Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Deer Creek

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a Slip and Fall accident, safeguard your rights with Carlson Bier’s unrivaled legal expertise. As premier personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we prioritize our clients’ peace of mind. Our seasoned team adopts a strategic approach to secure just compensation for injuries sustained from preventable slip and fall incidents. We tirelessly work towards holding negligent parties accountable, aiming to alleviate financial burdens borne by victims during recovery. At Carlson Bier, we understand that no two cases are alike; hence our representation is tailored uniquely to each scenario while guaranteeing professional handling built on years of experience and competence. Unlike larger firms where individual attention may diminish slightly over time, at Carlson Bier you are always our top priority.With significant success records spanning across all aspects of personal injury law centered around Slip and Fall accidents, embracing the tenacity of Carlson Bier sets the wheels in motion for achievability on your journey toward justice

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Deer Creek Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a Slip and Fall accident can be distressing. While you are addressing your physical injuries, it’s also essential to understand the legal implications of such incidents. As Carlson Bier, leading personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our core objective is to help you through this challenging experience by offering expert legal counsel on Slip and Fall accidents.

In the state of Illinois, premises liability law holds property owners responsible for maintaining safe conditions – making them liable for any injuries that occur due to their negligence. A “Slip and Fall” accident refers specifically to situations where an individual slips or trips – due to hazardous settings within a property – subsequently suffering from bodily harm. Perhaps there was insufficient lighting, crucial repairs were ignored or even improper cleaning protocol that left floors dangerously slick; these are all scenarios potentially holding legal weight under “Slip and Fall”.

Critical stages post-accidents include ensuring timely reporting of the incident, gathering essential evidence (like photos of the hazard), obtaining witness testimonies if available, seeking immediate medical attention regardless of seemingly minor symptoms – as some injuries may not show immediately – and finally engaging skilled legal representation promptly.

• Timely Reporting: Don’t delay in communicating about your accident with the relevant authorities.

• Important Evidence: Essential proof could decide your case’s favorability.

• Witness Testimonies: These strengthen your claim significantly.

• Immediate Medical Attention: Seek necessary care without hesitation.

• Legal Representation: Hire experienced attorneys like ourselves at Carlson Bier.

Now allow us at Carlson Bier dive deeper into one overlooked aspect – Statute of Limitations in a Slip and Fall case. In Illinois, according to 735 ILCS 5/, any action for damages must commence within two years from when the accident occurred or when it was reasonably discovered thereafter; hence time plays an immutable role here.

Moreover, Illinois follows comparative negligence law whereby any fault on part of the complainant might restrict the amount of compensation awarded. If it is found that you were 25% or more at fault, your compensation may be reduced according to that same percentage.

We understand such complex legalities can feel overwhelming which underscores the importance of expertly guided help. Our dedicated team will evaluate all aspects of your case based on extensive professional experience in personal injury cases including Slip and Fall accidents. From examination of potential evidence, assessment of medical records, engagement with relevant witnesses to thorough understanding of Illinois law – our focus remains exclusively on securing optimal outcomes for you.

Finally, before this valuable piece ends, imagine if there was a way to gauge how much your case could potentially garner with just one simple click? Well, we have made that possible. As painless as piecing together a jigsaw puzzle; you are merely one tap away from discovering what Carlson Bier equipped with its weighty experience and profound knowledge might assist you towards procuring monetarily. Why remain marooned in worry when answers await below?

Ready to explore further? Please don’t hesitate – Click directly on the button below now! Discover an informed estimate derived explicitly from highly tailored algorithms translating years spent combating wavering circumstances into clear concise conclusions beneficial for clients like you profoundly. Empower yourself today by entrusting Illinois’s leading Personal Injury Attorney Group – Carlson Bier and together let’s turn a distressing situation into a journey towards fair justice!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Deer Creek Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Deer Creek

Areas of Practice in Deer Creek

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending expert legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Tumble Incidents

Adept in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable recompense for injuries and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Mishap

Providing adept legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Building Mishaps

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Focused on delivering professional legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer