Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Crossville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As a significant personal injury matter, spinal cord injuries require the highest level of expertise. In Crossville and beyond, Carlson Bier has set itself apart in this demanding field. With an unwavering commitment to clients who face such life-changing situations, our firm is dedicated to providing exceptional representation tailored specifically for spinal cord injury cases. Our approach centers on comprehensive understanding, meticulous preparation, and aggressive litigation which have repeatedly resulted in substantial settlement wins or verdicts while ensuring victims’ rights are upheld consistently at every turn.

Seeking justice after this kind of setback can entail considerable complexities that necessitate adept legal support like ours. We stay ahead by constantly enhancing our knowledge about ongoing changes related to these injuries – from updated medical procedures and evolving treatment methodologies to intricate laws governing compensation claims.

When considering legal representation for spinal cord injury-related matters in Illinois including Crossville area although we’d love welcoming you at Carlson Bier’s office space elsewhere throughout the state; rest assured our team stands ready whenever needed as your forceful advocate during such trying times – truly embodying ‘legal defenders,’ leaving no stone unturned towards achieving what’s rightfully deserved.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Crossville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing top-tier legal representation to individuals who have suffered a personal injury, and that includes catastrophic injuries such as spinal cord damages. Located in Illinois with years of experience under our belts, we strive to deliver guidance and support for our clients through these challenging times.

Spinal Cord Injuries can deeply alter your life in an instant, often leaving individuals grappling with significant emotional distress and financial concerns. It’s crucial to understand that Spinal Cord Injuries are unique due to their potentially long-lasting impact on the victim’s life quality. The damage may disrupt communication between the brain and different body parts leading to impaired function below the injury level. This disruption can bring about difficulties including paralysis (paraplegia or quadriplegia), respiratory issues, bladder control issues, chronic pain among others.

• Paralysis refers to a complete or partial loss of muscle functions affecting motor skills and sensation.

• Respiratory issues may arise from weakening of chest abdominal muscles affecting breath control.

• Bladder control problems occur because signals between the brain and bladder are disrupted causing urinary incontinity.

• Chronic pain is experienced by most victims; this type gets worse over time if left untreated.

The medical expenses resulting from Spinal Cord Injuries can be staggering, encompassing initial hospitalization costs, ongoing therapy sessions, required modifications at home for increased accessibility and other needs which may arise day-by-day like assistive devices or hired help for accomplishing daily tasks. Moreover, loss of earning capacity due to inability work or decreased efficiency also plays into long term expenses making it harder for families who lack sufficient financial resources finding it hard just make ends meet while caring someone.

Identifying negligence becomes key here – if another party’s negligence led you suffering these profound challenges then they must held responsible compensate accordingly; that’s where we come play! Our practice focuses defending rights those impacted by such traumatic events using a comprehensive approach draw upon expert medical testimony, accident reconstruction and knowledge of specific injury-related expenses.

Our legal team at Carlson Bier are deeply committed to advocating for your rights and pursuing rightful compensation in cases of Spinal Cord Injuries brought on by negligence. We have gained a deep understanding over the years about intricacies involved when dealing with insurance companies who often aim minimize pay-out amount; instead believe maximizing clients’ recovery is our true purpose! Another core belief across firm emphasizes client education—we want them fully understand their case.

Having represented numerous individuals affected by spinal cord injuries, we fully comprehend how significantly such injuries affect not only the injured but also their families. It’s this same empathy that pushes us to tirelessly advocate for fair treatment and justice for every client that walks through our doors.

In the quest for justice, remember timing is crucial. Illinois State law stipulates a statute of limitations within which personal injury claims can be filed; miss it and you may forever lose the chance to be compensated for your pain and suffering. So don’t delay getting touch us today let’s begin process fighting self or a loved one.

We firmly believe in providing transparent legal representation where you’re kept informed every step along way hence advise scheduling free consultation so we make sure have all facts pertaining case before proceeding any further actions on our part. This will enable ask pertinent questions might get answers would otherwise remain elusive time being aware severity condition its implications quite liberating empowering as well!

Finally, if you’ve been inflicted with a Spinal Cord Injury due to someone else’s neglectful actions, do not accept less than what you rightfully deserve. Don’t attempt navigating this complex legal field alone – let experienced attorneys like ours guide along path towards rightful compensation

To find out much your claim could worth click button below request free case evaluation from seasoned professionals here at Carlson Bier – ensuring voice heard judgements fair balanced any given situation while personally aligning unique services reflect individual needs victims’ family members alike.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crossville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Crossville

Areas of Practice in Crossville

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering expert legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Delivering expert legal assistance for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending adept legal help to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Trip Accidents

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal support for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents receive equitable payout for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing adept legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal representation for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer