FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Deer Creek

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you suffer from dog bite injuries in Deer Creek, your first call must be to Carlson Bier. Renowned for our comprehensive understanding of Illinois’ complex injury laws, we stand out as the go-to resource for victims seeking tailored and competitive legal representation. Our attorneys possess an in-depth knowledge every facet of dog bite incidents, offering unmatched expertise that gives peace-of- mind knowing your case is in capable hands.

We appreciate the physical and emotional trauma that a dog bite can cause – something easily overlooked by other legal representatives who are unfamiliar with such cases on a day-to-day basis. With decades worth of experience unearthing liability details pertinent to each claim, our proven success sets us apart from other law firms.

Additionally possessing vast familiarity with Deer Creek’s local jurisdiction alongside its unique complexities solidifies Carlson Bier as a well-suited advocate irrespective of where one resides within Illinois state lines. Hence if aggressive representation mixed with empathy resonates with you after encountering canine-inflicted harm; look no further than Carlson Bier—the authoritative voice pushing relentlessly towards favourable restitution while aiding recovery processes exclusive to Dog Bite Injuries anywhere across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Deer Creek Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical trauma that a dog bite injury can bring. We are acclaimed personal injury attorneys situated in Illinois, dedicated to providing comprehensive legal counsel for victims of canine attacks.

Dog bite injuries often lead to serious complications that reach beyond initial wounds. Involved parties could potentially face extensive medical expenses, psychological distress, loss of income due to rehabilitation time-off from work – not mentioning the blatant violation of personal safety one experiences in such instances. Our team brings vast knowledge and tactical insight into navigating these complexities so that our clients achieve fair compensation for their distress.

A dog attack is not merely a simple incident; it includes various aspects that need thorough exploration for optimal litigation. The following points will provide you with an expert overview:

– Applicable Dog Bite Laws: Understanding state laws surrounding dog bite cases is crucial in laying down a solid claim. Illinois follows a strict “One-Bite rule,” which makes owners liable regardless if the animal previously displayed aggressive behavior.

– Statute of Limitations: In Illinois, there’s a two-year window from the date of the incident to file claims against responsible parties. Postponing action may result in missing this deadline.

– Identification of Liability: Identifying who bears responsibility depends on different factors such as ownership, keeper or harborer status at the time of attack.

– Assessing Damages: Not all losses incurred from dog bites are visible; long-term physical ailments, psychological impact should also form part of adequate compensation sought.

The extent and manner through which specific contributory negligence factors affect your claim can be complex and demanding to handle alone without adequate legal representation.

As experienced Illinois-based personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier Associates, we bring insightful interpretation and application of relevant legislation vital to your case presentation. Our proven track record speaks volumes about our unwavering commitment to those we represent. By liaising with us directly upon encountering such horrifying incidents involving pets owned by negligent parties, your journey towards obtaining rightful reimbursement becomes significantly less strenuous.

Educating victims and potential claimants about their rights, the legal process surrounding personal injury claims due to dog bites, is a task we take very seriously. Our commitment goes beyond mere representation in courtrooms; it extends to equipping you with necessary knowledge regarding laws applicable in Illinois that would work favorably to substantiate your specific case.

We are here for one goal: securing fair compensation commensurate to the emotional distress and physical harm incurred from such unfortunate events. Dog owners or caretakers should shoulder the full extent of the damages you’ve encountered on account of their negligence. We acknowledge the law can be overwhelming, even intimidating – this is where our duty lies: turning your valid experiences into solid claims articulated through apt adjudication instruments.

Life after a traumatic event like a dog bite incident can be extremely challenging but not when you have competent personal injury attorneys right beside you. If you’re grappling with how much your ordeal has actually cost you – consider taking advantage of our unique service feature by clicking on the button below. It gives an approximate measure tailored around specifics regarding one’s specific situation determining how much their claim potentially holds financially speaking.

No more guessing games – ascertain what value your case genuinely holds within Illinois’ legal spectrum backed by Carlson Bier’s unparalleled expertiserience in handling personal injury cases precisely hinged upon animal attack incidents today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Deer Creek Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Deer Creek

Areas of Practice in Deer Creek

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying expert legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Providing specialist legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Birth Harms

Providing legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Incident

Offering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Injuries

Focused on providing compassionate legal assistance for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in supporting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440