...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Edgewood

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re involved in a bicycle accident in Edgewood, the highly-skilled team at Carlson Bier is your ideal choice for professional legal representation. Our Illinois-established firm specializes in personal injury cases, particularly focusing on bicycle accidents. Navigating the aftermath of such misfortunes can be daunting; hence our committed attorneys dedicate themselves to understanding every detail about your case and apply their extensive experience to ensure that justice is served. With Carlson Bier, you get specialized knowledge, personalized attention and a profound commitment towards securing the best outcome possible for each client we represent. We pride ourselves on our accessible and compassionate approach while staunchly advocating for victims’ rights. As avid cyclists ourselves, we understand first-hand the risks associated with cycling incidents on public roadways which aids us in delivering unparalleled expertise in this specific field of law. Act now – reach out to Carlson Bier today; let’s fight together for your right to safety and fair recompense after any tragic bike mishaps! Because where there’s blame – there should be a claim.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Edgewood Illinois

At the Carlson Bier law firm, we specialize in helping victims of bicycle accidents recover compensation for their injuries, physical pains, emotional distress, as well as lost income opportunities. Located in Illinois, our expert team is dedicated to providing you with comprehensive legal support that tailors each case on an individual basis.

Bicycle accidents can lead to serious consequences both physically and emotionally. Often due to negligent drivers or poor road conditions, cyclists are put in high-risk situations resulting in major injuries such as brain trauma, spinal cord damage, broken bones which could require extensive medical treatment accompanied by hefty bills and potentially long-lasting effects on personal and professional life.

Several decisive factors need consideration when determining liability in a bicycle accident. Misinterpretation of traffic laws by motorists often results in collision mishaps. Ill-maintained roads featuring dangerous potholes or other obstacles constitute another root cause endangering cyclist safety. Furthermore, manufacturing defects from bike vendors might contribute towards an increased risk of potential organized lawsuits.

Resonating with Illinois state laws for cycling incidents involves understanding specific local provisions related to right of way rules surrounding biking lanes and behaviour expectations at intersections such points will play crucial roles during claim proceedings:

• Recognize that cyclists under Illinois laws share equal rights with motorized vehicles

• Proper usage of designated bike lanes unless making turns at intersections.

• Roadway shoulder use being obligatory only if the paved portion is free for vehicular traffic.

• Implicit expectation for all cyclists to sustain a reasonable speed corresponding existing traffic conditions.

While you focus on your recovery post-incident, ensuring proper adherence to these stipulations serves pivotal during claim evaluations enabling us achieve sizeable settlements especially from uncooperative insurance companies outright denying their responsibility.

As experienced Personal Injury Attorneys operating within Illinois jurisdiction – our ultimate goal transcends wealth reclamation; extending towards establishing long-term solutions complementing progressive recovery benefiting your overall wellbeing and returning normalcy into your lives following strenuous circumstances. Hence, our legal prowess and compassionate approach have been lauded throughout the community – symbolizing client-centric ethos we continue to uphold.

Carlson Bier boasts an exemplary track record in successfully negotiating substantial settlements; however, unafraid to assertively engage inside the courtroom whenever necessity calls proving our unwavering commitment towards all clients. Moreover, entrusting us earns you an ally consulting on every little detail ensuring comfortability while your case pursues settlement or litigation.

For those afflicted due to a bicycle accident, bear in mind a paired combination of initial medical expenses plus potential future requirements resulting from persisting injuries often outweighs insurance claim limits. Consequently, enlisting Carlson Bier amplifies chances attaining rightful compensation necessary for uninterrupted healing journey.

We uphold nothing but utter transparency with clear fee layouts avoiding hidden intricacies. Spend not a dime unless successful financial reclaim benefits your way!

Understanding your legal rights following a bicycle accident is crucial. At Carlson Bier, we are passionate about championing your cause and championing justice above all else – depicting quintessential qualities you look for empowering representation in Illinois.

If you’ve been impacted by such an unfortunate event and seek professional guidance determining ideal next steps or whether viable grounds exist for pursuing a personal injury claim- waste not another moment! Simply click on the button below and discover how much worth stands behind your case givens today’s circumstances: fair remuneration lay only one click away bringing forth rejuvenating capacity into your life once more. With Carlson Bier – Justice Served Right!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Edgewood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Edgewood

Areas of Practice in Edgewood

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending expert legal assistance for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Extending experienced legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Trip Occurrences

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for damages and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Providing adept legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Focused on extending professional legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to assisting clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​