...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Edgewood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bite injuries can be traumatic and stressful, leading to significant pain, medical bills, loss of wages, or even disfigurement. When these unfortunate incidences occur in Edgewood or its environs, Carlson Bier’s seasoned team steps up to the task with unparalleled dedication. Our attorneys are specialized in handling dog bite injury cases ensuring you benefit from their deep knowledge and extensive experience. We provide a robust legal representation tailored remarkably for this specific area of personal injury law. The crucial factor that distinguishes us is our approach: we listen emphatically, understand your unique circumstances before crafting a solid case so as not to leave any stone unturned when pursuing justice for our clients injured by dog bites. At Carlson Bier appreciate the enormity of pain caused by such incidents; hence we endeavor tenaciously on your behalf for maximum compensation allowed under Illinois law bringing peace of mind amidst distressing times – because at Carlson Bier your restoration matters! Choose us as you consider seeking recourse after a dog-bite incident – let us help steer towards restitution & recovery together!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Edgewood Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be a traumatic and stressful experience. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, is dedicated to representing clients who have been subjected to such devastating incidents. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), approximately 4.5 million dog bites occur each year in the United States. Not only can these injuries cause physical damage but emotional suffering as well – a serious ordeal that should not be dealt with alone. At Carlson Bier, we’re here to help victims navigate through this daunting process while aggressively pursuing justice on your behalf.

Understanding dog bite cases involves delving into several important aspects:

• The magnitude of devastation caused by dog bites

• Your rights under Illinois law

• Establishing liability

• Potential compensation

The severity of dog bite injuries can extend from simple abrasions or contusions to more severe consequences like broken bones, nerve damage, facial scars, or even death in extreme cases. Emotional turmoil may also ensue wherein victims could suffer anxiety attacks and fear around animals post the incident. In recent years, it’s recorded that U.S consumers spent $675 million for reconstructive procedures related to dog bites—an alarming rise underscoring their detrimental impact.

Moving onto legal considerations pertaining to the state where Carlson Bier operates: Illinois follows strict liability rules against dog owners when a bite or attack occurs – irrespective whether the animal has never shown violent tendencies previously or doesn’t have a prior biting incident documented. As long as you weren’t trespassing or provoking the canine during the mishap, under Section 16 of Illinois’ Animal Control Act (“Act”), you’re entitled to seek damages from the owner.

In order to establish liability in such situations – key elements required include pinpointing both parties’ whereabouts at time of incident; detailing significant damages incurred because of the respective animal; validating ensuing facts without wavering evidential support proving defendant’s wrongful conduct resulting thereby – all of these may present intricate legal challenges. The proficient attorneys at Carlson Bier provide the necessary expertise to navigate through this complex maze.

Given these circumstances, potential compensation includes medical expenses for treating physical injuries; therapy costs addressing any psychological trauma; loss of income due to time away from work or suffering a reduced earning capacity stemming from temporary or permanent disablement related to the injury; non-economic damages referring to pain and suffering endured as result of the occurrence besides others deemed applicable under Illinois law – all being repayment rights victims are entitled to with skilled professional legal support.

Balancing crucial aspects involved in dog bite injury claims – whether gathering critical evidence contributing towards robust defence plan, handling hefty paperwork requirements efficiently while ensuring correct document submission within stipulated deadlines, coordinating with insurance companies plus potentially representing you during trials if settlement negotiations don’t prosper – our dedicated team are primed to leverage years’ collective experience in assisting clients achieve optimum restitution suited their individual case intricacies.

The importance of choosing right representation is paramount considering multiple variables influencing outcome dog bite lawsuits. Providing seasoned guidance personalised client’s specific circumstances, Carlson Bier meticulous attention-to-detail paired formidable negotiating skills culminate formulating calculated strategic approach seeking maximum entitlements for injured party because everyone deserves fair judgement ensuing such harrowing incidents.

In recognizing complexity surrounding dog bite injury claims further comprehending critical benefits engaging practiced representation like Carlson Bier conveys upon victims accommodatingly, we’d welcome providing comprehensive evaluation concerning your unique case particulars subsequently determining suitable course tailored around achieving justice fullest potential extent prescribed under law– request today by clicking button below allow us find out much claim worth embarking victorious legal journey together compelling vindication beliefs that no one should bear unjust consequences inadvertently caused someone else’s negligence. Trust Carlson Bier – assertive allies proficiently championing personal injury victim rights steadfast pursuit towards desired remuneration findings.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Edgewood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Edgewood

Areas of Practice in Edgewood

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing adept legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering expert legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Trip Occurrences

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal support for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents secure equitable payout for hurts and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending expert legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for harms.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Dedicated to extending professional legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Expert in supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer