...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in East Peoria

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be traumatic and may bring about unanticipated legal complexities requiring expert assistance. In East Peoria, Carlson Bier is your perfect partner in navigating these complexities. With extensive experience handling such cases, we have refined the art of expeditiously securing necessary medical help for our clients while keenly building compelling cases to ensure maximum possible compensation. Our attorneys are well-versed in Illinois law pertaining to dog bites injuries, able to determine the viability of your case swiftly and provide timely advice on next steps. We leave no stone unturned; diligently investigating each incident from every angle with compassion balanced by tenacious advocacy for justice. Trust us at Carlson Bier where we understand that behind every dog bite injury there’s an aggrieved individual desiring fairness and relief from protagonists of their suffering – and it’s our mission to deliver just that! Share your story with Carlson Bier today as you seek rightful redress for Dog Bite Injuries suffered.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in East Peoria Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing comprehensive legal services for victims of dog bite injuries. As a highly reputed Illinois-based personal injury attorney group, our focus is on procuring maximum compensation for the damages suffered by the aggrieved party.

Dog bites can have traumatic physical and psychological implications that extend way beyond the physical scarring. These incidents often involve long-term emotional trauma and steep medical expenses related to rabies shots, antibiotics, stitches, reconstructive surgery among other potential health ramifications. Having dealt with countless clients grappling with such grim realities, we possess a deep-seated understanding of mercy laws specific to Illinois State and employ this knowledge relentlessly towards securing your rightful claim.

Enacted under ‘The Animal Control Act,’ the state of Illinois operates under ‘Strict Liability’ when it comes to dog bite cases meaning that dog owners are held responsible for an injury even if the animal had no previous history of aggression or viciousness. However, key points one should be aware of about this law include:

• A legitimization of the claim requires proof that you did not provoke the dog leading up to the incident.

• The event must occur while you’re legally allowed within private property or overtly present over public terrain.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier works painstakingly to gather evidence supporting these prerequisites ensuring your presented case holds irrevocable merit.

We acknowledge how critical it is for victims dealing with recent trauma to be treated humanely which is reflected in our empathetic interactions and streamlined processes designed to minimize stress on them while maximizing their chance of receiving deserved reparations.

So how does our solution-oriented approach work? Initially, our seasoned attorneys offer a free consultation during which they assess every detail pertaining sorted into categories such as past/present/future medical bills; pain/suffering inflicted upon victim; wages lost due to ensuing disability based off complete payroll data along with several factors nevertheless contributing indirectly towards assessing total claim value like loss endured concerning overall life quality.

Following this, we establish a clear line of communication with the involved insurance company initiating a thorough negotiation process centered on demanding fair compensation for your distress witnessed hence commencing preparation on filing lawsuit incase the said dialogue becomes unproductive. This meticulous modality ensures every possible avenue leading to justice is fully explored providing you best legal representation available.

Subsequent to filing the claim, we keep our clients abreast throughout progression course constantly updating them about new developments so they are never left without clue under what might seem intricate legal paradigm to layman perspective. It’s only upon successful procurement of compensation that our fee gets deducted ensuring absolute transparency and no out-of-pocket expenses for you during such testing times.

With dependability proudly being one of our key strengths, take rest assured Carlson Bier remains committed towards your cause until victory tastes sweetest fruit! While it goes beyond stating obvious that accurate computation stands pivotal in deriving rightful claim amount yet many victims fail realizing legitimate value simply due lack knowledge or poorly guided advice consequently accepting lesser amounts than deserved; which where we come into play turning odds favorably inside court room manifesting absolute justice given every situation individually assessed beforehand.

Now that you are armed with this comprehensive insight into dog bite injury claims, make an informed choice regarding your legal representation. Harness the power of our expertise and allow us guide you through each stage reiterating promise deliver nothing but unwavering dedication towards securing higher compensations possible lifting veil off dark shadow caused by traumatic incident embracing brighter future instead!

Click below to get a free evaluation from Carlson Bier today – let skilled team attorneys assess worth case making pursuit justice easier fulfilling endeavor becoming beacon hope amidst unprecedented gloom thus culminating relentless quest closure hereby epitomizing essence true advocacy at its very core! Make move toward reclaiming meaningful existence compelling society recognize individual rights reinforced structured law frameworks assuring anyone affected unfortunate events entitled financial help reciprocally contributing their recovery journey greatly.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Peoria Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in East Peoria

Areas of Practice in East Peoria

Bicycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending professional legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering professional legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Trip Injuries

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure fair recompense for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Providing specialist legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Specializing in providing compassionate legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in defending victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer