...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Damiansville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries, it is crucial to choose a reputable legal team that specializes in this area of law. Carlson Bier has established itself as a leading authority in handling such cases across Illinois, including Damiansville. With a proven track record for securing just compensations for victims of dog bite incidents and unyielding dedication to every client’s rights and entitlements under Illinois state laws, we are the ideal choice when it comes to pursuing justice after experiencing a devastating incident like this. Our knowledgeable attorneys bring unrivaled expertise alongside compassionate representation to navigate these complex litigation processes efficiently on your behalf. Here at Carlson Bier, our extensive proficiency in litigating dog-related personal injury claims ensures that we understand intricacies unique to these situations better than most other firms do – making us an excellent option when looking for significant support following any unfortunate cases involving canine attacks or related accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Damiansville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we deeply understand the emotional and physical trauma that can result from a Dog Bite Injury. As leading personal injury attorneys in Illinois, our commitment is to guide you through your legal journey and provide support at this challenging time. We believe that comprehensive knowledge is invaluable when dealing with a situation like this, so let us take you through some crucial information about Dog Bite Injuries which will help you make an informed decision.

Dog bites often occur unexpectedly and can cause severe injuries including puncture wounds, crushing damage to muscles or bones, cuts or lacerations, infections such as rabies/ tetanus/bacterial, scarring/disfigurement, psychological harm including PTSD/ phobias/anxiety. They may also lead to unjust secondary consequences – medical bills spiraling out of control; missed days of work culminating in lost wages; not to mention the persistent pain and suffering one might endure.

Living under these circumstances raises several critical legal questions: Who is responsible for dog bites? Is there any provision made by law for dog bite victims? What are the components included in my compensation claim? At Carlson Bier we strive to answer each question thoroughly while emphasizing key points:

• Under the Illinois Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/16), if a pet causes an unprovoked attack on someone resulting in an injury, then the owner or keeper of the animal can be held legally liable for damages caused.

• Medical expenses related directly or indirectly to your recovery process are considered in expensed claims.

• Pain and Emotional Suffering caused due to incident or during recovery period could increase the settlement amount significantly.

Potential exclusions may pertain if victim was trespassing on perpetrator’s property intentionally causing harm or inciting pet towards harmful behavior at the time of bite; it’s essential understanding all aspects before filing a lawsuit.

Regrettably, insurance companies oftentimes undervalue claims citing ambiguous reasons leaving victims in an unjust quandary. At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to dealing these nuances effectively. We meticulously review medical records and employ the necessary resources to determine the extent of injuries and how they impact your life as a whole. Our formidable negotiation skills help stand firm against insurance companies preventing them from reducing claims unfairly.

Our professional acumen doesn’t stop there – post-settlement services also prioritized at Carlson Bier ensuring relief from any future burden related to your injury claim long after case is settled, finalizing health-care provider liabilities, etc., making sure that our clients rest easy with their financial compensation firmly secured.

The aftermath of Dog Bite Injury can be daunting to navigate by oneself. In such stressful scenarios, having effective legal representation matters immensely. Allow us at Carlson Bier – specialized Personal Injury Attorneys in Illinois – safeguard your rights and expedite just compensations for you.

To give you access to justice unburdened by excessive financial stress, we offer service on contingency basis: no win = no fees arrangement This reduces risks tremendously avoiding unexpected cost surprises.

Envision an ally who understands your pain, supports during despair providing reassuring guidance through complexities of personal injury law while relentlessly striving towards securing fair compensation for suffered damages – that’s what partnering with Carlson Bier truly means! Your healing process should not be marred by legal or financial worries; let us shoulder these responsibilities allowing you focus on recovery exclusively.

We offer a preliminary consultation free of charge where understanding your specific situation better helps devise an ideal strategy moving forward optimally aligned with your best interests. Evaluate the strength of your potential personal injury claim today without delay – Remember, prompt action could potentially increase chances of obtaining full rightful entitled compensation; don’t miss out due to procedural delays!

Curious about how much your case might be worth? Pursue the prospect further by clicking on the button below this page’s content. Knowledge powers ahead – get empowered now! The team at Carson Bier takes pride in serving you, our valued clients. Navigate your legal journey empowered with us as your guide!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Damiansville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Damiansville

Areas of Practice in Damiansville

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving specialist legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Providing experienced legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Incidents: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents secure appropriate payout for wounds and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Incident

Offering professional legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in offering specialized legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer