. Based in Illinois and well-versed in all aspects of personal injury law, our focus is unwaveringly on supporting victims and their families throughout these challenging times. Our team’s dedication, expertise, and understanding approach make us an excellent choice for those seeking help after a pedestrian-related incident.

We are particularly adept at navigating the intricate laws surrounding pedestrian accidents – protecting your right to fair compensation while alleviating stress during this difficult period. We are committed to securing maximum recovery for medical expenses, lost wages due to inability to work or reduced earning capacity caused by debilitating injuries.

Our unyielding passion for justice supplies us with unparalleled negotiating power when advancing our clients’ interests either through settlement discussions or courtroom litigations where necessary. We understand that every case is unique – hence we tirelessly fight for justice tailored specifically towards each client’s individual situation.

Trust the seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier who have made it their mission to deliver sound, comprehensive legal counsel designed around your needs; experienced champions advocating flawlessly on your behalf following devastating Pedestrian Accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Crescent Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we recognize the serious repercussions that pedestrian accidents can have on victims. As a legal team devoted predominantly to personal injury cases across Illinois, our goal is to advocate for victims and potentially recover significant financial compensation on their behalf. Pedestrian accidents often result in severe bodily injuries due to the sheer force exerted when a vehicle strikes an unprotected individual. These can range from broken bones and lacerations to traumatic brain injuries or even fatalities.

Understanding the factors contributing to pedestrian accidents is crucial in legally addressing them. The most common causes include driver negligence – being distracted behind the wheel or failing to yield right of way at crosswalks, dangerous road conditions like poor lighting or lack of sidewalks, disregard for traffic signals by both drivers and pedestrians, impaired driving under influence of drugs or alcohol among many others.

Victims often bear hefty medical expenses due to hospital bills, rehabilitation costs, temporary or permanent disability needs and psychological trauma treatments stemming from such unfortunate incidents. Moreover, they may also face potential loss of income during recovery period which further aggravates their financial struggle.The monetary strain coupled with physical pain and emotional distress can indeed be overwhelming.

Thus it becomes intensely important that victims understand their rights post a pedestrian accident scenario.While Illinois law explicitly states that pedestrians generally have right-of-way at crosswalks – marked or unmarked – any exceptions in specific situations can affect liability allocation.

• A pedestrian has full right-of-way if he/she started crossing on ‘walk’ signal even if changes midway.

• Even if not in crosswalk but moving parallel / closely parallel to edge of roadway i.e., shoulder; a driver must avoid colliding with him/her.

• In case a traffic-control device is absent at place where path crosses roadway then pedestrians crossing path are accorded right-of-way over vehicles only within one lane distance.

This intricate understanding forms the backbone of crafting strong legal stance towards justifiable compensation claims.However,it’s equally crucial to bear in mind that Illinois operates under a modified version of comparative negligence law. This means, if a person is found partially responsible for the accident, his/her compensation may be reduced proportionally by percentage of assumed fault.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier thoroughly investigates each case, collecting evidences like surveillance footage, eyewitness account and police report among others to decipher causal factors behind the incident. Armed with this potent information we can accurately determine one’s potential claim value; from property damage and medical expenses to loss of consortium plus pain and suffering damages.We map out tailored legal strategies aligning closely with each client’s unique case specifications aiming towards optimal financial recovery.With us,you never have to worry about upfront payment as we adhere to ‘No Win,No Fee’ policy hence you only pay our fees once we win your case.

We strongly believe in power of precise legal education.Thorough comprehension about pedestrian accidents law helps not just victims but everyone else too in enforcing necessary caution while on road.Remember,responsible driving habits coupled with vigilant pedestrian behavior are vital building blocks towards curbing this issue.Our website hosts an extensive range of insightful resources covering various facets around personal injury realm.Check them out!

To further assist you instantaneously,we offer free preliminary consultation where one of our skilled attorneys would evaluate specifics around your case then advise on best course forward.Y ou’re encouraged to click the button below for determining how much your case might potentially be worth without any obligations!Trust us for championing your cause tirelessly until justice prevails.So don’t wait any longer – explore more about pedestrian accidents through our detailed resources or connect directly with us now.Customized assistance awaits you at Carlson Bier-your ideal partner navigating through complexities surrounding personal injury cases across Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crescent Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Crescent

Areas of Practice in Crescent

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering specialist legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Providing expert legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents get just remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring professional legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Damages

Expert in providing compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440