Car Accident Attorney in East Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve experienced a car accident in East Garfield Park, securing the expertise and guidance of Carlson Bier is paramount. Highly renowned within Illinois, this distinguished law firm is perfectly equipped to alleviate your stress after such unfortunate incidents through steadfast legal representation. Their seasoned Car Accident attorneys are prepared to attentively listen to your unique circumstances and committed to relentlessly pursue justice on your behalf. Besides boasting an outstanding track record in obtaining suitable compensation for their clients from negligent parties or insurance companies, they bring you peace by providing seamless navigation through intricate procedures inherent with all auto accident claims. Why suffer more in a dire moment that has already affected you significantly? With top-rank reputation amidst personal injury lawyer firms and unparalleled dedication toward each case handled; embodied within the core values of Carlson Bier lies the ultimate commitment towards defending victims’ rights hence ensuring optimal outcomes while maintaining high ethical standards. Trust every step of your post-accident journey with Carlson Bier – because genuine compassion dovetailed with uncompromising professional competence makes all the difference!

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in East Garfield Park Illinois

Carlson Bier is a distinguished law firm based in Illinois, specializing in personal injury claims originating from vehicular accidents. With an invaluable combination of legal prowess and compassionate representation, we pride ourselves on championing the rights of individuals who’ve been adversely impacted in car accidents due to the negligence or misconduct of others.

Car accidents can be harrowing experiences, generating immense physical discomfort and emotional distress. However, the aftermath could potentially add further strain with mounting financial burdens emanating from medical expenses, lost earnings, property damage and more. Hence it becomes imperative that victims become cognizant of their rights and utilize legal recourse when appropriate.

Here at Carlson Bier, we endeavor to offer comprehensive educational resources about car accident cases – guiding each client through this often complex terrain with ease. We’re dedicated to shedding light on some elemental facets including:

– The prevalence of negligence as a key factor: From distracted driving due to cell phone usage, drunken driving to violation of traffic rules – proving this recklessness lies at the core.

– Importance of evidence: Documenting details immediately post-accident such as pictures/scenes/damage/ injuries or testimonies lend credence during claim settlement.

– Comprehending comparative fault: Under Illinois law when multiple parties contribute towards an accident–each party’s level of liability is assessed accordingly.

– Statute limitation awareness under Illinois jurisdiction: A two-year limit within which injury claims need to be filed post incident date.

Despite feeling overwhelmed by the intricate mandates encompassed within Car Accident Law – rest assured you’re not alone . Our experienced team will work diligently; decoding legislative terminologies and navigating systemic intricacies resultant from your unique circumstance whilst striving to seek maximum compensation for you.

In addition to being well versed in laws governing motor vehicle collisions across all types specifically motorcycle/truck/bus/public transport mishaps—we understand that each case is unlike any other owing its distinct variable mix such as involved parties/claim type/severity of injury and more. We affix a high degree of customizability to our representation style, ensuring it aligns with case specifics – offering comprehensive legal solutions that resonate with your unique narrative.

Regardless of whether you’re at the preliminary stage looking for initial advice or deep amidst ongoing litigation—our services extend across the spectrum: From collating practical evidence, crafting strong cases, negotiating settlements to court representations if needed – all while consolidating constant communication and transparency throughout each step.

Moreover, we respect that financial constraint might deter many from seeking rightful justice hence offer contingency fee systems where upon shoulders are shared—not necessarily implying fees entailment unless successful claim recovery.

We adopt a client centricity approach; acknowledging anxiety/skepticism/uncertainty concurrent to automobile accidents – thereon delicately threading the balance between aggressively advocating your cause yet handling sensitive grievances with empathy.

Leveraging years worth knowledge gained through experience/high success rate testimonials/wide network connections—we reaffirm our commitment towards settling car accident claims in favored resolution wherever feasible. Trust Carlson Bier’s prowess as we heed attention to details often overlooked by others whilst respecting confidentiality code ethics strictly thus promising not just competent but reliable representation too.

Feeling intrigued about how much your potential case might be worth? Take advantage of our free online consultation today by clicking on the button below! Our skilled attorney team would love nothing more than channelizing their expertise in carving out beneficial legal strategies tailored towards equipping you with deserved justice/recouping rightful compensation. Time awaits no one – act now before limitations expire!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Garfield Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

     

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in East Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in East Garfield Park

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying expert legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Offering experienced legal assistance for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Slip Mishaps

Expert in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Collision

Ensuring expert legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in delivering professional legal advice for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Committed to advocating for persons with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer