FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Crystal Lawns

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to dog bite injuries, you need skilled and experienced representation to ensure your rights are upheld. Carlson Bier is a law firm that stands out for its exemplary practice in this area of personal injury law. Our compassionate yet aggressive approach provides clients with the attention and guidance necessary when dealing with such traumatic experiences. At our core, we understand the distress these situations cause – not only physical pain but emotional suffering too. We are familiar with the ins-and-outs of Illinois animal control laws rather thoroughly to offer effective legal advocacy for individuals who have suffered from dog bite injuries in Crystal Lawns . As lawyers at Carlson Bier, we strive unwaveringly to secure fair compensation on account of medical bills, lost wages, future care costs, and more importantly pain & suffering caused by these incidents. Understandably no one should ever carry this burden alone or feel unsupported amidst personal injury cases; let us be your trusted allies during such trying times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Crystal Lawns Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic and unsettling a dog bite injury can be. Specialized in personal injury law within the state of Illinois, our expert team has an impressive track record of effectively representing those who have suffered injuries caused by someone else’s negligence. Our duty is to inform you about your rights after such incidents and represent you through every step until justice is served.

Living in Illinois where owning dogs as pets is commonplace, it’s essential for everyone to understand the laws that govern dog-bite cases. To help clarify, under Section 16 of Chapter 510 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes (also known as the Animal Control Act), pet owners are held responsible if their animals cause harm to another person without provocation while they were peacefully conducting themselves anywhere they may legally be.

When you suffer a dog bite injury, several key factors need immediate attention:

• Identifying the owner–The process begins with identifying and locating the dog’s owner.

• Details collection – Comprehensive information should include date and time of attack, breed and description of the animal.

• Medical Attention–Whether or not wounds appear severe; it’s crucial to seek professional medical care since injuries can lead to harmful infections or diseases.

• Documentation – Gather all proof associated with your claim like medical bills or photographs of your sustained injuries.

Ascertaining whether homeowners’ insurance covers these depends upon specific policy terms which differ from situation to situation; therefore legal expertise comes in handy when navigating this terrain – a service seamlessly provided by Carlson Bier attorneys.

The aftermath of a dog bite accident involves emotional distress along with physical pain. Thereafter arise financial pressures related to hospital visits, treatment costs, loss of wages during recovery period etc. It becomes imperative during those times that you receive fair monetary compensation which should account for all these hardships endured due to someone else’s negligence.

Majority aren’t aware about intricacies involved with tort claims including statutes limitation distinct to Illinois law and intricacies related with negotiation of insurance settlements. This is why you require the expertise and legal acumen of a law group like Carlson Bier who can provide indispensable representation protecting and promoting your best interests. Having provided reliable guidance to numerous clients through their challenging journey seeking justice for bite injuries, we foster an uncompromised commitment to bring results that matter using every tool at our disposal.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in demystifying complex legal jargons and offering clear, comprehensible advice tailored specifically according to your circumstances. We strive relentlessly towards ensuring that our clients have peace of mind knowing they possess reliable legal representation while simultaneously working towards recovery post such traumatic incidents.

For cases as serious as dog-bite injuries where consequences radiate far beyond physical pain extending into emotional trauma associated financial burden; remember – You are not alone! Connect with us today at Carlson Bier for trustworthy advice from seasoned attorneys well-versed in Illinois personal injury law.

We invite you now to take action: there’s a wealth of information waiting for you if you’re ready to understand more clearly the potential worth or merits of your specific case. Click on the button below – because apart from assistance navigating complicated legalese, what’s most important here is helping YOU secure restitution which rightfully belongs in YOUR name under Illinois state law. Carlson Bier – your dependable partner when justice is required after suffering a biting injury due to someone else’s negligence in Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crystal Lawns Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Crystal Lawns

Areas of Practice in Crystal Lawns

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Providing specialist legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Providing expert legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Fall Occurrences

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to helping patients of car accidents get equitable compensation for wounds and harm.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Incident

Offering experienced legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for harms.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to delivering specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spine Injury

Specializing in representing patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​